ipl-logo

Compare Clinton's Impeachment And The Iran Hostage Scandal

390 Words2 Pages

Sometimes, you will have to lie by omission or outright in the interest of national security. Carter did so during the Iran Hostage Crisis, particularly with regard to the Argo Operation. However, tell the truth at all other times. It will prevent a lot of issues. Watergate, Clinton’s Impeachment, and the Iran-Contra Scandals all could have been avoided if people had just told the truth.

This is an all-around good rule to follow. No one is above the law, especially the president. Watergate, Clinton’s Impeachment, and the Iran-Contra Scandals were all caused by the illegal actions of the president and members of his staff. Therefore, you should hold everyone accountable to the law, especially yourself, because if you do not, the American

Show More
Related

  • Nixon Watergate Scandal Research Paper

    971 Words  | 4 Pages

    Governmental Crime: The Nixon-Watergate Scandal and the Trump-Russia Scandal Us Americans believe that our government is truly amazing, and some of us even consider said government to be the best that exists in the world when honestly, we're living in a lie. The white house is a place of scandalous happenings, despite the front, they try to keep up. Such examples are the historical Nixon-Watergate scandal, and the current Trump-Russia scandal, where both the president and the government cooperated to do a crime. The Nixon-Watergate Scandal and the Trump-Russia Scandal are related by the President’s cover-up attempts, the involvement of FBI/Other important government organizations, and the overall corruptness of the events.

    Read More

  • The Break-In: The Impeachment Of President Nixon

    165 Words  | 1 Pages

    On July 17, 1972, the Watergate hotel, the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee, was broken into by five men. After being caught, it was found that these men carried top of the line surveillance equipment. It was also found that these men had ties to the committee to re-elect Nixon as President of the United States, and this discovery eventually led to the ironic impeachment of President Nixon. Although the Federal Bureau of Investigation investigated the break-in, it was Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward, two common reporters from the Washington Post, who cracked this case wide open. This team, nicknamed Woodstein, went above and beyond, not only covering the break in, but traced why it occurred all the way up to the white house.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Lewinsky And Bill Clinton Impeachment

    746 Words  | 3 Pages

    Enrichment Paper 2 When I think of major scandals of my time, none are more relevant than Bill Clinton an intern Monica Lewinsky. But if you ask someone older, they are going to say Richard Nixon and the Water gate scandal, both were very damaging to the United States, because of the lying and tampering of evidence which affected innocent people it. Clinton and Nixon were the only presidents in our history to be impeached with the greatest significant scandals there ever was. Nixon immediately resigned, while Clinton stayed in office after impeachment.

    Read More

  • How Did Richard Nixon Gain Power In Government

    399 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the post-9/11 period, the government passed policies against foreigners, especially those who had connections with Arab, to secure the nation from terrorism. The abuse of power is more likely to be accepted when it comes with a “reasonable explanation.” On the other hand, when Nixon used the government power to cover the truth of Watergate, his action was no different than corruption, therefore not being recognized by the public. Moreover, the impact of the Watergate Scandal was deep and enduring- it stated the necessity of openness and honesty in

    Read More

  • Impeachment In The Constitutional Order By Jeffrey Tlais

    952 Words  | 4 Pages

    In American Politics, impeachment is a legislature power to charge a public official for misconduct and remove such person from office if found guilty. The Constitution gives the House of Representatives the sole power of impeaching, and makes Senate the sole court to try all impeachments. So far, no American Presidents have been removed from office as a result of impeachment. The impeachment process, according to Alexander Hamilton in the Federalists Papers, is regarded as an important tool in separation of powers to keep the executive branch in check. However, the process has been widely understood as a legal procedure, similar to a criminal prosecution.

    Read More

  • Us Vs Nixon Essay

    485 Words  | 2 Pages

    United States v. Nixon and Clinton v. Jones should have had the same outcome from the Supreme Court. Both, former President 's violated the law and wanted to use presidential privileges to dismiss their cases. In the United States v. Nixon, the Court had the right to order the President to relinquish the tapes to Congress to use as evidence for the trial against the seven members held accountable. Those accused were owed a duty by the Court to be given a fair and speedy trial. In the Clinton v. Jones case, the Court should have not granted the former President Clinton immunity because the general public needs to realize that not even the President can violate the law and get away with it.

    Read More

  • Richard Nixon Watergate Scandal

    789 Words  | 4 Pages

    Throughout the history of the United States of America, there have been various political affairs. One of the most famous, however, would have to be what is known as the “Watergate” scandal. This scandal began on June 17, 1972, when five individuals were arrested for attempted burglary at the Democratic National Committee headquarters. The five men involved were: Virgilio Gonzalez, Bernard Barker, James W. McCord Jr., Eugenio Martinez, and Frank Sturgis. All of these individuals were members of U.S. President Richard Nixon’s Committee to Re-elect the President (CRP).

    Read More

  • Watergate Throat Analysis

    2406 Words  | 10 Pages

    Although some would say it was more of an eye opener, both the House and the Senate found the holes in the so called “balance of powers” ,that were once so weak, and patched them. From the article and gathered information I speculate that if anything watergate shows how weak the balance was, but that doesn’t mean it will solve the root problem. If someone wants something bad enough they will go on the verge of anything to fulfil it, as noticed, even if that means breaking a few

    Read More

  • Brad Blanton: Honestly, Just Tell The Truth

    422 Words  | 2 Pages

    For example, in the article, “Brad Blanton: Honestly, just tell the truth”, by Barbara Ballinger, Blanton states that “we shouldn’t manipulate the truth except for the rare times…”. I believe that the only lies that should be told are lies to protect individuals who are in need. You shouldn’t manipulate the truth, either you tell the truth or lie when yourself or others are in danger. Additionally, in Ballinger's article, Blanton also states “ if you’re hiding Anne Frank in your attic because her life is in danger, then you should lie.

    Read More

  • Essay On Ronald Reagan Impeachments

    514 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ronald Reagan could have definitely been impeached by the standards used on the governors governors (malfeasance, misfeasance or nonfeasance) mainly because of the many things that he had done during his presidency. There were were reports from Beirut that the Reagan administration approached Iran with an arms for hostage deal but President Ronald Reagan denied it. Days later he did admit that arms had been shipped to Iran to forge a better relationship but denied they were arms for hostages. He negotiated with terrosists!If that does not scream impeachment then I do not know what does.

    Read More

  • The President's Failure To Impeach In The United States

    152 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the U.S Constitution, it states that if President is convicted of any treason, corruption, or any other high Crimes and transgressions they can be removed from office. However, there are many steps to being impeach. The first thing in order for the President to be impeach is when the situation of the President brings attention to the members of the House of Representatives. Next, they are handed over to the House Judiciary Committee to see if the situation is serious. If the situation is serious then the president would be presented to the U.S Senate to decide if he should be impeached.

    Read More

  • Barbara Jordan We The People Speech Analysis

    738 Words  | 3 Pages

    The water gates scandal is why President Nixon was being impeached but he resigned before the house voted on the Articles hence Nixon was not impeached during the

    Read More

  • Bill Clinton Impeachment Case

    1438 Words  | 6 Pages

    The second President that got impeached followed after the impeachment of President Andrew Johnson is President Bill Clinton, on December 19, 1998. Due to the bitter partisanship that dominated Washington, D.C. during his two terms, and to his personal flaws, he became the most investigated President in history. (The impeachment of Bill Clinton). And there were many events that happened in the course of the time to get to the impeachment. There are many events that had lead to the start of the whole impeachment trial of President Bill Clinton.

    Read More

  • Essay On 25th Amendment

    606 Words  | 3 Pages

    Finally, I would like to briefly touch upon the topic of impeachment. Impeachment is the removal or discrediting of a President before the end of term, this process is not easy for Congress and it is typically seen as the political equivalent of an indictment in Criminal Law. The House of Representatives may, by majority vote to impeach a president for “treason, bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors” and if that is what is decided it moves to the Senate to be tried by the Chief Justice of the Supreme

    Read More

  • The President's Impeachment In Office

    962 Words  | 4 Pages

    Consistency in rulings is important because it ensures fairness. In other words, consistency means holding every individual accountable and subjecting them to the same legal standards. The ambiguity of the impeachment terms and the political nature of the process create possibilities of two presidents being differently subjected to impeachment. Of course, no two reasons for impeachment can be similar but consequences should be commensurate with offenses. For instance, Bill Clinton was impeached for obstruction of justice, and dishonesty, in a way that should not reflect presidential character, non-withstanding the fact that many other presidents epitomized the same substandard behavior, and even worse at times.

    Read More

More about Compare Clinton's Impeachment And The Iran Hostage Scandal

Open Document