ipl-logo

Comparison Of Democracy And Genocide

291 Words2 Pages

The American’s reconciled democracy and genocide and characterize it as freedom by the people by interpreting their genocides as their manifest destiny. They also characterized democracy and genocide as freedom for their people by concurring the land of the native people, making native people’s land to American people’s land. Andrew Jackson killed many Native Americans in his past, and took command of the military in charge of killing Indians. Jackson was elected for US senator, became the judge in the Tennessee Supreme Court for six years, and after he became the President of the United States. The American people looked up to Jackson because he was their leader, which was why Americans accepted the genocide of indigenous people. Genocide

Show More
Related

  • Hunger For Indian Land In Andrew Jackson's America Summary

    1391 Words  | 6 Pages

    In the article by Anthony F. C. Wallace, “The Hunger for Indian Land in Andrew Jackson’s America,” the reasons for America's need for Indian land is discussed. The purpose of this article is to explain the Indian removal that occurred under Andrew Jackson’s presidency. The thesis of this essay states that Americans kicked the Natives off of their land to fulfill a selfish desire to expand the cotton industry.           The first point Wallace uses to support his thesis is how Jackson’s financial interest in the land affected the removal of Natives.

    Read More

  • Examples Of Alienation In Night By Elie Wiesel

    1624 Words  | 7 Pages

    In 1944, a Polish-Jewish lawyer came up with the word, “genocide.” However, even seventy-five years later, many people still debate what factors go into making a genocide. Of course, there is mass murder, mistreatment of large groups of people, and difficult life conditions. Take the Cambodian Genocide, for example. People were tortured and killed so much during this genocide that at one of the death camps, “as few as 12 managed to survive” (Pierpaoli).

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Abuse Of Power Summary

    170 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the article “Abuse of Power: Andrew Jackson and the Indian Removal Act of 1830,” the author, Alfred A. Cave, writes about President Jackson’s abuse of power. He is arguing that Jackson abused his power when he was enforcing the Indian Removal Act. He argues that Jackson broke guarantees he made to the Indians. He uses a political methodology and uses secondary sources.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson: The Era Of The Common Man

    1960 Words  | 8 Pages

    The era of Andrew Jackson which was nicknames the era of the “common man” certainly lived up to its name. As the seventh President of the United States, Jackson had a major effect on the life of the common man, in such a way that the life of the common man would never be the same again. Jackson’s aim, after the manner in which he was defeated in the Presidential Election of 1824, despite receiving more popular votes than John Quincy Adams who took on the office, was to reduce the power and the authority of the elite. When he came into power after the 1828 election Jackson began to carry out his proposals. Jackson expanded the voting right to all men, in accordance with the Declaration of Independence of 1776 which declared that “all men are created equal” instead of just the elite.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Power Analysis

    996 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the mid-1800s the United States began to rapidly grow, the population of the whites sadly outnumbered the Indians tremendously. Due to the growth of the white Americans, they required large amounts of land in order to suit their needs and to provide for their society. President Andrew Jackson’s power influenced many of the white Americans that the land belonged to them, his power as president allowed him to forcefully move the Cherokee west of the Mississippi. The Jackson administration’s decision to remove the Cherokee Indians to lands west of the Mississippi river in the 1830s significantly changed the previous social, political, and economic policies pursued by the colonies and The United States towards the American Indian tribes.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson's Influence On Democracy

    446 Words  | 2 Pages

    Andrew Jackson was seen as a common man the voice of the people by some. By others he was King Andrew, trampling the constitution and instigating tyranny. Jackson’s presidency impacted democracy, through his use of the veto power, and his claim of Clay creating a “corrupt bargain”, which is not a turning point for a rise in democracy despite him giving white male suffrage. During Jackson’s use of executive power weakened voice of the people.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Andrew Jackson And His Indian Wars By Robert Remini

    659 Words  | 3 Pages

    Robert Remini’s Andrew Jackson and His Indian Wars is a book that makes you question Jackson's character. Remini addresses the long-standing debate of historians and scholars over whether or not Jackson was barbaric or whether he was a merciful savior that prevented the Native Americans from going extinct. Remini instead argues the opinion that Jackson was simply a man of his time. Despite this, Remini does show Jackson's inexcusable cruelty towards the Native Americans. He learned to fear and hate Indians from an early age.

    Read More

  • The Rhetoric Of Genocide

    398 Words  | 2 Pages

    History repeats itself, especially when it comes to the topic of genocide. The word “genocide” was created by a lawyer named Raphael Lemkin who combined the Greek word geno-, meaning race or tribe and the word -cide, Latin for killing. There have been a number of genocides that have occurred including, the murder of Jewish and Gypsy populations in 1944, the Rwanda genocide in 1944, and the genocide in Darfur in 2003. Genocide occurs because of propaganda, cultural expectations, and military strategies.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson: A Hero Or Villain?

    865 Words  | 4 Pages

    Andrew Jackson’s sentiment towards the Native Americans was certainly not a kind one. Manifest destiny was a popular belief among Americans, including Jackson, and he would go to the extent of forcing Native Americans out of their homes to reach their “ordained goal”. He believed in the expansion of southern slavery which is why he pushed for removing the Indians west of the Mississippi, which makes it the more disgraceful. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 said that it will allow American government to offer in-state territories to the Indian’s for their western land. This wasn’t the case when the U.S. went in and drove the Indians out by force.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson And The Trail Of Tears

    265 Words  | 2 Pages

    There is a saying in Africa, “Don’t make decisions about us, without us!” Andrew Jackson did not talk to the Indians before he made a bad decision which cost the lives of 4,000 Indians and dislocated 46,000 others. At the same time, the settlers weren’t happy with the Indian Removal Act process, it was too slow for them. “The policy was enacted with remarkable speed, but not fast enough to satisfy whites in the South and Southwest.” (p.331) Jackson's Democracy was always cast for the benefit of white men, it didn't even include white

    Read More

  • Genocide Vs Cambodian Genocide

    241 Words  | 1 Pages

    Throughout the time line of history nations, regions, and specific groups of people have witnessed persecution, oppression, and the destruction of their homeland. These series of events can be classified as a genocide which is the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation. Those who commit these acts have violated the Humanitarian Law in which they want to obliterate a culture because of their political views, economic views, social views, or religious views. Two genocides which have changed the history of a culture are the Armenian and Cambodian Genocides. Both genocides were carried out by the government however in some cases the ordinary people of the country joined in to punish

    Read More

  • The Genocide Convention: Why Did I Live?

    1301 Words  | 6 Pages

    Many people that have lived through a genocide may ask “Why did I live?” (Wiesel, 4). According to the Genocide Convention the term “Genocide” is” killing members of a group, causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group, deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part, imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group, forcibly transferring children of the group to another group” (Stanton, Para 3). The Genocide Convention is a document that contains 19 articles defining how a mass murders of members of a group is considered a Genocide. The Genocide Convention was placed into law in 1948 in response to the extreme number of murders committed during World War II (U.N, Treaty).

    Read More

  • The Holocaust And Rwandan Genocide

    217 Words  | 1 Pages

    In some of the genocides of the recent past, such as the Armenian massacres, the Holocaust, and the Rwandan genocide, a pattern of causes are shown prior to the act of ethnic annihilation. For example, the hardships and difficulties that infect the nation produces an overwhelming feeling of defeat. But many that experienced it had believed it to be just when accusing a minority to be unreasonably responsible for it. They target that specific population as it is easily done for their past had been tormented with the same discrimination. As this is seen consistently throughout the unfortunate multitude of genocides, it can be used as a means of preventing the murder of innocent lives.

    Read More

  • Genocide Vs Holocaust

    1586 Words  | 7 Pages

    Presentation The word genocide is hard to characterize; in this manner, an all inclusive meaning of genocide does not exist. There are numerous debates around what constitutes a genocide. Numerous sociologists, for example, Fein and Charny, and in addition others have figured their own meanings of the term, attempting to decide its typological indications and conditions. (Fein, 1990)

    Read More

  • Role Of Genocide: The Outcomes Of Colonialism And Imperialism In Africa

    313 Words  | 2 Pages

    The First genocide of the 20th century was one of many outcomes of colonialism and imperialism in Africa. The mass genocide occurred/begun in 1904, and ended in 1909 as a result of many uprisings and rebellions against the German powers, who later set up concentration camps to imprison the Herero peoples, and later on to imprison the Naama people, as they had caused an uprising after the initial capture and enslavement of the Herero people who had fallen under German power. During this time there were innumerable massacres committed by the Germans as a way to “Ethnically Cleanse” the area. These massacres took place in modern day Namibia, which was formally a German colony that had been colonized during the Scramble for Africa. In these camps, around 65,000 Herero people and 10,500 Nama were killed.

    Read More

More about Comparison Of Democracy And Genocide

Open Document