ipl-logo

Comparing Authority In Apology Of Socrates And Hebrew Bible

1800 Words8 Pages

In the Apology of Socrates and Hebrew Bible, there are different structures of authority – the way people live their lives, or how they view their world. The Greek gods and the Hebrew God gain power by influencing every aspect of these people’s lives. The structures of authority are evidently shown in the Apology of Socrates, when the judges are harsh on Socrates about a crime that Socrates did not do. Also, it is in the books of the Bible how the Jews judge each other. Another structure of authority that show in these works are the messengers who do what their Gods want them to do. Although the Athenians’ and Jews’ lives contrast sharply, the ways they devote themselves to their Gods are similar.
First of all, the Greek gods are nothing like the Hebrew …show more content…

Cupid marries the beautiful girl, Psyche, and takes care of her. When Cupid’s wound heals at the end of The Golden Ass, “he could no longer bear to be parted for so long from Psyche” (104). The Greek gods and the people who follow them are not very forgiving, especially toward Socrates, who only speaks the truth, not his religion. The Athenians, who are polytheists, are relentless when voting against Socrates because they do not agree with the views of Socrates and believe that Socrates has been “corrupting the young and not believing in the gods the city believes…” (Apology 24b; 24c). Socrates is not an atheist because he says that if he believes in divinities, then he believes there are gods (Apology 27d), he just believes in different Greek gods. Plus, Socrates is not forcing a new religion on young people, he takes the opportunity to talk to people willing to listen to him. It just happens to be young people that listen to Socrates rambling on about how wise people are not actually geniuses. He is not spreading the word about his gods. Unfortunately, the judges still think

Show More
Related

  • Euthyphro And The Crito Analysis

    529 Words  | 3 Pages

    Not completely satisfied by Euthyphro’s definition that, “Piety, then, is that which is dear to the gods”, Socrates pointed out that gods were known to disagree and argue; therefore, they may not have had unified opinion on what is holy. To further frustrate Euthyphro, Socrates continued his argument by asking the following question, “Holy is beloved by the gods because it’s

    Read More

  • Evaluating Socrates Claim In The Apology

    835 Words  | 4 Pages

    Euthyphro tries to explain him that he was doing the same as Zeus did to his father and therefore being pious. But Socrates argues that it is just an example and not an explanation. He tries again and says what gods like is pious and what they dislike is not. But Socrates points out the fallacy in that argument that one god might not agree with another to which he replies in his third attempt what all gods like is pious and what they all hate is impious. Here, in this example we can see that how he searches for a concrete and complete definition for being pious.

    Read More

  • Why Was Socrates Guilty

    1641 Words  | 7 Pages

    Not believing in Gods Socrates did not recognize the gods, which were generally accepted in Athens. As it is known, in the community of that time some traditions and regulations were formed, and if person did not compliance them, this person acts against society. The charge was formulated as follows: "Socrates breaks the law not recognizing the gods, which recognizes the city, but recognizing the believing in some new genius" (literally "new demon"). So if in Athens laws was also traditions, and tradition was to believe in generally accepted gods, not believing in gods Socrates was breaking the law.

    Read More

  • Christian God Vs Greek Gods Essay

    730 Words  | 3 Pages

    Have you ever noticed that the gods of Greece are quite different from the Christian God? In recent readings of Mythology it has been noticed that Greek gods are different from God. There are many differences that have been found, but one of them is the grace of the gods and God. The grace of these two figures should be considered because of how people get grace, examples of grace in the Bible, and examples of grace in mythology books.

    Read More

  • Comparing Socrates Apology And Jeremiah's Prophecies

    1022 Words  | 5 Pages

    Many controversial opinions arise during times of societal transformation. Although separated by space and time, Socrates's Apology and Jeremiah's prophecies are two messages that aim to initiate changes in society. Despite their common goal, Socrates's daimon argument is in direct conflict with Jeremiah's single God prophecy. The two also diverge in how they support their claims, in their focus on internal motivation versus external actions, and the outcome of their critiques. In this paper, I argue Socrates's statement is stronger than Jeremiah's in almost every aspect and provide the justification for this claim.

    Read More

  • The Gods And Mortals In Homer's The Odyssey

    610 Words  | 3 Pages

    The relationships between the Greek gods and mortals have always been complicated. The gods can be generous and supportive, but also harsh and destructive towards the humans. They claim to be all powerful beings with unlimited power and influence, but in truth, they are far more human than they are perceived. They meddle with human lives, not because they are wise, but because of their own selfish reasons. In Homer’s

    Read More

  • Tragic Hero In Plato's Apology

    1376 Words  | 6 Pages

    The term “apology comes from the Greek word apologia which means to defend. In this essay I would like to explain why I believe that The Apology by Plato should be classified as pity and fear, in regards to Greek tragedy. I believe that this is true because I can personally empathize with Socrates; this will be discussed later on in this essay. A tragic hero is considered to be an individual with an intellectual flaw or error, Socrates fits this description; Socrates failed to understand that he could not empathize with the jurors because they simply wanted him to acknowledge his prior offenses, while he only sought out telling the truth and not sullying his own moral code. Socrates should be considered a tragic hero because he had an intellectual error, not an ethical one.

    Read More

  • Comparing Socrates In The Apology, Crito, And The Republic

    802 Words  | 4 Pages

    Comparing Socrates words in the Republic for the philosopher to rule to the words of the Apology where philosophy is viewed as something that is punishable by death, this is where the defense or importance of philosophy is realized. For if the philosophers were the ones to rule, nobody would question whether or not what they were doing was right or wrong because the philosopher-kings make the rules through wisdom and knowledge. Plato wants to paint a portrait of the philosopher as not only something the city should want to have, but also as someone who would be fit to rule above all others. This contrasts, again, to the points made by the jurors to Socrates in the Apology for they saw Socrates as someone who brings the city

    Read More

  • Religious Corruption In Antigone

    1581 Words  | 7 Pages

    “Oh god, is there a man alive / who knows, who actually believes...” (Sophocles, Antigone 1162-63). Religious corruption has led to a complete dismissal of religion; the world has lost its tune with the divine, spirituality has become a myth and a doctrine for the elderly. Gazing back into the depths of time reveals vital yet lost opinions on Divinity which have vanished in modern cultures. Within the ancient Greek works, a careful analyzation unfolds the authors opinions on whether the gods and oracles are worthy of veneration or just tools in a political battle of power.

    Read More

  • A Rhetorical Analysis Of Socrates 'Apology'

    1314 Words  | 6 Pages

    He was proving this because throughout his speech, he made it seem like the idea of knowing the truth and having real knowledge about a subject wasn’t needed in order to achieve the goal of persuasion. In Socrates’ speech he stated, “...if I say that the unexamined life is not worth living, you’ll believe me even less... you think I’ve been convicted for lack of arguments that would have persuaded you…” Socrates never specified or went into details about his beliefs that he was presenting to the court which, revealed to them that he did not know anything. He wasn’t able to strengthen his claims by providing evidence meaning his use of logos was faulty. However, Socrates’ goal was not to gather evidence to make it seem as if he was putting all his efforts in saving his life.

    Read More

  • Athleticism And Corruption In Ancient Greek Culture

    709 Words  | 3 Pages

    This corruption in a sense commonly sparks arguments noting that “social life too was creatively manipulated”(Hornblower 18). It is difficult to firmly say whether the ancient Greeks were correct in their ideals, as this is a matter of perspective and completely different times. These evils can properly be seen throughout as the representation of meaning behind various Greek gods. It has been noted that through this personification is “when men begin to question the origin and in-being of right and wrong, and really reflect upon the religion of which they find themselves possessed”(Robins 2). It could be reasoned that rather than interrupt these actions as their own, it may simply be easier to avoid such troubles by pointing the blame on their gods.

    Read More

  • Plato's Interpretation Of Apology By Socrates

    911 Words  | 4 Pages

    The question of whether Socrates was the only real philosopher comes from one interpretation of Plato’s writings, namely Apology. Written after Socrates was tainted with the sophistic brush, scorned by society and brought to trial. In this interpretation, it is believed that Plato derided all sophists and recognised Socrates as the only real philosopher among his contemporaries, and knew of no other who could be considered as such. I however, argue that Plato never regarded, nor defended, Socrates as the only real philosopher. Rather, he presented Socrates as one of the many ‘real’ philosophers.

    Read More

  • Research Paper On Socrates

    268 Words  | 2 Pages

    Socrates is a grotesque man who uses conundrums to confuse the youth, as well as the general public. Since childhood we have been taught about the hatred our great leaders have for Socrates. When questioned about his belief in the gods, Socrates unconvincingly uses riddles in attempt to prove that he is not an atheist. I am also concerned that Socrates claims to articulate with daimonians in contrast to the gods. The people of Athens believe in the gods; the views of this ghastly man cause misfortune to the rest of us because he alleges to be a gift from god.

    Read More

  • Theories Of Cratylus

    884 Words  | 4 Pages

    For Socrates, gods do not speak to people unswervingly, instead they use oracles and signs (Mackenzie,

    Read More

  • Socrates Attitude And Apology: A Comparative Analysis

    944 Words  | 4 Pages

    In this written assignment, I will first summarize Socrates attitude and Voltaire attitude in brief. Then I will compare them. As a conclusion, I will compare my own philosophy with them. Socrates attitude from Apology The first point is, he use questioning technique to find out the reason behind people claim.

    Read More

More about Comparing Authority In Apology Of Socrates And Hebrew Bible

Open Document