Comparing Rhetorical Strategies In Henry V And Joan Of Arc

Both Henry V and Joan of Arc overcame numerous difficulties to become respected figures in their respective nations of England and France. Despite being leaders in the same war, their paths to prominence were very different. Classism had a large impact on these varying routes. Joan faced adversity being from a poor, unknown family, but Henry also faced different types of hardships as king. Besides their class differences, the two heroes utilized differing rhetorical strategies that best fit their situation. Although Henry did not alway carry himself with much dignity in his early years, he is portrayed as a powerful and honorable. Being a king puts him at the top of the social ladder, and garners respect from almost all below him. Along with this respect though, comes expectations. Henry is expected to be fearless and fair based upon his position in society. Henry’s speech prior to the battle of Agincourt in Act four displays the pressure put on the King, “What’s he that

This created a situation where Joan and Henry needed to use different rhetorical strategies in order to be effective. In Henry’s Speech, he appealed to the emotions of the soldiers, also known as pathos, “We would not die in that man’s company That fears his fellowship to die with us. This day is called the feast of Crispian. He that outlives this day and comes safe home, Will stand o' tiptoe when the day is named And rouse him at the name of Crispian” (Shakespeare 4.3.40-45). Henry has no need to prove himself anymore with ethos because of his already high standing in society, and he does not utilize much logic (logos) because the odds are very against the English (there is not much logic). This leaves emotional appeal. He mentions honor and brotherhood and glory in an effort to unite the troops. In this time period it is the ultimate honor to fight in a glorious battle, and Henry capitalizes upon