Comparing Bandura's Bobo Doll Experiment And Its Effect On Aggression

The development of learned behaviour transpires when consideration is given between the link of observations and actions of individuals. This essay examines Bandura, Ross & Ross (1961) “Bobo Doll” experiment and its findings. It further identifies the limitations of the studies design such as selection bias, the role of race and socioeconomic background and the novelty of the Bobo Doll along with the participant’s perception of it as a toy. Additionally, it analysis the contemporary debates of Bandura et al. experiment ranging from biology issues, the setting of the test, the participants desire to please adults and the relationship connecting survival instincts with the participants aggression. Furthermore, it compares aggression and violence and the influence the role of the media, video games and violence have on children. It critically evaluates current evidence on aggression and children and discusses the impact and relevance it has in relation to Bandura et al. findings.

The theory of social learning

(1961) Bobo Doll experiment adopted the social learning model and formed an explanation for aggressive behaviour amongst children, Hart (2006) argued the study’s findings are not credible since it carried a plethora of bias. She claimed bias selection was evident as the sample children were all chosen from the Stanford Nursery School. Hence, it could be assumed their parents were most likely from Stanford University, were well-educated and white upper middle class given the era of study. Subsequently, Hart explained the study failed to identify the role of race and socioeconomic background and the impact this had on studies results. These immeasurable elements are particularly pertinent in contemporary times when there is a considerable difference in violent rates of children belonging to different races and low socioeconomic communities. Bandura et al. study therefore failed to address these issues and threatens its internal