They both envisioned a unified America with nonexistent social issues. But they differed on how they carried out with the hard task they took upon themselves. Johnson’s main concern when he took the presidential seat was that of ensuring the continuance of the Civil Rights legislation left behind by Kennedy; and so he did. In 1964 The Civil Rights Act was devised. The act put a halt to discrimination between the masses and minorities as a whole, and furthermore engaged into reenacting the ideas the original Act was meant to do. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission was created for the sole purpose of inspecting and putting a stop to discrimination in job environments. Furthermore the National Organization for Women was constituted for the intent of sustaining women’s equality in the American society. During Johnson’s tenure achievements towards the issue of unemployment were made. The unemployment rate fell to a mere percentage of 4 and there was an economic expansion of about 6%. In order to improve an average American’s life quality, LBJ provided various donations and many student loans, despite racial discrimination issues between student masses or the economic background they might have grown up with. The politics LBJ adopted during both his presidential reigns in regards to social issues somewhat benefited the American society but most of Johnson’s notion …show more content…
In regards to the line of action LBJ took in relation to foreign policies, there were many controversies amongst the masses. When LBJ first started his first term as the president of the United States, he took things slowly, and fought communism in Vietnam from afar .The Vietnam War led students create various movements to protest against being drafted in the war. Moreover, most of the American citizens were discontent with how tardy and sluggish the government changes were, and they were frustrated with the issues the Vietnam War brought. Due to the opposition’s strong persistence, LBJ decided to change his ploy. Negations with Hanoi took place in Paris, where it resulted in a partial halting of the bombings. When Nixon took the presidential seat, he decided to pursue the same line of action his predecessor had taken. He immediately declared that he would be the one to put a stop to the Vietnam War for good. But his proclamations were only made for the sole purpose of gaining political power and stardom. Another trait that they both shared in dealing with foreign policies was the habit of lying and hiding information from the masses. Both manipulated facts and lied about the truth to many people. Both Johnson and Nixon shut down from most people that surrounded …show more content…
Johnson believed in the utopia resembling notion of a unified America. We might even say that he was too much in love with America. Johnson’s ideals were great for his time. He had aces under his sleeves when it came to making reforms in the domestic front. But unfortunately he was not aware of every card that was in the deck. He knew too little about Vietnam, and consequently he did not know how to handle the issue wisely. LBJ was a broken record in the walls of American History. He left his presidential seat victorious on the home front and head down on the foreign front. Nixon on the other hand was the poor one who did good deeds but also the big bad wolf that was caught red handed. He is depicted as a tragic hero because when he lost he won and when he won he
This is contrasted by how Johnson believed in an active government that played a role in addressing societal issues, such as poverty and racial inequality. He implemented
Nixon was president for four years before Watergate occurred. The scandal did not happen until his second term in office. Before Watergate, Nixon received conflict for his decision to stay in Vietnam.[E: Relevant Facts] Many citizens believed it was not our business being there but Nixon still deemed it our duty to stay. Nixon never saw conflict in the service, which is highly ironic because he caused so much in the
Both Lincoln and Johnson had different ways to approach Reconstruction. Both did support the Ten Percent Plan. This plan allowed each southern state that were part of the rebellion to return to the Union. Just as long as 10% of their voters would take a loyalty oath and they approve the Thirteenth Amendment to abolish slavery. Johnson wasn’t as moral as Lincoln didn’t have the same political judgement.
Other than the few minor “cheap shots” made about Johnson, there was one statement that Blight makes that gives an indication of the black plight after the Civil War; “He was not only not anti-slavery, he was an open racist.” Johnson believed America should be a white man’s country forever, even though originally it was controlled by another
President Lyndon B. Johnson tragically stumbled into the presidency immediately following the assassination of John F Kennedy. In a time of nationally unrest and uncertainty, Johnson aspired to draw the country together. This would start with what he dubbed the “war on poverty”- the crux of his plan for establishing a Great Society. In what would eventually establish him in the memories of Americans as a champion of civil rights legislation, Johnson stepped in to fulfill the dreams of Kennedy’s New Frontier, expanding the original social goals. His efforts in attempting to achieve the Great Society brought about many changes to a pliable America.
He wanted equality for all and under no circumstances was there any other choice, which made the North happy. But after Lincoln was assassinated and Johnson became president, he offered much more leeway for the South which set Reconstruction back a large amount. Black and white southerners viewed the future of African Americans very differently. The majority of white southerners
It could not have been a worst time for such a weak diplomatic leader. Johnson’s temperament allowed the momentum of Kennedy’s plan with Kennedy’s holdover advisors and his personal hard nosed determination to fight Communism would only lead to the escalation of Vietnam (Hamby 1992, 267). And therefore the obscuring of this massive influx of new social programs that introduced a greater role for the government. Overshadowing the very controversial Vietnam War, the legacy of the Great Society is not just how a massive number of social legislative action changed the role of the government’s responsibility concerning poverty, medical care and educations. The Great Society was truly a legislative dream beyond any liberal’s imagination.
Nixon originally lost to John F. Kennedy, and following President Kennedy’s assassination and President Johnson’s decline in popularity from his decision to enter the Vietnam War, Nixon reentered the presidential ring. Nixon’s platform was as the alternative to the protestors and counter culture. He reinforced that he was the only candidate that stood for American values and patriotism. Nixon played on the American people’s fear and anger. He believed that he was the only candidate that could restore “law and order” to America.
Johnson entered the office of the presidency as the successor to John F. Kennedy. Following JFK’s tragic death, Johnson wished to enact policies that drew inspiration from the “New Frontier” (PBS 2014). This collection of initiatives and programs make up The Great Society. There was a major focus on Civil Rights and constant battles regarding that subject throughout Johnson’s term. Johnson pushed for reforms in education and an individual’s ability to afford it.
Even if Johnson freed the slaves, he did not do anything at all to help them. Johnson wasn 't in fact against slavery, he didn 't think it was a terrible way to treat people, he freed them just because he thought this would help the economy. He didn 't give them land where they could live and this forced the 'ex-slaves ' to work in farms, sometimes they where treated just as bad as before. The government levied a new poll tax they couldn 't afford and this meant they couldn 't vote anymore.
Nixon was a very complicated and complex man, who had a different personality depending on the environment present. The year 1968 was the year Richard Nixon would take his place in the White House for the next four years, and in his mind, hopefully years following. Although Nixon had a rough childhood at times, he was making himself known in the US. As the president of the United States of America, you pledge to do what is best for the country, but Nixon could not achieve this. Richard Nixon was an introverted man, one who was awkward in any social setting.
On July 02, 1964 , Lyndon Baines Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that prohibited against people discriminating against another because of their skin color , so everybody was treated equally. L.B.J he became president after John F. Kennedy was assassinated on November 22nd, 1963 and L.B.J took office the next day. He finished what J.F.K wanted and signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Political means some did it for votes or for something and principle means the person did something because it was the right thing to do. Why did L.B.J sign it was, it a political decision or was it a principle decision?
Why Did L.B.J Sign the Civil Rights Act of 1964? One July 2, 1964, pens were used to change the lives of every American citizen. L.B.J was born on a farm near Stonewall in the Hill Country of Central Texas and was really smart and had tons of energy; He decided to become a teacher. Why did L.B.J sign the civil rights act of 1964? If principle decisions are based on strongly-held beliefs, then Cotulla Teaching, Ignoring Southern Reaction, and Change of Heart show that President Johnson was motivated to sign by his principles.
He was apart of the democratic party. During his presidency, some of choices were a success and others were failures. He served many roles as the president but not all of them when well. When he served as commander in chief, he abused his power. After Lincoln was shot and killed, Johnson had to step up and lead.
In this paper, I will focus on the Civil Rights Act of 1964. I will provide the history, the important people involved in the establishment of the Civil Rights Act, the events that led to the act, and the reactions from the people, mostly Southerners, after the act was established. In the year of 1963, Blacks were experiencing high racial injustice and widespread violence was inflicted upon them. The outcry of the harsh treatments inflicted upon them caused Kennedy to propose the Civil Rights Act.