Comparison Of Hillary Clinton And Sarah Palin

The two major political party candidates from the election of 1988 is George Bush and Michael Dukakis.The political positions that the candidate George Bush held before seeking presidency was being a vice president for President Ronald Reagan and for Dukakis he was a governor for Massachusetts.The more liberal candidate was Dukakis because he was a democrat and the more conservative was Bush because he was a republican. Dukakis was more challenged by people in his own party during the primary election because the democrats thought that their party would need to win it all also they refused renomination.Since the Democrats had lost the 1984 presidential election, the Democrats in 1985 and 1986 were happy to find a new way to win the presidency.That 's why they made the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) to help out on Dukakis’s election.

There are many notable women in the world. The one that is most notable is Alice Paul. She was a woman who fought for women’s rights her entire life. She was a simple woman educated in sociology and law. Today her foundation continues the fight for girls and women around the globe.

A woman that encountered many obstacles through life, because of her gender dissimilarity was Sandra O’Connor. O’Conner was born in the city of El Paso, Texas in 1930 and her parents were Harry A. Day and Ada Mae Wilkey Day. In 1952, she got married to John Jay O’Connor III and had three sons: Scott, Brian, and Jay. O’Conner decided to become someone better in life even though that during the 1950s it was difficult to obtain an education. So, “in 1946, after competing against many other people and despite the probability that she might not be accepted because she was a woman, O’Connor was admitted to Stanford University.” The results of her desire to become someone better in the mid-twentieth drove her to achieve two degrees one in economics

In conclusion, Hillary Clinton’s speech became so well-known due to her high quality of deliverance. She used ethos pathos and logos to very strategically to make her message strong. Her message was clear and helped spread the word on women inequality. Clinton’s speech on women rights was successful and laid a foundation to give a voice to women who were forced to remain

One of which is Hillary Clinton, whose traits resemble Warren’s. They’re both smart, direct, courageous, knowledgeable, steadfast, and honest. Warren had an exceptional and rare education and Clinton went to Wellesley College and Yale Law School. They both were piqued by politics for Clinton was very active in student politics at Wellesley. They both had their own opinions and Clinton’s view is commonly agreed upon citizens. They both are extremely charismatic and they prove the pen is mightier than the

Ann Richards was a fiery, quick-witted woman. She was the forty-fifth governor of Texas and the second female governor of Texas, Richards is often regarded as the first female governor in her own right, as her predecessor, “Ma” Ferguson, had been elected as a surrogate in place of her husband (Ann Richards, 2014). Despite having only served one term, Richards became a nationally recognized figure for her outspoken feminism and plans to reform Texas.

The two senators I chose were Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer. My two congressmen were Rick Allen and Alma Adam

Victoria, who died nearly twenty years before Clinton was born, ran a path which no women before her dared to tread. What’s more amazing is that she did it more than 50 years before the 19th amendment was ratified in 1920, which gave women the right to vote. Victoria ran as part of the Equal Rights Party, which supported equal rights for women and women’s suffrage. Victoria, who shattered the glass ceiling for the many that would come after her, never cared for rules or regulations of a game she considered egregiously rigged against women. Her attitude towards the rules and regulations of society relates her to Equality

Successful in her mission to educate and spread awareness in Beijing and all across the world, Clinton’s speech led to “Beijing [legitimizing women’s rights] and [galvanizing] media attention to the issue” (Worden 35) which ultimately “energized the feminist movement and connected it more to the global human rights movement as well as the United Nations and governments” (Worden 36). In Clinton’s speech, she did not strive to make women feel sorry for themselves, but to show that women can overcome the hardships they face and the level of potential change has if women take initiative. Though progress has been made, the steps ahead add up to more than a mile. A survey taken from Penn. Schoen. and Berland Associates from November of 2008, states that the majority of people in the United States view the treatment of women at home as equal to men, whereas in the press, workplace, political settings, or the armed forces, treatment does not remain equivalent in treatment (Scherer 26). Progress has made steady yet gradual milestones towards the goal regarding women’s rights, but when it comes to the question of when dramatic change should take place, “the time is now”

Hillary Clinton is the First Lady and Senator; she shows credibility as an influential activist for women’s rights. She has been working “over the past 25 years” directly and relentlessly on “issues relating to women, children, and families” (Clinton). Also, Hillary Clinton was placed in circumstances where she was able to be more knowledgeable about the obstacles of “women in my (her) own country and around the world” (Clinton).

Presidential candidates should answer how they truly feel and what they know about a topic instead of dodging or attacking the question like an ex-girlfriend. We Americans put our faith in the president to keep the country flourishing, safe, and great. In this democratic debate, Hillary Clinton used the red herring fallacy and the ad hominem fallacy. In the end, everyone can see right through her answers. All that people have to do is pay attention to how she answered these questions and they would be able to understand they are

In her speech, “Women’s Rights are Human Rights,” First Lady Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton discusses the importance of fighting for women’s rights, as she argues they and human rights are one and the same. Clinton uses rhetoric, such as logic, empathy, and credibility, along with some propaganda to convince her audience of her point. The speech was given at the Fourth World Conference on Women on September 5, 1995 in order to convince people to stand up for women throughout the world and to respect their roles in society.

For a long time, women have been treated badly by the society that they live in. They have been killed because of dowry, they have been suffering from rape, and they haven’t been treated equal as men. Women were not allowed to take important decisions of their life, and they didn’t have a right to speak up for themselves. Therefore, Hillary Clinton was supporting women’s right in her speech, “Women’s right are Human rights” by talking about how women do not have equal rights as men, and how they have to go through tough situations. She also mentions that women’s rights should be equal to Human rights. This speech was given at the United Nations Fourth Conference of Women on September

Every four years, American media and its people pay close attention to every speech within the U.S. presidential campaign. Last year, Hilary Clinton from Democratic and Donald Trump from Republican were two final candidates running for the U.S. presidency. The former First Lady, Michelle Obama showed her support for the Democratic presidential candidate by giving an emotional speech on Clinton’s campaign rally. This speech occurred in New Hampshire. In this paper, I’ll provide some information of the speech, discuss the main issues she addressed, and analyze the profound message of her speech.

Given proper education and training, a woman can play a great part in the development of our country. At present, they are working side by side with men in offices, laboratories, factories and research projects. They are efficient teachers in schools, colleges and Universities, efficient pleaders in courts and efficient executives. It was a woman who was at the helm of affairs of our country before Nawaz Shareef and has proven herself a great orator and a great administrator. She had all the qualities of statesmanship in her.