It is said that a Christian can be stumped with three questions. The questioner starts with, “What are your beliefs on *insert topic here*?” The Christian responds with an answer based on Biblical truth. Then they are asked, “Why do you believe this?” and the Christian answers, “That’s what the Bible says.” Finally the questioner asks, “How do you the Bible is true?” at this point most Christians are stumped. A way to satisfy the questioner’s inquiry would be to give reasons supported by geography, prophecy, and archaeology to just name a few. First of all, the Bible is true based on the accuracy at the time it was written and the process by which it was copied down. The New Testament was written between A.D.50-90. The difference between …show more content…
Also, there are over six thousand portions or full copies of the New Testament. Compared to Homer’s the Iliad, one of the most trusted documents in human history, which was written in 900 B.C. its earliest copy is A.D. 400, that’s a five hundred year difference. Plus, there are only six hundred forty three known copies of the Iliad. The Bible was inerrant at the time it was written down because the authors were eyewitnesses. They also had hundreds to even thousands of other eyewitnesses to back up their writings. If the Bible was false, then the hundreds of eyewitnesses would have disproved the Bible soon after it was written. The Bible was copied with almost near perfection, minus a few errors that were inevitable, since they were human. The Hebrew copying process leaves little room for error with rules such as; if a single letter was added or deleted, …show more content…
In Daniel, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego were cast into a furnace for refusing to worship the gold statue of Nebuchadnezzar. This furnace must have been big enough to hold three men, most furnaces aren’t that big. It has been found through archaeology that Nebuchadnezzar liked glazed bricks to decorate his palace. These bricks are made by firing them in a furnace twice. Furthermore, there is now a motive for Nebuchadnezzar to have furnace that big, in order to make enough bricks to decorate his extremely large palace efficiently, he must have had at least one large furnace. Also, in Joshua a battle is described between the Jewish people and Sennacherib. Archaeologists have found a prism relaying all of Sennacherib’s battles, this prism has an almost word for word version of the battle described in Joshua. Although the prism does not include the fact that the Israelis defeated Sennacherib, why would he include his losses on his gloating record? These instances, plus many more, add to the credibility of the
(110) Hypothetical question here—would it be foolish to think that the author of a textbook that purports to take a rigorous historical approach to introducing New Testament writings and early Christian writings would know better than to introduce an idea, a theory that has never been proven and pass it off as history? It appears the line that separates historical fact from fiction is easily
The first writer is John Van Seter who wrote the book “Abraham in History and Tradition”, disagreeing that no conclusive proof existed to support the historical being of Abraham and the other Biblical Patriarchs or the ancient consistency of their origins in Mesopotamia and their achievements and travels as depicted in the book of book of Genesis. Another writer found his work to have been falsified materials to support his work, thus leaving evidence to prove Pentateuch. The second writer: Frank Cross, believes the Pentateuch were rewriting of poetic epic. He support this belief by giving example of Russian and Spanish moving in same direction from epic to prose chronicles.
When it comes to knowing and learning the religions of the world one must approach them with a critical mind. One cannot simply just believe every religion and know have their own view points. David Van Biema presents his ideas about Christianity and Jesus in “The Gospel Truth?”. Van Biema’s main point is about how “Matthew, Mark, Luke and John… is notoriously unreliable,” . Van Biema writes about how one cannot be completely sure about whether to believe if Jesus actually said what is written in the bible, he continues to say that Jesus may even be an “imaginative theological construct” .
In John 14:25 Jesus tells his disciples of the Holy Spirit and that he is a part of God in them. God gives us the Holy Spirit to help tell us the truth of God and the world. Without the Holy Spirit we would not be able to have the truth of life on our sides. In this I believe that Genesis 1-11 is historically accurate because of the genealogy, places, how the New Testament points to the Old Testament and how God can reveal to us. Genealogy is something that is really important in a historical sense.
When talking about the bible it is not important to reach the conclusion on the conversation it is important to start the conversation. Interpretation of the bible needs to be an open mind. Some people are going to think differently of the bible than you; but you have to keep an open mind because there is no right or wrong answer. You also have to forget what everyone else is telling you about the bible to be able to have your view and interpret what you think of it with the opinion of other people. The bible does not only have one view and as Brueggemann states, “The Bible requires human interpretation which is inescapably subjective.”
There is no proof that the Bible is even accurate. Religion is merely a series of beliefs, it is not based on facts. Furthermore a religious book cannot determine a person’s fate. Also, not everyone in America have the same beliefs, there are a variety of religions, and therefore I don’t believe that one religion can
When we choose to believe the bible literally we need to acknowledge a few things. You must also then be accountable to the many other literal instructions. You should not be eating pork is an example of an old idea. Also, Corvino brings up the point of the Greek society. The Greeks had relationships between men and boys.
This book fit right into this era for the population. The book was written very well. It was put together as a teaching. Some passages were also put together as a testimony if you say. It was almost as if he wrote it to prevent certain things from occurring in the future.
There are clear statements that indicate the Bible is not only God breathed, but it is a whole and true document. The Rock not only mentions the Bible being God breathed, “Holy men of God, being moved by the Holy Spirit, wrote every word of Scripture, and it is divinely and uniquely inspired, being absolutely trustworthy in all matters of faith and conduct,” but it explicitly states that because all scripture is God breathed, “all Scripture in the original manuscripts are inerrant in that it conveys exactly what God wants us to know and is complete in it’s present form.” The Nicene Creed never once discusses the Bible nor it’s inerrancy. It is interesting to see that they left this out and also committed the idea that God spoke every word of the Bible and it was written by his holy
The main difference between these two
This is a fallacy because nobody can state that the bible is true and people must follow whatever it says in the bible. People believe in the bible because they have their faith in the Holy Father. On the other hand, the contrasts and conflicts between the Bible and science make people cannot accept the Bible as what it is. Brady says, “God spake to the men who wrote the Bible,”(98) this is not true because God did not speak to anyone.
The Bible is so detailed that every person has a different view for every
Some Christians believe the whole Bible is inspired by God, and some even believe that the Bible was written by God himself. Under that logic, there are a couple of holes in the Bible. This is especially true for the New Testament. The New Testament is a collection of 27 books by supposedly eight different authors.
As the Bible was slowly put together, God was watching over this process to make sure that even if people do tamper with the creation of the Bible that his people will still hear the truth. Lastly, I believe that everything that took place in the Bible is true. The reason God gave us the Bible is to help his believers learn about what has happened before and after he has sent his son, to bring his believers closer to him, spread the word, to learn from
According to statistics the Holy Bible has been read by more people than any other book in the world. Therefore, the fact that it was often misused is not surprising. The Holy Bible wasn’t written only for people who work in ministry, it was written for every believer, for every follower of Jesus Christ. This should encourage us to approach Scripture with given respect, trying to understand it trough God's intended meaning, rather than by enforcing our own will on it to make it fit our beliefs.