Comparing The Leadership Styles Of General Lee And Colonel Chamberlain

682 Words3 Pages

General Lee and Colonel Chamberlain had many similarities as well as differences in their style of leadership. Their leadership styles played a big role in the outcome of the Battle of Gettysburg. General Lee was often viewed as a mastermind. He enjoyed sitting down and coming up with a general procedure, and arranging his units before going to war. When it came on to achieving his goals, he almost close to never falls short of doing so. Prior to the “Battle of Chancellorsville” in 1863, the Accomplice Armed forces was organized in a two-corps arrangement, with commanders James Longstreet and “Stonewall” Jackson. When dealing with this altercation, commander Lee had a “hands-off” approach when dealing with these two commanders. An approach …show more content…

In a brilliant show of authority, Colonel Chamberlain passed on his aim, clarified the errand at hand and gave his men a solidarity of reason. Although his assets were not idealizing, the timing of the up and coming fight was destitute, and their spirits were down, he tackled the qualities that these modern troopers could bring to his regiment. Colonel Chamberlain won a Congressional Award of Honor for his gallant stand on Small Circular Beat and Huge Circular Beat against the Confederates. His 20th Maine was the extraordinary cleared out of the Union Armed force. He was a instructor from Bowdoin College. One of his companions was Harriet Beecher Stowe. Robert E. Lee was a southern man of his pledge whose father, Harry was a close sidekick of George Washington. Upper course respectable men needed to behave culturally. He went to West Point. The aftermath and the outcome of the battle of Gettysburg for general lee and colonel chamberlain. The Outcome for general lee was that his trusts of a triumphant interruption of the North dashed, Lee held up for a Union counterattack on July 4, however it never came. That night, in overpowering precipitation, the Assistant basic pulled back his devastated equipped power …show more content…

Regardless of the way that the careful Meade would be censured for not looking for after the enemy after Gettysburg, the battle was a beating overcome for the Alliance. Union losses in the battle numbered 23,000, while the Confederates had lost a couple of 28,000 men– more than 33% of Lee's equipped power. The North celebrated while the South lamented, its trusts for outside affirmation of the Alliance destroyed. The outcome for Colonel Chamberlain in the Gettysburg was after clash of Gettysburg, Chamberlain was given control of a detachment in the Fifth Corps and would hold it until the finish of the war. All through the war, Chamberlain was harmed six times, most dreadfully at Petersburg in June 1864. Tolerating this injury to be mortal, Congress propelled Chamberlain to the rank of Brigadier Normal. Chamberlain, in any case, would survive the injury, and come back to the front to have a basic influence in the Appomattox Crusade.

Open Document