Competition policies in Namibia used to regulate businesses.
This assignment serves to highlight the main objectives of competition policy and to determine whether or not these policies are effective.
The goals of Namibia’s competition policy are established in terms of section 2 of the competition act (Goomab, 2003). The Namibian Competition Commission and the high court of Namibia ensure that these competition policies are followed. Amunkete (2011) she defines competition policy as laws that are set to regulate anti-competitive practices and in the same breath promote competition in markets. The anti-competition practices results in inefficient allocation of resources and negative economic growth. A very good example of anti-competitive
…show more content…
The Namibian Competition Commission introduces rules or regulations to govern the different markets and this are also known as competition policy. In addition, it ensures that small firms have an equitable opportunity to participate in the Namibian economy (Amunkete, 2011). According to the findings by Namibia statistics Agency (2016) its data revealed that consumer price index (CPI) increased from 3.3 to 3.7. This is a clear indication that there is fair competition among firms and that the competition policy has achieved one of its objectives in Namibia. However, the success of this competition policy comes at the expense of decreasing business profits and this result into disagreements in goals between the two parties. For instance, many firms will want to merge in order to dominate that particular market and earn abnormal profits. But Namibia’s competition policy strictly controls these merger proposals and only permits few mergers that will not disturb the flow of competition in the markets and that will also help in the accomplishment of its objectives. This will result into a decrease in firms that desire to own most of the market shares and abuse their
For instance, John D. Rockefeller pursued numerous of strategies, to try to eliminate his competitors. From horizontal integration, in which he tried to buy or force his competitors out, to vertical integration, which Andrew Carnegie also practiced, meaning they eventually owned everything they needed to produce. J. Pierpont Morgan had a different strategy in an attempt to monopolize his company, he would help merge competing corporations by purchasing massive amounts of stocks and selling them at a profit. These strategies helped capitalize the entrepreneurs control in the growing
The only competition that they have is they international competition such as trade with other countries; in the US we have a free market with unlimited
At the beginning of the Progressive Era there were many issues involving the unregulated businesses. Most of the problems involved safety issues that severely injured many workers, but it also involved business created monopolies to maximize their profits which affected the consumers because there was not a competitive price. This is why the American Government should be able to put regulations and laws in place to restrict businesses from unfair treatment of their workers health and safety; also, to limit the possibility of monopolies occurring to protect the consumers of the products. Many businesses now follow these laws and regulations put in place by our government which makes the story of how America was built one of progress not regresion.
Even further, these robber barons would often ruthlessly eradicate competition by buying out other companies to establish monopolies through the horizontal and vertical integration of production and product.
During the Progressive Era there were multiple of changes occurring that people became overwhelmed. New resources in the oil market, industrialization, fights for equality. There were many factory jobs, however, no one to stand up for the workers. So of course people will turn to their government for help, the power house of the country. However, even the government was picky in what they helped with.
Competition keeps companies striving for the highest quality products for the lowest price because they want to attract customers. However, if people had no choice where to buy their car, it would not matter what a company sold. Additionally, if there was no competition, there would be no way to benchmark your products for quality or technological advancements. Still using the car company example, the car industry would be like it is in Cuba where everyone drives cars from the 70’s, because that is all they
This also causes involving price-fixing and market-division arrangements. It usually involves the private parties and the government which would also be the Department of Justice or the Federal Trade Commission. This is a firm has done something anti-competitive in order to stay ahead in the game or stay ahead in the monopoly. Monopolies without any anti-competitive behavior aren’t usually illegal. An example of these cases was in 1911 and the Supreme Court ruled abuse on John Rocketfeller's Standard Oil Co. because they had abused its monopoly power to keep other companies from going against it and it also divided into thirty-four separate companies.
The societies of West Africa, Europe, and North America exhibited similarities and differences in their religious beliefs, values, and government systems. These contrasts and similarities were further made apparent during European expansion across the Atlantic and the subsequent new cross cultural interactions that were created. One way in which the societies of West Africa, Europe, and North America diverged was in their belief systems. Unlike Europe and North America, West Africa gradually adopted Islam in addition to its traditional religions. Islam diffused through the trans-Saharan trade with North Africa and by the 1200’s was assimilated into the Mali and Songhai Empire.
In spite of that, barriers to entry in an oligopoly market are high. The prime barriers are economies of scale, access to costly and sophisticated technology, patents and tactical measures by existing dominating firms devised to hinder new firms from entering the market. In addition, other sources of barriers include government regulation favoring incumbent firms making it difficult for nascent firms to
Thirdly and finally, it will give some examples of this phenomena. The formation of a cartel causes a lot of problems on the market. Cartels are based on agreements between different companies. The companies work together, in order to gain more profit for themselves.
Now, like any other company out there in the corporate world, they all come across a point in business where they face a competitive situation, due to either their product line, pricing, or their financial system. According to our
The rivalry among existing competitors The extent of rivalry between ports is the first force shaping
The oligopoly market is set up in a way so that competitors can survive because each is unique and there are so few competitors that they are virtually indispensable even if some ethics atrocity
Executive Summary This report complies of an extensive study of Nando’s South Africa. A brief background of Nando’s is provided. A SWOT analysis is used to scan the micro environment of Nando’s to identify the businesses strengths, which should be exploited to gain a competitive advantage, weaknesses, where strategies need to be implemented so not to lose customers , opportunities, where strategies to exploit these ideas to gain a competitive advantage need to be identified and implemented and threats, where strategies need to be implemented so the business is not negatively affected. The Porters Six Forces model is used to scan the challenges Nando’s faces in the market environment by looking at level of rivalry in the market, the threat
Many organisation argue that they should move away from the ideology of HSE legislation standards because of it’s many regulation(red-tape) affect the way business is done The Rt Hon Michael Fallon et al., 2013). The reason organisation believes in a more “laissez faire” way of doing things, it that is help drives the market into a more competitive form of business in comparison to the “laissez faire” of trade Kelloway and Cooper,