Comparison between Common Law and Civil Law
Law is an essential element for any civilization. Laws in general are the rules set and enforced by an authority that we must follow. The main purpose of these rules is to solve a specific problem or conflict between two parties or more. Furthermore, laws were there long time ago and still exist until this day to help solve various cases and scenarios we see and hear about in our daily life. Law can be categorized into two general categories; which are common law and civil law. Each one of these two differs from the other in many aspects. We can differentiate between common law and civil law through many key points that I will highlight in the coming paragraphs. First of all, the legal system,
…show more content…
The common law systems have evolved primarily in England and its former colonies, including all but one US jurisdiction and all but one Canadian jurisdiction. For the most part, the English-speaking world operates under common law. On the contrary, the civil law tradition developed in continental Europe at the same time and was applied in the colonies of European imperial powers such as Spain and Portugal. Common law is a peculiar to England in its origin. Until the Norman Conquest, there were different rules for different regions of the country. But as the laws and the country began to unite, a common law was created based on customs and rulings across the country. These rules developed organically and were rarely written down. European rulers on the other hand ruled on Roman law, and a compilation of rules issued by the emperor Justinian in the 6th century that was rediscovered in 11th-century Italy. With the Enlightenment of the 18th century, rulers from different continental countries took to comprehensive legal …show more content…
The common law system sources are: Constitution, legislation – Statutes and subsidiary legislation, judicial precedent – common law and equity, custom, convention and international Law. Similarly, we have the civil law system sources which are: Constitution, legislation – statutes and subsidiary legislation, custom, international and law, it may be argued that judicial precedents and conventions also function within Continental systems, but they are not generally recognized. The two systems have similar sources of law, both have statutes and both have case law, they approach regulation and resolve issues in different ways from different perspectives. In conclusion, both common law and civil law systems serve the same purpose. The common law may differ from the civil law in the methods and procedures of enforcing the law. They both use rules and regulations to cope with deferent situations and to insure the enforcement of
Laws play a very important role in the up rising of a nation. Justice is the value of those laws from an impartial standpoint. The laws consisted of 282 provisions arranged under multiple subjects from family, personal property to trade and business. These laws established penalties with the philosophy that the punishment should fit the crime.
MILLERSBURG — Despite a plea for leniency expressed by the victim, a Sugarcreek man was unable to overcome a long history of criminal convictions and a bond violation when a Holmes County judge on Wednesday sentenced him to prison for making unwanted phone calls and threats to several members of a family over a period of months. David Lamar Schrock, 43, of 2578 State Route 39, previously pleaded guilty in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to two counts of telephone harassment and one count of menacing by stalking. In exchange for his guilty plea, the state agreed to dismiss two additional counts of telephone harassment and three counts of menacing by stalking. The charges are made more serious because Schrock was convicted, in January 2016,
From the 13th to 15th century, liberty, justice, and equality were not very common. During this time the feudal system was already very well established. Kings ruled by divine right which meant they were appointed by God, but in 1215 the barons began to question these rights. The barons rebelled against King John and the Magna Carta soon served as a peace treaty. Many major documents in history have have used the Magna Carta’s ideology and developed them into new sets of laws pertaining to all people.
The laws of the Roman state, which were observed by subjects for about 13 centuries, from Romulus to Justinian. The laws by Justinian were said to be very strict. The law that was contained in the Corpus Juris Civilis, which is the name given to to Justinian’s legislative works and makes them different
Justinian decided to review the old Roman laws in 582 AD. Rome had thousands of rules that were unorganized and ordered around the Romans' lifestyles, so Justinian took all of those laws and recruited ten individuals to study through 1,600 books of Roman law and create a more simple legal code that summarized and grouped all of the laws. This was known as Justinian's Code. The Justinian Code had over 5,000 rules and numerous sets of laws that restored order to the empire. This legal code that Justinian created demonstrates that he is a good leader because it shows that he cares about the law and wants the laws to be fair to everyone.
Imagine where we would be without Justinian 's set of laws that shaped our basic idea of how laws and justice would be
The relationship between the law and society affects everyone and everything. How the law is written and how it is acted upon in society are two different things. It is imperative, therefore, that we as citizens pay attention to and understand the importance of the relationship between the law and society as it affects both our own lives and the lives of those around us. We engage in and witness the power of the law and society everyday. The law is personal, however, the law is also discretionary depending on where you look.
The laws stand as a basic understanding of right from wrong and allowed civilizations to keep the most peace among their people as they
Roman law, was effective in the Eastern Roman Empire (331-1453), and is also the basis of our legal system, civil system which most countries apply, from Europe to Latin America. Even English and North American Common law also were influenced by Roman law, particularly in the legal glossary - stare decisis, culpa in contrahendo, pacta sunt servanda. The primary document that all Roman laws were included was the Twelve Tables. This attempt was the earliest of Romans to create a Code of Law and is also the earliest (surviving) piece of literature coming from the Romans.
[5] Common law works in a different way, the judges rather than the Parliament make common law or ‘judge-made law’. Considering criminal and civil cases, the judges take decisions based on the stare decisis principle (Latin “to stand by things decided”, the legal principle of determining points in litigation according to precedent [4]), deliver rulings and create precedents, thus applying the law to real life situations. Therefore, the value of the precedent is very high in the English Common Law system. The strengths of common law
It was revealed by a survey carried out by National Consumer Council how unhappy and unsatisfactory people were with the Civil Justice System. The main weaknesses identified were that the system being too slow, too complicated for ordinary people to understand and too outdated and costly. In the continued criticism of the system Lord Woolf was appointed by the government who came up with suggestions and solutions to overcome these problems. As a result Civil Procedure Rules came into force on 26th April 1999 introducing different reforms to the system. The rationale of the reforms was to avoid litigation and promote settlement between the parties at dispute.
An issue in theoretical basis on what should prevail or which is supreme between International Law or Municipal Law (national law) is usually presented as a competition between monism and dualist. But in modern approach there is now the theory of coordination or is also called Harmonization theory that rejects the presumption of the other two theoretical concept, monism and dualism. The monist view asserts the international law’s supremacy over the municipal law even in matters within the internal or domestic jurisdiction of a state. While it is true that the international law defines the legal existence of states as well of the validity of its national legal order, the dualist asserts the international law is an existing system that is completely separated from municipal or national law. That dictates the
1. Explain why it might be difficult to effectively study law following the positive transition. What are the advantages and disadvantages of a humanistic approach to the study of law? Studying law is relatively difficult as the degree holds much of the responsibilities to sort out the issue concerned with the society (ANU, 2014).
Material Sources: Material sources of law includes: • Historical Sources: Suppose no statutes exist, then court refers to common law or case law. The principles or set of rules framed traditionally in an unauthorized or in an unofficial way, but are adopted and endorsed as rules, and decisions are made on them as well. Such sources are outlined as COMMON LAW OF EQUITY. The essential characteristic of common law is that it ascends as precedent. When the parties have disagreement on the law, then court looks for previous rulings and precedents on it.
Law is present in our daily life and in everything we do. We cannot think a second without law. Whatever we can see around us everything is connected with the law. Sometimes we can see it and sometimes we cannot see but feel it. Law is not just a thing to obey for yourself but making a peaceful society.