Comparing George Orwell's 1984 And The Last Man In Europe

''IN a free society,'' composed the French savant Montesquieu, ''it is not generally critical that people reason well, it is adequate that they reason; from their individual thought, opportunity is conceived.''

Precisely two centuries later, in his advanced novel ""1984,"" the English political writer George Orwell gave a disastrous delineation of what the world would be without the opportunity to think. Orwell had the goal to call his book ''The Last Man in Europe,'' as a tribute to the crucial quality that recognized man from the his general surroundings, in particular his capacity to think for himself.

Winston, the primary character of the novel, lives in a nation where individual believed is banned, where just the pioneer, huge Brother, is permitted to reason and to choose. Goaded by his regular requirement for reflection and discriminating examination, Winston thinks that it hard not to make utilization of his characteristic gifts. He begins scrutinizing the insight of enormous Brother and moves ideally toward his own freedom. However, in his battle for liberation he remains solitary. The vast mass of

""1984"" depicts a world partitioned between three States, each of them sovereign and under totalitarian principle. Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia are not nations in the customary feeling of the world, they are combinations of force in which dependable and all-capable Big Brothers principle. Oceania looks all that much like a developed rendition of NATO, at any rate in its topography. Eurasia is clearly the Russian zone of impact, and Eastasia the Far East. At the season of the production of the novel, the North Atlantic organization together was being framed, Russia had entered the weapons contest and China was still in the grasp of common war, yet it was at that point clear that Mao Tse-Tung would crush the crippled multitudes of the