ipl-logo

Compassionate Ruler: Suetonius Vespasius

298 Words2 Pages

According to the article by Suetonius, Vespasian was a great compassionate ruler. Vespasian showed his compassion in two areas, the law and in his treatment of individual classes. Under his rule if any innocent person was to be punished, he would save them. Except for one account where he was given false information on the death of Helvidius in which he sent a messenger to stop the execution. He created a retirement fund for ex-consuls, this is not what it was necessarily called but it is what it seems to be. Vespasian was not ashamed of where his family came from, and in often times he would flaunt it around as if he were proud of his humble beginnings. When it comes to his military aspects, he did not appreciate it when his soldiers smelt like perfume. This tells me that he was a strict military leader and wanted his soldiers to work hard. Vespasian restored the temple of Peace that was destroyed by Nero and he also started an annual salary for teachers. This says that he cherished religion and education. One of his only flaws was money. He loved money and created burdens for the provinces. …show more content…

This being said, Vespasian could have been a terrible ruler but based on Suetonius’s point of view we see him as a great ruler. He did not comment much on the flaws of Vespasian but rather focused on the achievements and good things by him. Now, that is not to be said that Vespasian was not a great ruler with minimum flaws but, Suetonius is only giving one side of the story with a small toe in the water for the other

Show More
Related

  • Why Did King Edgar Make A Position Like A Sheriff In 970

    1318 Words  | 6 Pages

    He also had the power over the land, so he could watch the peasants and make sure they were having good production from the land, so he could make sure the king was receiving suitable payment from them.

    Read More

  • King Claudius Research Paper

    583 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ti. Claudius Nero Germanicus Claudius had many different things that he was achieving during his reign, he expanded the empire, had judicial and legislative affairs, did public works. He did a lot while he was in reign, he had invaded Britain and he had expanded Rome. He had a personal interest in laws so he wuld preside at public trials, and issued up to twenty edicts a day.

    Read More

  • King Nero Research Paper Outline

    1122 Words  | 5 Pages

    A. He is secondly most known for his countless murders even if there was no reason at all. His mother went to the extent of “insulting her own son and attempting to seduce him” for four years until he devised a plan to murder her in 59 AD (“Nero” 2-3). As Claudius’ natural son Britannicus should have been first up to become emperor, Nero saw him as a threat so he “was poisoned February 11, 55” as Nero claimed he was “having an epileptic seizure” (Scarre 51).

    Read More

  • Informative Essay: Was Andrew Carnegie A Hero?

    606 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to document 1, compare his houses that he was raised in cottage but died in castle. This evidence shows that he was very rich from nothing. According to his book “Wealth”(document 2) which is related to document 1, this document showed about his thought that he believed in the survival of the

    Read More

  • The Speeches Of Melancton Smith And Alexander Hamilton

    1102 Words  | 5 Pages

    He did not agree that the rich and the great were unfeeling and prone to excessive indulgence in drink. He imagined that, “those who are the most occupied by their own cares and distresses have the least sympathy with the distressed of others. The sympathy of the poor was generally selfish, that of the rich a more disinterested emotion (page 128).” He believed that all men from all classes had the same ambition when it came to having power in the

    Read More

  • Augustus Dbq

    461 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Learning from his predecessors mistakes, he did not make himself a dictator” (source 4). When 27 B.C.E hit he had called a transfer of the state to free disposal of the senate and the people. The first example just automatically makes him a powerful ruler because most people hated dictators that made very strict laws out of nowhere and made people do hard force later just like Quin Shi Huang Di who was a chinese emperor and had forced laborers work on the great wall (Great Wall of China). He was so powerful and had so much success he was called Augustus Thereafter. He was also voted for 55 years as ruler then had been voted for life!

    Read More

  • Is This Document, What Kind Of Leader Was Augustus?

    752 Words  | 4 Pages

    He really cared about his He brought peace to the sea, Gaul, Spain and Germany. He gave out grains and money to men when taxes fell short. I don’t think this document is reliable as I may have been biased as he is writing about himself. Anybody would say nice things about themselves. D: Soldier Augustus is a good leader; he brought peace and treated everyone equally.

    Read More

  • Andreas Vesalius Research Paper

    821 Words  | 4 Pages

    Just like the Renaissance men he likes to try out experiments by himself physically. Vesalius have multiple good character personalities such as striving for accuracy and likes to prove beliefs with physical evidence. These traits are all possessed by a Renaissance man. While Vesalius was a man who demonstrated the Renaissance spirit, he was also possibly a murderer.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Why Was Brutus Noble

    406 Words  | 2 Pages

    Was Brutus Noble? In Shakespeare 's’ The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar, one of the main characters, Marcus Brutus, is found dead by the noble Mark Antony, and is called “The Noblest Roman Of Them All” (Julius Caesar Act 5, scene 5, 68–72). Antony 's’ statement is a true one for many reasons. The first reason would be that Brutus was a man who valued his friendships over all else.

    Read More

  • What Caused The Fall Of Rome Dbq

    793 Words  | 4 Pages

    The great Empire of Rome, the greatest power to have ruled the Mediterranean. The Roman empire thrived in the time of Julius Caesar around 47 BC. Caesar had made Rome into an empire, but after he died, Rome started its downfall. It was unthinkable. The great Roman empire’s reign was over.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar And Lord Of The Flies Analysis

    850 Words  | 4 Pages

    Brutus tells the people of Rome, “...had you rather Caesar were living and die slaves,” (Shakespeare 45) and “not that i loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more,” (Shakespeare 45). He said this to let the people know that he loves Rome and he was following what he thought was right. He chose his duty over his friendship with Julius Caesar. Caesar was a true friend to Brutus because he says that he cried when he killed him saying, “Caesar loved me, I weep for him,” (Shakespeare 45). Brutus was also known as an honorable man.

    Read More

  • Why Is Claudius A Good Idiot

    1459 Words  | 6 Pages

    Suetonius was not all bad though, he used contemporary sources and was honest and accurate when reporting what was said by his sources. He also had personal experience in government and palace politics as well as understanding Roman religion well due to his life as a priest. There is also some evidence to support the ideas that he was neutral within his

    Read More

  • Frederick Douglass Letter To My Old Master Analysis

    601 Words  | 3 Pages

    However, he also believed that we weren't just born free and that we have to make ourselves into whom we are. Education and self-improvement were very important to him. The worst thing

    Read More

  • Mark Antony's Speech Analysis

    1793 Words  | 8 Pages

    NAME – AKUL KHANNA PROFESSOR – KANIKA DANG ENGLISH THESIS PAPER DATE -2ND NOVEMBER 2015 MARK ANTONY’S DEVELOPMENT IN JULIUS CEASAR In the year 44 BC the powerful empire of Rome had lost its ruler due to the assassination led by the senators and Julius Caesar’s brother Brutus. Caesar’s death was a huge setback for Rome and its people and the whole empire was in utter chaos. Mark Antony a very noble, loyal and affectionate friend of Caesar.

    Read More

  • Renaissance Humanism In 'The Praise Of Folly'

    1629 Words  | 7 Pages

    As Caesar loved me, I weep for him; // as he was fortunate, I rejoice at it; // as he was valiant, I honour him: // but, as he was ambitious, I slew him” (JC, 3.2.20-30), leaves the mob more disturbed and bitter than ever before they succumb to Antony’s appeal to emotion as he continues to exploit their self-love. Brutus’s naïve belief that he has successfully justified his actions in the eyes of the Romans with such a short speech lacking any self-love is a sign of his naivety – a form of foolishness that lacks folly. On the other hand, Antony’s long speech is brave and fearless – a sign of a fool who embodies folly. According to Folly, “I [folly] is also the champion of prudence” (Folly, 27) as prudence is derived from experience, and men who lack

    Read More

More about Compassionate Ruler: Suetonius Vespasius

Open Document