ipl-logo

Compromise Of 1850 Dbq Essay

1309 Words6 Pages

Before the passing of the Compromise of 1850, Congress needed to keep the power balanced between slave states and non-slave states in the government. To keep the balance, they passed the Missouri Compromise in 1820. This Compromise allowed Missouri into the union as a slave state and allowed Maine into the union as a non-slave state. As a result, the balance between slave states and non-slave states stayed equal. This resulted in neither the North nor the South having an advantage in passing laws. This Compromise was good for the time being but as time went on, the argument between the North and South about their differing political views on slavery grew, which overall led to the Civil War. Although some may argue that the Civil War was caused …show more content…

This election and the new political rules that came with the Compromise of 1850 led to the Civil War. Newly elected President Lincoln was highly against slavery. He refused to have any exceptions to slavery. He. He wanted it abolished in the entire United States. In addition, he refused to allow slavery in the new territories that the United States had bought (Doc 7). This caused a lot of anger in the South because their economy relied heavily on slavery, and if Lincoln abolished it, the South's economy would be in shambles. This continuing debate on slavery and Lincoln's refusal to budge on abolishing slavery was a major political issue and, as a result, the idea of a civil war formed. As a result, of Lincoln being elected President, the South tried to convince Lincoln and the North that slavery wasn’t as bad as it seems. The South created these pictures and stories to convince the North that slavery wasn’t bad and so they could keep slavery in the South. Harriet Beecher Stowe strongly disproved the lies the South had through the novel “Uncle Tom’s Cabin”. Stowe explained throughout her book the true struggles of a slave and how slaves were treated in the South. Stowe's book was directed toward the North to inform them that the South's political …show more content…

First of which was allowing popular sovereignty. Meaning each new state was allowed to vote to be a slave state or not. Popular sovereignty caused many people to flood the new territories to sway the state to either be a slave state or a free state. The people of the North and South wanted their ideas and way of life to continue throughout the new land, so they all fought for places in these new states. As a result, they would hope that the voting would go their way and that their ideas would have a stronger place in government. The “battle” for creating states with or against slavery got so intense that people ended up voting in states where they didn’t live to have their ideas be politically stronger. I saw this when Kansas tried to hold a vote to decide if it was going to be a free state or not and most of the votes that were made were made by citizens of Missouri (Doc 3). This obsession with political power separated the North and South further and increased the chances of a Civil War. The next rule that came from the Compromise of 1850, which also led to the Civil War, was that slaves who made it to the free North still could be arrested. I explained this through the court case of Dred Scott v. Sandford in 1857. The Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger Taney stated slaves didn’t have the right to sue nor the right to be considered citizens in the North. He also

Show More
Related

  • Missouri Compromise That Led To The Civil War

    824 Words  | 4 Pages

    Prior to the Civil War, multiple compromises were made to try to keep civility. The problems that led to the Civil War and increased sectionalism were the Missouri Compromise, The Kansas-Nebraska Act, The Compromise of 1850, and The Caning of Senator Sumner. These compromises and acts had problems with them because they had too many flaws. Before the Missouri Compromise was written in 1820, complications began to rise between the North and South.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Civil War And Lincoln Leading The Union

    1079 Words  | 5 Pages

    Lincoln made sure to keep new states from becoming slave states, yet he didn’t make it illegal for states that already had slaves. This brought tension because this made it harder for the south to gain western political allies. This caused the slave states to secede and become the United Confederate States. They adopted Jefferson Davis as their president.

    Read More

  • Sectionalism Contribute To The Admission Of States Essay

    1185 Words  | 5 Pages

    However, at that time, there was a perfect balance between free and slave states in Congress. Admitting Missouri would essentially hand all the power to the south. In order to settle both parties’ desires the Missouri Compromise was drawn. It admitted Missouri as a slave state, and simultaneously admitted Maine as a free state to preserve the balance in Congress.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Conflict Between 1820 And 1860

    496 Words  | 2 Pages

    Compromise, a resolution of a conflict that is achieved only if both sides come to a mutual conscientious, was used to terminate political conflicts. The North and South relied heavily on this aspect since they had two distinct perspectives regarding slavery. However, compromise did not have the great effect as it was visioned because it furthered tension between the North and South by rewarding the South fully with slavery. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 initially was seen as just because there was a 36°30 N line established to balance the amount of free and slave states.

    Read More

  • Conflict Between 1820 And 1860 Dbq Essay

    924 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the time period between 1820 and 1860, slavery was an ongoing issue in America. To resolve this issue people turned to compromises and documents. Overtime the south began to lose respect for the North leading to a need for separation. The North begin to wage a war on slavery, in the process is regarding their constitutional duties. The conflicts residing between the North and South along with the government's inability to control the issues made compromise impossible.

    Read More

  • Was The Compromise Of 1850 Justified To Delay The Civil War

    1168 Words  | 5 Pages

    The reason the compromises and the act managed to delay the civil war was because slavery was still legal. The reason the civil war occurred was because issues such as Slavery, sectionalism, and the argument of State's rights vs. Federal rights were treated as compromises rather than issues. The southern states were content that the Missouri compromise was enacted because it allowed them to strength and practice the fugitive slave act. The northern states were content when the Nebraska Kansas act was enacted because it gave states to decide how they wanted to enter the union. It may seem that these compromises and act were ineffective and lack complexity, but for a decade it managed to keep the union together.

    Read More

  • Missouri Compromise Of 1850 Essay

    941 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise of 1820 sparked debate in regards to the expansion of slavery into the western territories. Missouri requested statehood but wanted to come in as a slave state. Having Missouri come in, as a slave state would disrupt the equal balance between free and slave states. In an effort to regulate slavery in the western states, Jesse Thomas suggested that an amendment to be implemented into the Missouri Compromise that would ban slavery north of latitude 36°30’ in the Louisiana Purchase. This would include the Southern border of Missouri and the area west of Mississippi.

    Read More

  • What Led Up To The Compromise Of 1850

    573 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1857, the Supreme Court decision denied African Americans any citizenship rights. This meant that even the freed slaves would not receive any citizen rights. The Court declared that slavers were property and this completely sealed any possibility of the free-states’ return since the Missouri Compromise. Finally, in 1860, Abraham Lincoln stepped up and began the process to resolution. Lincoln opposed the expansion of slavery into the territories.

    Read More

  • Reasons For The Compromises Of 1860

    688 Words  | 3 Pages

    The main reason behind the long time of conflict between the Northern and Southern states of the United States, were the constant compromises. These compromises work good enough at doing their job of making both sides happy, but by 1860 compromise no long seemed possible. The whole idea of making compromises was drawn out, and due to multiple events in the country, it eventually came back for the worst. Some of the events which lead to the downfall of compromises were, the Missouri Compromise, the many anti slavery movements, and the election of 1860.

    Read More

  • The Compromise Of 1850: Key Cause Of The Civil War

    650 Words  | 3 Pages

    Lastly, a fugitive slave law was passed. The compromise of 1850 played a key role leading up to the Civil War because it only made matters worse between the north and south, because neither of them were fully appeased. The compromise only delayed the conflict. A significant part of the compromise of 1850, was the fugitive slave act.

    Read More

  • Missouri Compromise 1860 Analysis

    1173 Words  | 5 Pages

    The north got Maine while the south got Missouri (Norton 224). However, this compromise did not address the issue of slavery expansion permanently, and it was only a temporary solution to ease political tensions. The document failed to outline how future states would be administered, which threatened to cause an imbalance between the slave and free states. The Missouri Compromise fails to address how the Union will be maintained. These issues were not addressed by the document since the southern representatives wanted to continue holding slaves.

    Read More

  • Political Dispute Around 1820-1860 Essay

    61 Words  | 1 Pages

    The cause of most political dispute around 1820-1860 was mostly about slavery. There has been division between the North and the South, though compromise had usually serve in calming the disagreement. However, nearing 1860, political compromise appeared useless. Comprises simply postponed addressing the issue, and led to even more greater issues than needed,compromise wasn’t working politically, socially,and economically for our nation.

    Read More

  • What Was Lincoln's Role In The Civil War

    1461 Words  | 6 Pages

    In the election, Lincoln did not win a single southern state vote, because of his reputation as being moderate on the slavery question. Although Lincoln initially arranged to abolish slavery in the south, he decided that he would control it in the south and refrain from allowing it to spread throughout the western territories. Lincoln contemplated war if slavery distributed into the western territories from the southern states. Since slavery already existed in the south, he did not have the motive to withdraw it because of the success it brought to the economy. With his

    Read More

  • Major Transformations In American History

    1010 Words  | 5 Pages

    A huge concern for the smaller states was of the representation and power of voice due to their size and the potential lack of representation would place dramatic and damaging affects to their future. Additionally, large parts of the population in the southern states during this time were made up of slaves while the northern states had a large population of free white men. During this time, slaves as well as women were not allowed to vote and did not have a voice when it came to making decisions about the government’s current and future stated. A major concern that placed huge risks with some of the slavery states was the fear that the northern states would take over and make their voice silent.

    Read More

  • Cause And Effects Of The American Civil War

    936 Words  | 4 Pages

    They believed that the federal government had no right to interfere with their ability to own and control slaves, and saw any attempt to abolish slavery as a violation of their constitutional rights. Many southern leaders argued that the states had the right to secede from the Union if they felt that their rights were being infringed upon. The election of Abraham Lincoln as president in 1861 had a significant effect on the South’s perspective leading up to the Civil War. Lincoln was a vocal opponent of the expansion of slavery, and his election was seen as a threat to the economic and social systems of the Southern states, which relied heavily on the labor of enslaved African Americans. This led to a growing sense of desperation and fear among the Southern elite, who feared that Lincoln’s presidency would lead to the abolition of slavery and the destruction of their way of life.

    Read More

More about Compromise Of 1850 Dbq Essay

Open Document