Comparing the justice system of Canadian with the United States legal systems we find some similarities as well differences in the form of the legal system. However, viewing the Canadian criminal justice system it is somewhat separate in its combined judicial legal system where all the courts share the same system to include Canada’s Supreme Court which has the final decision authority throughout Canada. On the other hand, the United States has two parallel and independent judicial systems. The federal judicial system applies to federal law where the state judicial system is independent at the state level. The Substantive law in both Canada as well as in the United States is the Constitutions. Canada’s Constitution is a combination of both …show more content…
In some cases, the elections are opinionated, where the judge nominee is associated furthermore has the support of a political party. Each state procedural law has its own requirement for the standards for the election of their judge. For an example, the state of California elections, any qualified lawyer is qualified to run for a seat in the judicial office at election. The procedure is that of a non-partisan which provides that if a vacancy was to arises between elections, then the governor has the approving authority to appoint the judge. Election of judges in the procedural law maintains the supervision of justice consistent with dominating the social ideology. The known problem with this type of system comes with situations that lead to social problems, mostly if the judge that was elected make his/her decisions for the sole purpose “for the vote”, ("Procedural Law," …show more content…
The creation of the night watch was from Boston in 1636, New York in 1658 lastly Philadelphia in 1700. This created policing style was not a particularly effective crime reduction procedure. These people that was selected as Watchmen more often fell asleep or where drunk on duty. From the beginning, the American policing system has been associated not to the problem of crime, but to emergencies as well as the difficulties of the United States political-economy, (Potter, 2013) The focus of the United States has been that of economics also of politics, which are not crime or crime control. Looking to the 21st century, the new emphasis has changed to science with the technology advantages in policing, as it relates to societies surveillance; there is a new movement of militarization replication in the spread of tactical teams in the policing profession. Policing has a new perspective with the emphasis on community relations through community policing. Community policing has led to the organization of stakeholders with policing agencies, (Gaines, Kappeler, and Vaughn
The case of Pittonia is not a unique one; many times throughout history countries have made the transition from authoritarian rule to democratic rule. In these transitions, however, there are many differences in how a country can go about creating a democracy. Pittonia, for example, will draw inspiration from various nations around the world and use their precedence to mold a new democracy. Federalism studied in Canada, and the quasi-federalism of Spain, are influences for the benefits of a federal government, which include regional states having the authority to govern themselves. Bicameralism is chosen for its two-part representation system, ensuring that states are proportional represented in the lower house and equally represented in the
1. Briefly discuss the four general methods of selecting state judges (appointment, partisan election, nonpartisan elections, and merit selection) and choose one in which you feel will result in the best judicial candidate, and why. When selecting a state judge the methods used are diverse compared to selecting a federal court judge since there are four general methods used, this
The cultural dimensions of Canada and the Republic of Belarus provide insight as to why the structure and nature of the judicial systems differ from one another. However, before interpreting these dimensions, it is important to note that although the Republic of Belarus was established in 1994, it resembles Russia almost entirely in terms of culture. Therefore Hofstede’s study of Russia’s Cultural Dimensions is applicable to the Republic of Belarus. The Canadian structure and nature of its judicial system can be explained due to its high level of individualism (80) and low power distance (39). The high level of individualism can explain the reason why alternative to courts are accepted in Canada.
When the Constitution Act was patriated, the role of courts in Canada changed significantly. The job of making sure that laws affecting individual rights are in accordance with the Charter now falls to them, and ultimately, the Supreme Court of Canada. Governments cannot pass laws that do not agree with the constitution - known as unconstitutional laws - because they can be stopped from ever coming into effect or getting ‘striked down’ by the courts. PM Trudeau had been a voice for a new Constitution since his first election campaign in 1965, in which he said, “I believe a constitution can permit the coexistence of several cultures and ethnic groups within a single state.” The Constitution Act of 1982 was also dedicated to shaping Canada’s independence.
The Texas and federal court systems are integral components of the American legal system, but they share both similarities and differences that distinguish them from one another. In this essay, I will discuss two similarities and two differences between these two court systems, examining their structures, method of selection, and types of cases heard. Firstly, the hierarchical structure is a fundamental similarity shared by both the Texas and federal court systems. Both systems employ a similar hierarchical structure that commences with trial courts and progresses through intermediate appellate courts to the highest court at the top.
The History of law has helped form Canadian law today. Considering this we still have kept many of the concepts of law that were established long before. However, we have moved away from some former practices. The
A complex organization of Federal and State governmental divisions establishes the US Legal System. Every state has its own court system, plus the federal government one, fifty-two in total. Each state has its own constitution, governmental structure, legal codes and judiciary system.
To what extent have police forces developed throughout the Twentieth century? Many changes have occured to police forces throughout the twentieth century. Rapid technology developments have effected the way the police work, providing them with new and increasingly more complex equipment. Wheres the nineteenth century police officer had neither a radio or a walkie-talkie, reling heavily on a whistle to alert collegues to the scene of a crime; two-way radios had been introduced in the 1920s.
Judicial corruption refers to corruption related improper of judges, through receiving or giving bribes, not proper sentencing of convicted criminals, bias in the hearing and judgement of arguments and other such misconduct, any act through which workers in the justice system are negatively influenced that affects the impartiality of judicial proceedings for the purpose of obtaining an unlawful benefit for themselves or other persons. There are two types of such negative influences upon justice: The first incorrect influences affecting the independence of justice as a system or the independence of judges as individuals stress factors acting on justice. The analysis of safety measure that fight such reasons and that anticipate to protect the functional independence of the system and the individual independence of the judge, for example life tenure, presence of a judicial council. Here we may embrace, but are not restricted to, political involvement in the
THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM OF CANADA The judicial system (judiciary or court system) is the state machinery for resolving conflicts between individuals or individuals and the state, according to law. It can also be define as the system of courts that interprets and applies the law in the name of the state. A distinctive feature of the Canadian judicial system is its unitary character which distinguishes it from other federal nation including the United States which have a dual court system. This kind of system separates legislative powers along federal lines by creating federal and state courts for federal and state laws respectively.
Within the last three decades or so, American policing has made great strides and has seen significant changes in both it’s practice and thinking. The study and interpretation of current practices, new theories and perspectives on policing, in combination with the worlds technological advancements have all brought about these changes in todays policing. In fact, this past decade has proven to be the most innovative. “The following information is a brief overview of the key elements and research results for the most notable police strategies; the standard model of policing, community policing, broken windows policing, hot spots policing, Compstat, and problem-oriented policing” (Santos, 2005).
Judicial selection is an intriguing topic as there are multiple ways that judges take their seat on the bench. The United States Constitution spells out how federal judges are selected and leaves it up to the individual states to establish their means for selecting judges. In federal courts, judges are appointed and it varies between appointment and election for state courts. The purpose of this paper is to examine the differences between appointments and elections (as well as the multiple types of elections) and to give an opinion as to which is the better alternative. Federal judges are appointed by the President of the United States and are confirmed on the advice and consent of the United States Senate.
In America 's legal system there are five sources of law. Those include constitutions, pieces of legislation, executive orders, rules and regulations made by administrative bodies, and judicial decisions. They each have a very distinguish relationship with each other. Each source go together hand in hand to make up constitution and it 's amendments when it comes to the regulations of the law. Also when discussing which is better for today 's usage, common law or code law the choice is obvious.
In the criminal justice system, there are three major components. They are the police, the courts, and the corrections. Each one of the components has a role to play in the system. The police are in charge of arresting and investigating crimes. The courts are charged with the responsibility of punishing offenders while the corrections implement the court rulings.
Israeli Legal System vs. the U.S.'s Legal System The synthesis of the legal system permits the Israeli Supreme Court judges to pass judgment on a more extensive scale. The judges have the discretion to give rulings according to deductive thinking.1 A peculiar aspect in the Israeli legal structure is that case laws of a court guide the lower courts including the supreme court decisions which control the lower court, however the lower courts are not bound by the decisions. There are panels in the Supreme Court which hear cases, and none of the panels is obligated to adhere to the decisions of another panel.2 The different panels at the Israeli Court system hasten the hearing process unlike the US, where the panel of judges is fixed.3 In Israel,