Comparison Of Urbanism And Architecture Of Frank Lloyd Wright

1474 Words6 Pages
In comparing the various theories regarding urbanism and architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright, the Situationists, and Maurice Culot & Leon Krier one cannot ignore the critical nature that their ideas were built upon. The differences that lie between these Architects and their ideas could not seem starker. Culot & Krier preferred an urban design that mirrors that of an ancient European village. Frank Lloyd Wright preferred developments of urban sprawl in his Broadacre City. The Situationists envisioned an endless city that focused on creating situations through which people could experience the city in a different manner. While these various theoretical interpretations enriched an understanding of architecture and urbanism in profound fashions, they were not exactly disparate. Rather, it is obvious that common threads of architectural and urbanist theory bridge the gap between these seemingly divergent expositions. Likewise, it is evident that these developments are critical responses to contemporaneous architects and urbanists. In understanding this connection, one is able to view these works as retaliations against norms rather than initiations from a void. Suburbia is quite frankly ingrained in the built environment of the United States. Frank Lloyd Wright was a formative architect in the American sphere, and he played a role in the formative processes of the suburbanization of the United States. Wright 's works are well known for being idealized architectural forms

More about Comparison Of Urbanism And Architecture Of Frank Lloyd Wright

Open Document