ipl-logo

Comparing Christian Feudalism And Islamic Caliphate

550 Words3 Pages

Christian Feudalism was a system that was based off of the land that people were tied and could move to. There were hierarchy classes that would impact your rights and responsibilities. These hierarchies are evident in both systems. A difference that Islamic Caliphate had from Christian Feudalism was that it was based off of trade and not land. The system that had better definition, rights, and responsibilities was the Christian system of Feudalism.

Citizenship in Feudalism was having rights and responsibilities. Every person, no matter what class was in charge of things and gave things in return. This same definition of citizenship is found in Islamic Caliphate. But, a difference that is evident between the two systems was that there …show more content…

If they were in the Feudal system, they might be in the rank 2 with lords, nobles, or barons. This change in rankings makes Christian Feudalism better in definition. Not only is Caliphate not as superior in definition, they were not as good in rights as in Feudalism. The rights in Feudalism was based on the classes that people were in. While in Islamic Caliphate, peoples’ rights were based on their classes as well. But, people in Feudalism had more rights and were allowed to do more things than in Caliphate. Even though Islamic Caliphate allowed people to move to other muslim lands, people were able to do most anything they wanted to do in Feudal Europe. Sometimes peasants had to get permission to do things like marry, but they were usually able to do a lot of things. An example of the more rights people could get would be between women in Caliphate and female serfs in Feudalism. Women in Feudal times were able to help with the work and didn’t have to stay at home all of the time and take care of kids. But, Caliphate women just had the right to take care of the kids and do household chores. Finally, Feudalism also possessed people having more fair and better responsibilities. Even though Caliphates

Show More
Related

  • Compare And Contrast Byzantine Empire And Islamic Caliphates

    620 Words  | 3 Pages

    Two new empires rose in the Mediterranean and middle east; The Byzantine Empire & the Islamic Caliphates, the Byzantine Empire was run on Christianity while the Caliphates was run by the teachings of Muhammad and the holy book the Quran. While both the Byzantine Empire and the Islamic Caliphates had major divides in their religion and also state, and they both recognized their head of state (Ceaser or Caliph respectively) also as a head religious leader, they based their political rulings from different sources, Byzantines’ from its Roman predecessor and the Islamic Caliphate from the Quran and Muhammad’s life and teachings. In both Empires, religion and politics worked had in hand, as the political leaders were also established as the head religious leaders. As their respective states both believed that religion, it gave the leaders lots of justification for different rulings and movements, such as expansion.

    Read More

  • How Did The Life Of The Middle Ages Ap Euro Dbq

    534 Words  | 3 Pages

    These relationships were called feudalism (Doc. 1). Feudalism and the Church greatly contributed to the social, economic, and political life in Europe in the Middle Ages. “Feudalism was a political, economic, and social system which included kings, nobles, knights, and serfs (Doc. 1).” Every position or status had a job that benefitted another ranking (Doc. 1). For example, a king grants land to nobles, nobles granted land to knights, and knights grant land to serfs (Doc. 1).

    Read More

  • Middle Ages Dbq Essay

    357 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Middle Ages was a period that lasted from about 500 to 1500(OI). There were kings and queens, nobles, knights, and peasants (Doc. 1). People were treated and respected differently according to their class(OI). There were special relationships and responsibilities that everyone had. In the Middle Ages feudalism affected people’s lives economically, socially, and politically.

    Read More

  • Political Power Dbq

    482 Words  | 2 Pages

    Source B, "Chart of Medieval European feudalism," and source c, "Map of the spread of Islam" are both connected to the power of political. After reading the details in Source B, it is clear that  there was a social pyramid to show who was on the top and bottom, the money range of all the people, and what they did. The head of the social pyramid was the king, the king had all the power, he has all the money, and makes the rules. The next person was the lords and they were military aids and they were loyal. The second to last person on the pyramid was the knights.

    Read More

  • Bubonic Plague Dbq

    910 Words  | 4 Pages

    However, this could be better seen in their form of government. Feudalism was a system that had land owners at the top (Kings and lords) and those who worked the land and keep the community safe at the bottom. It was basically impossible to move between social classes, and a desire to keep the rich with the rich meant that one couldn’t marry into money It was a social, economic, political, and legal system that stood in place for hundreds of years. The system, however meant that the government was weak, and it rarely stretched far; the larger the kingdom, the harder it was to keep it working. It also meant there were a lot of poor people living in the fifteen hundreds.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Tokugawa Japan And Medieval Europe

    687 Words  | 3 Pages

    Underneath the nobles and barons, there are knights that are trained from the age of 7. In return for service to the nobles and barons, they are given grants of land. The peasants and serfs are on the bottom of the social system, there are peasants who farm the land in return for shelter and protection (history.com). This compares with

    Read More

  • Age Of Faith And The Middle Ages Dbq

    835 Words  | 4 Pages

    Feudalism is a system of governing and landholding. Nobles were able to use land that belonged to the king and in return, the nobles pledged their loyalty and military services to them ( doc 1 ). The feudal system was based on rights and obligations. The manor was the economic side of the feudal system. The manor was a system where the lord’s lands was taken care of by his serfs ( doc 2 ).

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Japanese And European Feudal System

    788 Words  | 4 Pages

    The societies of Tokugawa Japan (c.1603-1867C.E.) and medieval Europe (c.1000-1500C.E.) had two things in common; a feudal system. A feudal system is something that features hierarchies or social structures. The feudal system normally starts with a religion, which is at the very top of the social pyramid, then it’s the King or monarch for Europe and the shogun for Japan, then there are the nobles for Europe and the daimyos for Japan. As we go down the pyramid there are the warriors, like the knight in Europe and the samurai in Japan, then there are the peasants. The peasants were included in both eras and are at the lowest part of the pyramid.

    Read More

  • Why Did Absolute Monarchs Grow Their Power In The 1600s

    674 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the 1500s and the 1600s the feudal system was beginning to fall. Different countries were trying new different types of governments instead of the dysfunctional feudal system. The feudal system consisted of many different nobles ruling over their own land. It was not a uniform system of ruling over the country. There were small city-states run by a singular ruler.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Byzantine Empire And Medieval Europe

    829 Words  | 4 Pages

    The medieval society in Europe and Byzantine Empire had common similarities that included supreme church leadership although they had varying denominations in Christianity. Although most of their cultural practices were acquired from Greeks, they considered themselves Romans. Their major differences were in the kind of economic and political systems that they had. In Byzantine Empire, there was a centralized system and the Emperor was the sole ruler.

    Read More

  • Islamic Caliphates Vs Byzantine Empire

    897 Words  | 4 Pages

    - The Byzantine Empire and Islamic Caliphates both used religion as a way to unite their people, and as a justification for expansion. - The Byzantine Empire and Islamic Caliphates both used religion as a way to unite their people, and as a justification for expansion. - The Byzantine Empire and Islamic Caliphates both used religion as a way to unite their people, and as a justification for expansion. - The Byzantine Empire and Islamic Caliphates both used religion as a way to unite their people, and as a justification for expansion. - The Byzantine Empire and Islamic Caliphates both used religion as a way to unite their people, and as a justification for expansion.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Byzantine Empire And Western Europe

    121 Words  | 1 Pages

    Both empires’ economies were very different. The Byzantine became one of the wealthiest empires ever, while the Western economy was an agricultural based with little trading with

    Read More

  • Women's Roles In The Middle Ages

    895 Words  | 4 Pages

    Beginning with the emergence of the Middle Ages, it is safe to say that men completely overshadowed women. The concept of the Medieval Period was taken over by thoughts of the male gender. Perhaps, it is safe to say women in the Medieval Period were neglected Not only did the women lack appreciation, they were also stripped of some of the most basic rights that men possessed. Unfair laws at the time stated that women could not marry without their parents’ consent,and to make matters worse, they also couldn’t divorce their husbands. Another outrageous law stated that women could not inherit land if she had surviving brothers .

    Read More

  • Differences In The Expansion Of Christianity And Islam

    477 Words  | 2 Pages

    While both Islam and Christianity were spread Christianity had more governments in control than Islam. The Christians and Islam each believed that there is only one true God that sends down a messenger

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Feudal System

    174 Words  | 1 Pages

    The control of the different types of classes, nobles, knights, and pheasants. Second Paragraph: The drawbacks and cons of the Feudal system. Third Paragraph: The benefits that the feudal system offers to each class.

    Read More

More about Comparing Christian Feudalism And Islamic Caliphate

Open Document