Comparison Of Andrew Jackson, John Marshall And The Trail Of Tears
Andrew Jackson, John Marshall, and The Trail of Tears
There have been many dark times in our History as Americans. Among them is the Trail of Tears,brought upon by Andrew Jackson, which exiled the Indians from the American south and resulted in the death of thousands on the way to Oklahoma. Before this trying time there was speculation within the supreme court whether to treat the Native tribes as a sovereign foreign nation or as a dependent entity within the United States. I will discuss how these decisions came to be, the reactions to said decisions, and the aftermath of these rulings which inevitably leads to the Trail of Tears.
In June 1830, Chief John Ross went to defend Cherokee rights before the U.S. Supreme Court after the state of Georgia passed legislation that John Ross claimed to "go directly to annihilate the Cherokees as a political society." Georgia retaliated, claiming that the Cherokee nation could not sue since they were not a foreign nation with a constitution, therefore the case should not be brought to court in the first place. This brought upon the Supreme court case Cherokee Nation v. Georgia in 1831. The conclusion of this case, decided upon by Judge John Marshall was that "the relationship of the tribes to the United States resembles that of a ‘ward to its guardian '." I disagree with this outcome. The Cherokee people had lived in Georgia before the Americans for thousands of years. They were established and organized long before the colonist set
Andrew Jackson's Response To The Trail Of Tears
1308 Words | 6 PagesAs a part of the Indian Removal Act of 1830, Native American people were forcefully assembled and made to endure one of the longest walks from Georgia to Oklahoma on what has become known as the Trail of Tears. President Andrew Jackson’s motives for movement of the Native people to a new territory was to eliminate the Native race by stripping the victims of their vital resources needed for basic survival. After 178 years of expansion and growth in the United States of America, the circumstances for Native Americans remain unchanged. President Jackson’s sentiments have permeated the present society in issues associated with the physical and emotional fight to decolonize. Decolonization is both the individual and communal effort to regenerate
Research Paper On John Ross A Cherokee Indian Chief
719 Words | 3 PagesHe went to the Supreme Court and won against the US Gov’t. The Court agreed that the Cherokees had rights to the land, but the president would not back down. Then in 1835, a few renegade Cherokees wrote up a false treaty and gave it to Congress. Congress liked it so they passed the treaty by one vote; this treaty gave the Cherokees land and money in Oklahoma in exchange for their Georgia/Alabama land.
Comparison Of Native Resistance Towards US Government And Settlers
817 Words | 4 PagesMajor Ridge, a prominent Cherokee leader, believed in partial assimilation specifically involving education so the Cherokee could gain leverage when using the American legal system. Sequoyah, another protuberant Cherokee, developed a written version of the Cherokee language which allowed them to translate important texts such as the Bible and U.S. Constitution. This gave the Cherokee a more thorough understanding of the United States government. The advancements of having a translatable language and mixed blood/educationally assimilated Cherokee with knowledge of how the U.S. government functioned proved to be quite beneficial when defending their ownership of property. The attempted to write their own Constitution and claim they were a sovereign nation, but were quickly overruled by Georgia state laws.
Compare And Contrast Cherokee Vs Georgia
500 Words | 2 PagesSince they were foreigners, in their eyes, the Courts should not be hearing the case. With this belief, according to Georgia, the Cherokee Nation had no
The Evidence That Could Be Used To Support The Ideals Of The Declaration Of Independence Dbq
554 Words | 3 PagesThis evidence supports my subclaim because the original amount of land that the Cherokee Nation owned was taken away over time by white settlers. Document 2, “Cherokee Nation of Indians, Letter to Congress, February 22, 1838. Printed in The Vermont Telegraph newspaper on April 4, 1838” is the most reliable document showing discrimination because it was written by members of the Cherokee tribe who clearly state forms if
Essay On Cherokee Vs Georgia
373 Words | 2 PagesCherokee trade with the English colonies of Georgia and South Carolina had increased, the in the 1740s, the Cherokee tribes developed a hunting and farming lifestyle. In 1775, one Cherokee Nation was described as having one hundred houses. Each house had a garden, orchard, hothouse, and hog
Andrew Jackson Indian Removal
656 Words | 3 PagesIn May of 1830, President Andrew Jackson signed The Indian Removal Act into law.32 This law allowed the president to grant lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for tribal lands within State borders. Few Natives moved peacefully, most resisted the new relocation policy.35 Approximately 125,000 Natives of the ‘Five Civilized Tribes’ – Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, Seminole and Cherokee, lived on the millions of acres in Georgia, Tennessee, North Carolina and Florida.36 As new settlers were flooding into the United States, prime farm land was coveted by them.37 Georgia passed laws limiting Native Peoples sovereignty and rights and the Natives used the courts to regain their rights.38 In a few cases, such as Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831)
The Impact Of Andrew Jackson's Trail Of Tears
1144 Words | 5 PagesChief Justice of the Supreme Court John Marshall agreed that the Cherokee Nation was a distinct society but not that it was a foreign nation. In 1838 and 1839, as a major speciality of Andrew Jackson 's Indian evacuation strategy, the Cherokee country was compelled to surrender its properties east of the Mississippi River and to relocated to a territory in show day Oklahoma. The Cherokee individuals tabbed this excursion the "Trail of Tears," as a result of its overwhelming impacts. The verbal confrontation on the bill was longed and unpleasant, for the subject of Indian evacuation touched upon various extremely intense subject matters: the established inquiry of states ' rights versus government privileges, Christian
The Trail Of Tears: Andrew Jackson's Indian Removal Act
635 Words | 3 PagesWhat is to be covered in this essay is the Critical issue, summary of The Trail of Tears, why in some ways what Andrew Jackson has done good and the many ways he had done wrong, and what he could have done to help the whites and the native Americans. Social justice is justice in terms of the distribution of wealth, opportunities, and privileges within a society. It’s important to discuss when talking about the Trail of Tears because President Andrew Jackson had had signed the Indian removal act because the Americans had thought there was gold there and they all wanted the land for that.
The Pros And Cons Of The Trail Of Tears
277 Words | 2 PagesUnder influence of president Andrew Jackson, the congress was urged in 1830 to pass the Indian Removal Act, with the goal of relocated many Native Americans in the East territory, the west of Mississippi river. The Trail of tears was made for the interest of the minorities. Indeed, if president Jackson wished to relocate the Native Americans, it was because he wanted to take advantage of the gold he found on their land. Then, even though the Cherokee won their case in front the supreme court, the president and congress pushed them out(Darrenkamp).
Andrew Jackson's Migration: The Trail Of Tears
372 Words | 2 PagesPresident Andrew Jackson passed a law that stated the removal of the Cherokee Indians. They were forced to migrate elsewhere and leave their land. Their migration was called “The Trail of Tears” because of the negative effects it had on the Cherokees. It should not have happened and the U.S. should not have allowed it because it split apart people that were unified. They already had their own laws, and every clan was recognized.
Cherokee Nation 1830 Analysis
402 Words | 2 PagesOn July 17, 1830, the Cherokee nation published an appeal to all of the American people. United States government paid little thought to the Native Americans’ previous letters of their concerns. It came to the point where they turned to the everyday people to help them. They were desperate. Their withdrawal of their homeland was being caused by Andrew Jackson signing the Indian Removal Act into law on May 28, 1830.
Trail Of Tears: The Indian Removal Act
1055 Words | 5 PagesTrail of Tears Native Americans experienced a dramatic change in the 1830s. Nearly 125,000 Native Americans who lived on inherited land from ancestors of Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Florida were all cast out by the end of the decade. The federal government forced the natives to leave because white settlers wanted an area to grow their cotton. Andrew Jackson (President of the U.S. during this time) signed into law, the Indian Removal Act, authorizing him to grant unsettled lands west of the Mississippi River in return for native lands within state borders.
Andrew Jackson And The Trail Of Tears
265 Words | 2 PagesAndrew Jackson disobeyed a direct order from the Supreme Court, which it means he was above the law. I really wonder how Americans tolerated him, at that time, he was cruel to the Indian common man. Because of him, the Native Americans have the worst end of the Trail of Tears. They are the ones who are forced out of their traditional homes and sent away on a journey of pain and death. Those who had fallen ill, most of the time died, and those who had the will to move on were able to make it to the end and start new lives.
Compare And Contrast Indian Constitution And Cherokee Constitution
170 Words | 1 PagesBeing one of the more “advanced” tribes, the Cherokee thought early about making sure they could do everything possible to create preventative measures against having their land taken away. Before there was a more serious federal discussion on removing the tribe, they were working hard to becoming a more “civilized” group of people to become more accepted by regular Americans and to better themselves. In order to both help their case and further the process of becoming civilized, they set up a constitution which closely resembled that of the US Constitution. In the Cherokee Constitution, it allowed them to set up an actual border around their territory and set up a government, both which were signs of earlier resistance against their removal
More about Comparison Of Andrew Jackson, John Marshall And The Trail Of Tears
Andrew Jackson's Response To The Trail Of Tears
1308 Words | 6 PagesResearch Paper On John Ross A Cherokee Indian Chief
719 Words | 3 PagesComparison Of Native Resistance Towards US Government And Settlers
817 Words | 4 PagesCompare And Contrast Cherokee Vs Georgia
500 Words | 2 PagesThe Evidence That Could Be Used To Support The Ideals Of The Declaration Of Independence Dbq
554 Words | 3 PagesEssay On Cherokee Vs Georgia
373 Words | 2 PagesAndrew Jackson Indian Removal
656 Words | 3 PagesThe Impact Of Andrew Jackson's Trail Of Tears
1144 Words | 5 PagesThe Trail Of Tears: Andrew Jackson's Indian Removal Act
635 Words | 3 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of The Trail Of Tears
277 Words | 2 PagesAndrew Jackson's Migration: The Trail Of Tears
372 Words | 2 PagesCherokee Nation 1830 Analysis
402 Words | 2 PagesTrail Of Tears: The Indian Removal Act
1055 Words | 5 PagesAndrew Jackson And The Trail Of Tears
265 Words | 2 PagesCompare And Contrast Indian Constitution And Cherokee Constitution
170 Words | 1 Pages