In Michel Foucault’s book Discipline and Punish, he discusses the history of the modern penal system. He seeks to analyze punishment in its social context, and to examine how changing power relations affected punishment. there is a section of the text titled “Panopticism”. The idea of this excerpt is to exemplify disciplinary power. It is shown through Jeremy Bentham’s vision of this building, a prison, that models the idea that individuals can be controlled and supervised efficiently. It aims to reform the individual and deprive him of his freedom. The building is a very organized structure that is extremely well thought out. Everything and everyone is in the correct place and when it all comes together it works out ideally.
Bentham really
…show more content…
The peripheral building is divided into cells that each have two windows; one on the outside, and one corresponding to the windows of the tower. The idea of this set up is that the window on the outside allows the light to cross the cell from one end to the other. By using the backlighting like this, one can observe from the tower, while standing against the light, the shadows of the prisoners in the cells. Bentham uses the the simile, “They are like so many cages, so make small theaters, in which each actor is alone, perfectly individualized and constantly visible” (200). He portrays the prisoners like this because they are all consistently being watched as though they are performers at a show. It allows officials to recognize something immediately. It’s main goal is to reverse the idea of the encasement, deprivation of light, and hiding. Instead, giving the individuals full lighting and knowledge of a supervisor. Bentham created this building to avoid compact masses of people that were found in places of confinement. Each individual is confined to his own cell from which he is prevented from coming into contact with his companions due to side walls, and is seen from the front by the
“The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984” The article, “The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984” (2015), written by Eric Girault, persuades the audience that the enactment of the law did not reduce crime in societies, but was misappropriated, which caused a negative impact on families and their communities. Girault describes this by sharing his personal anecdote on receiving a harsh prison sentence for a non-violent crime as a first time offender. He uses trustworthy resources in order to substantiate his claim. Girault’s intended audience for this piece of writing is the general public, specifically those that lack knowledge of the law and its due process.
However, as many of these institutions began to change and reform prison sentences, many still viewed punishment techniques as “coercive forms of control” (Wright, N/D, p 318). Even though, prisons are meant to control inmates every movement, they are also abusing that power in separating
The first aspect relates to the social control imposed by the upper class upon lower classes and those who do not integrate into society. The textbook classified this as the conflict view; the upper class uses the law as an instrument to maintain their own power while controlling and in the context of this article, confining and expelling those who violate long-held values and societal roles. Judges usually come from the upper class, and their sentences reflect their bias against those unlike them. Consequently, these sentences must be dispensed in a way to create a deterrent effect. While it is easy to ascribe these increased sentences as specific deterrence for offenders, a closer look reveals their true purpose of general deterrence.
The Criminal Justice system is one of the most important vessels within society due to its role in ensuring that society is abiding by its laws and holding those who transgress these laws to account. Despite its crucial role in society, it has also been under some scrutiny in regards to how effective it actually is, which results in arguments that it doesn’t properly fulfil its job as a carrier of justice. A focus on the criminal justice system is a subject of interest because it helps us understand the tension within society between individual rights and freedoms. (Schmalleger, F. and Koppel, T, 1999) Thus, this essay will be arguing that the criminal justice system is indeed broken.
In Ma Huan's account on Champa, he vividly described the different levels of punishment executed to people who breaks the law. The punishments are ranked from thrashing on the back for light offences, to cutting nose or hand for serious offences, to burning a scar on the face for adultery, and lastly to sitting on a boat that will protrude from the criminal's mouth for heinous offences (Ma, 119). The punishments reveal the strict enforcement of law as a sign to impose fear to scare people from committing crimes. Furthermore, the treatments of the criminal reflect that the sense of humanity and human rights are not as strong because brutality toward the criminal is allowed. Furthermore, the punishment enforced in Calicut is very similar.
P. (2010). The rise of neoliberal penality in the United States. In C. Clarkson & R. Morgan (Eds.), The politics of penal reform (pp. 13-33). Routledge. Harrison, P. M., & Beck, A. J. (2006).
The late 19th century brought about the first secure idea of penal reform- education through trade. Specified treatment according to each offender’s personality was also introduced. However, the 1960s
An American writer, Herbert Packer, identified two ends of a spectrum of possible approaches to criminal justice. On one side, there is crime control, with the main goal being the repression of criminal conduct. This model focuses on efficiency and strictness of punishments as the means of maintaining general regard for the criminal law. Wrongdoers would fear potential consequences of their acts which could result in general decrease in crime. However, this approach poses certain problems.
The title of “Emerging Scholars” was given to a group of ethnic individuals with varying backgrounds that made them struggle, but ultimately, the students were strong enough to achieve what they had always wanted, a promising future. A required reading for these students enrolled in the University of Massachusetts’ 190R class was titled The Working Poor: Invisible in America by David K. Shipler, a book reminiscing numerous sociological books that are composed of a series of interviews for the sake of proving/disproving a theory. The theory this time was how the poor are not always unemployed and are still struggling in America in numerous different ways, in home life, health, education and more. There were many daunting tales told in Shipler’s
It is impossible for us to know unless we have been warned beforehand. The possibility of it all is the scariest part. In “Panopticism,” Michael Foucault explores the Panopticon and its appearance in modern society. The main effect of the Panopticon when referring to prisons is to “induce in the inmate a state of conscious and permanent visibility that assures the automatic functioning of power” where “power
The thorough analysis of text leaves no doubt that a prison is a model of a whole society, containing its own relations of subjugation and leadership. As well as in real life, the leadership can be either formal or informal. Prison guards and wardens represent the first one. They have formal legal appointment and
In this milestone we will be looking at a few key items of employee and labor relations. Some items that this paper will cover are things such as employee discipline, performance management and employee and labor relations. First, we will start by looking at employee discipline. Employee Discipline: Analyze punitive and nonpunitive disciplinary approaches, and explain their impacts on employee relations. When talking about employee discipline there are two schools of thought.
Summary Foucault work of “The Gentle Way in Punishment” describes the shift from the excessive force of the sovereign towards a more generalized and controlled forms of punishment. It emphasizing on transforming and improving the individual into a socius through public works and introspection. It discusses the crime and how it is dealt with in a more rehabilitating sense that specific crime need specific moral counterparts. For example, those who are lazy give the counterpart of work.
There is a worldwide trend in the use of penal imprisonment for serious offenses as capital punishment has been renounced by an increasing number of countries. Harsh punishments include capital punishment, life imprisonment and long-term incarceration. These forms of punishments are usually used against serious crimes that are seen as unethical, such as murder, assault and robbery. Many people believe that harsher punishments are more effective as they deter would-be criminals and ensure justice is served. Opposition towards harsh punishments have argued that harsher punishments does not necessarily increase effectiveness because they do not have a deterrent effect, do not decrease recidivism rates and do not provide rehabilitation.
(A) Pedagogical Systems which strictly demand that in exchange for implantations within its student bodies and aptitudes that conduce to proliferative (production) that they exhibit a generalized docility and obedience. In my first reading of Michel Foucault’s book Discipline and Punishment, I looked at the penal system specifically the prison system as the beginning of the development of the disciplinary society. But through looking at the other works of Foucault and after reassessing Discipline and Punishment I realized it was not that the prison system was the start of a disciplinary society rather it brings to question why the transition of prison systems in the late 18th century and in the beginning of the 19th century; a transition from