Compare Hitler And Machiavelli

838 Words4 Pages
The famous manual “The Prince” by Machiavelli is still to this day the main resource that explains and gives advice on how to be a good politician. In 26 chapters it holds powerful rules that Machiavelli believed were key points that one must follow to become a successful politician. Machiavelli was a politician, historian, philosopher, humanist, and writer and lived in Florence during the Renaissance and changed the world with his political philosophies. Like Machiavelli, Adolf Hitler was also a powerful politician and the chancellor of Germany from 1933 to 1945. He was also the dictator of Nazi Germany from 1939 to 1945. Machiavelli and Hitler can be compared through their honesty, social beliefs, and justice system.
The first statement that we can compare Machiavelli and Hitler with is “Man is easily fooled, be a good liar”. Although Machiavelli doesn’t write specifically that lying is good, he explicated that it is good to be a good liar when needed through his words.
…show more content…
This applies to Hitler because he was both feared and loved by many. Germany was not in good shape after WWI and when Hitler came and assured the people recovery, they could not refuse. In the end Hitler brought down the unemployment in Germany from 7 million to only 1 million in 12 months. Hitler knew how he could maintain his leadership, because one thing he knew was that he was feared by his enemies/opponents. Because of the great power that Hitler had, plenty of his political opponents would be commanded to be scared away or executed. An example of his aggression towards his opponents/enemies is the “Night of the Long Knifes”, where 77 political leaders were executed on his orders. Soon the SA (a Nazi paramilitary group) got complete power and allowed to arrest anyone that did something bad and were seen, it made them
Open Document