ipl-logo

Comparing Philosophies Of Locke And Thomas Hobbes, By John Locke

1116 Words5 Pages

In chapter 1 Locke states it is practically impossible for anyone to claim they received a God given right to rule because no one has capability of Adam. On the other hand political power is the ability to make laws which may include a penalty of death in the event those laws are broken. Locke also explains in chapter one that use of the community to actually keep the community safe is the absolute best practice primarily because political power is simply for the good of the public. I would agree with the part of chapter 1 that states the best way to protect the community is through the use of the community. It makes me think of community policing. For example, police officers have an extensive list of responsibilities. However, through the use of community advocates and assistance they are able to expand their control and responsibilities to individuals not employed by the police force. This will then control things such as community burglaries.
In chapter 2 Locke speaks to the state of nature. This chapter states that men are naturally …show more content…

John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, although both are political theorists, differ greatly. For example in regard to the state of nature Locke believes that man is in fact a social animal whereas Hobbes thinks otherwise. They also differ in terms of their stance on the state of nature. Locke feels that men mostly are honored by their obligations. He agrees that most men are for the most part exist in peace. Hobbes, on the other hand, believes that man would live a miserable life of being poor in a society with high amounts of fear or danger. Lastly, the two theorists differ in terms of the social contract. Locke believes that man has every right to life and impartial protection of the state. Hobbes believes that if man simply does what he is expected or told to do then he in fact is safe. In the event he does not, he should fear the consequences set before him. (page 715, Sections 12-15)(Page 715 Sections 8-12) (pages

Show More
Related

  • Similarities Between John Locke And Thomas Jefferson

    180 Words  | 1 Pages

    John Locke believed in life, liberty, and property and Thomas Jefferson believed in life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. You can already see they had both had the same view point , they both believed in democracy, the people had the right to overthrow a government if they feel like if there are abusing their rights since they are supposed to protect the people’s rights, and they both believed all men were created equal. The differences they had were that John Locke believed people had the right to happiness, believed the separation of powers through legislative and executive branches, and believed in the privacy for people’s personal affairs. While Thomas Jefferson believed people had the right for happiness, he also referred the government

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast John Locke And The Declaration Of Independence

    1002 Words  | 5 Pages

    There may also be some differentiating ideas regarding these two sources. An example of this may be that, even though Jefferson and Locke agreed that the people should be able to overthrow the government if their rights were encroached upon, Hobbes believed that this would lead to a state of nature, which wouldn’t end greatly. The first way that the Declaration of Independence and

    Read More

  • John Locke's Concept Of Justice

    1751 Words  | 8 Pages

    The State of Nature, although a state wherein there is no civil authority or government to punish people for transgressions against laws, is not a state without morality. To Locke, persons are assumed to be equal to one another in such a state, and therefore equally capable of discovering and being bound by the Law of Nature. The Law of Nature, which is on Locke’s view the basis of all morality, and given to us by God, commands that we not harm others with regards to their life, health, liberty, or possessions. This is because we all belong equally to God, and because we cannot take away that which is rightfully His, we are prohibited from harming one another. So, the State of Nature is a state of liberty where persons are free to pursue their own interests and plans, free from interference, and, because of the Law of Nature and the restrictions that it imposes upon persons, it is relatively peaceful.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Locke And Rousseau

    989 Words  | 4 Pages

    Jean-Jacque Rousseau - Comparisons with the above two philosophers and opinions on the State and Law. Jean Jacques Rousseau is the third philosopher I wish to discuss. He was a French-Geneva philosopher who is widely believed to have influenced the enlightenment in France and Europe. During the French revolution Rousseau was one of the most respected and popular political theorists. Rousseau believed that men in the state of nature were the most natural and free they could be before they were corrupted by the unnatural grips of civilization.

    Read More

  • Locke Vs Thomas Hobbes State Of Nature Essay

    1437 Words  | 6 Pages

    COMPARISON BETWEEN TO THOMAS HOPPES AND JOHN LOCKE VIEWS ON STATE OF NATURE Introduction Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) and John Locke (1632-1704) were both political philosophers. They are mainly known for their master pieces on political philosophy. I.e. Hobbes' Leviathan and Locke's Two Treatise of Government. Each of them has different views and perspective of the State of Nature and Social Contract.

    Read More

  • The Enlightenment Dbq Essay

    1016 Words  | 5 Pages

    Two Philosophers had similar ideas that the government should protect citizens’ rights. John Locke believed that governments only duty

    Read More

  • How Did John Locke Preserve The Federal Government

    890 Words  | 4 Pages

    independent”. According to the state of nature, no man should endanger another man’s life, well-being, freedom, or possessions. Everyone is “obligated by the laws of nature to respect the rights of every man”, according to Locke. 2. It is necessary for man to give up certain liberties under the laws of nature when entering into society.

    Read More

  • What Is John Locke's State Of Nature

    548 Words  | 3 Pages

    John Locke is an enlightened political philosopher whose explanations to his ideas remains profoundly influential. Locke believes people should have the right to do anything they want without the government enforcing them to do a task. In The Second Treatise, Locke discusses some vital concepts of his thinking, beginning with a discussion of the State of Nature. He explains that humans move from a state of nature characterized by perfect freedom and are governed by reason to a civil government in which the authority is vested in a legislative and executive power. In the State of Nature, men are born equal, to have perfect liberty to maintain.

    Read More

  • Thomas Hobbes Influence On Thomas Jefferson's Declaration Of Enlightenment

    493 Words  | 2 Pages

    There were many philosophers in the 17th and 18th century that influenced and inspired the founders of our country. For instance, John Locke believed that life, liberty, and property should be our natural rights as humans and if the government could not secure these rights then the people could get rid of them. That idea impacted Thomas Jefferson when he wrote the Declaration of Independence. This was the perfect time to develop different theories and contradictions because this was right around the time of the printing press and protestant reformation where people started to question the catholic church. Other philosophers like Thomas Hobbes, Voltaire, Montesquieu, and Rousseau impacted founders like George Washington and James Madison who have positively affected this country in many different ways.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Aristotle And John Locke

    1604 Words  | 7 Pages

    Essay 1 Aristotle and John Locke both believe humans were not created to live alone but instead among other people of the same community. Humans are not independent beings, and those who live in isolation lack the purpose of life: becoming a citizen and exercising one 's full potential of human flourishing. According to Aristotle, the collective community or multitude of citizens coexisting with one another is happiness, whereas Locke believes that the collective community is protecting autonomy and property. Both philosophers believe that to become a citizen, one must contribute to politics with the intent of creating a better society for all. Aristotle and Locke however, have differing views on how a person accomplishes this.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Thomas Hobbes And John Locke

    1441 Words  | 6 Pages

    When comparing the two different accounts of English philosophers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke we must take into consideration a number of things such as the age in which they lived and the time in which they produced their philosophical writings. We will however find out that these two philosophers actually have a couple of things in which agree on even though most of their opinions clash. On one side we have Thomas Hobbes who lived in the time of the English Civil War (1642-1651) who provides a negative framework for his philosophical opinions in his masterpiece Leviathan and who advocates for philosophical absolutism . On the other side we have John Locke, living during the glorious revolution (1688-1689) he presents a positive attitude in his book The Second Treatise of Government and advocates for philosophical and biblical constitutionalism. It is important that we know that the state of nature describes a pre- political society prior to the social contract.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast John Locke And Adam Smith

    470 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Age of Reason In Europe, during the Age of Enlightenment or the Age of Reason, many philosophers gathered together to discuss their different but similar ideas to help shape the world we live in today. In the late 17th and 18th century, four enlightenment philosophers named John Locke, Voltaire, Adam Smith, and Mary Wollstonecraft focused on the same main idea. They believed in individual rights and presented their arguments through religion, government, economics, and equality for women.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Plato And John Locke

    1333 Words  | 6 Pages

    Only those who are born with true philosophical understanding can rule. In the Second Treatise by John Locke, Locke addresses the state of nature, which is essentially equality and freedom. Even though people have liberty, they still need to obey natural laws. On the contrary of Plato’s just city, Locke believes that absolute authority is not a civil government. A civil society is where the majority rules.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Hobbes Locke And Rousseau

    1740 Words  | 7 Pages

    Hobbes was an English philosopher, known through out the world as the author of “Leviathan” which is regarded as one of the earliest examples of the social contract theory. His writings were greatly influenced by the

    Read More

  • Thomas Hobbes Influence On Civil Government

    1252 Words  | 6 Pages

    All of them are quite interesting and different in their own ways and similar in others, they all work towards achieving a government that attracts someone’s best interest but it always tends to change according to what specific interests are. Hobbes’s wants a specific leader in an absolutism regime and Marx feels like the social classes are unequal and falls on the side of communism after the industrial revolutions and classifies that freedom and equality are not valuable anymore. But, Locke shows interest in a government that helps the people. A government that acquires the trust of a nation is what appeals to me the most and that is what Locke has shown me to desire through his work.

    Read More

More about Comparing Philosophies Of Locke And Thomas Hobbes, By John Locke

Open Document