The word “conflict” comes from the Latin “confligere”, the literal translation of which is “to bend together” or to “to tense”1. Conflicts are unavoidable and usually an interpersonal relations but it is necessary to know how to resolve it either in our day to day activities, business, state, country or nation state. Conflict is a contest, competition, dispute and tensions as well as manifest clashes between social forces. It’s the situation in which incompatible goals, attitudes, emotions, behaviours or resources lead to a disagreement or conflict between two or more individuals or nations. It often differs from person to person, group to group, cultural background to cultural background or between and among nations. Conflicts are also tensions …show more content…
Also, developments embedded in the internal structures of one or more clashing countries often leads to conflict while a change in this structure might lead to the end of this conflicts or their recurrence. Territorial claims, ideology, colonialism, nationalism, religion and natural resources have been the main sources of conflict throughout the world while the causes of some of these is decreasing. Struggles for the control of valuable natural resources have remained a persistent feature of national and international affairs for decades. In addition to helping some of the most corrupt and oppressive regimes to remain in power, natural resources have been fuelling conflicts within and between African countries3. Such conflict situations typically take the form of territorial disputes over the possession of oil-laden border areas, factional struggles among the leaders of oil-rich countries, and major inter-state wars over the control of vital oil and mineral …show more content…
It must be noted that Africa was largely controlled by indigenous people in the 1870s, but by 1914 it became almost wholly subdued and divided into colonies by the European powers, colonial boundaries in these formations were not established according to the various indigenous groupings. The grouping of nations together in some cases and dividing them in others was a common feature as long as it was consistent with the security and economic interests of the colonial powers. After independence, most Africa became and is still disturbed by the legacy of trying to get originally different indigenous groupings to live peacefully in a single country or to get the same ethnic group to live peacefully in different neighbouring countries. As in most of Africa, therefore, the origins of the conflict situation between Cameroon and Nigeria over border issues can be traced to the colonial era and some post-independence political activities. The dispute over Bakassi is a legacy of imperialist colonial rule and neo-colonial regimes in Africa, for selfish economic, political and strategic calculations, by imperialist capitalist powers such as Britain, Germany, France, Belgium, Portugal, Spain, etc. The whole boundary dispute began when the Obong of Calabar signed a "Treaty of Protection" with Britain on September 10, 1884; Britain then agreed to extend its protection to the Obong and his Chiefs. The
In the planet, there are different kinds of people who have been co-existing together over the years. The settlement of people in the world is such that different people who come from one tribe tend to settle in a given region where they live together peacefully and carry on with their daily day-to-day activities to improve their livelihoods. However, people from different parts of the world develop some differences between them that result in conflicts among them in some instances. Conflicts can be at different levels such as community conflicts, national conflicts regional conflicts or even global conflicts. The effects of conflicts among people are usually felt by each and every person in the community, and they are usually
The second reason/cause is “Imperialism” - when a country increases their power and wealth by bringing additional territories under their control. Before World War 1, Africa and parts of Asia were points of contention amongst the European countries. This was especially true because of the raw materials these areas could provide.
Based on the documents provided, it can be argued that the Europeans were unwelcome and sparked a great disturbance among the African people during new imperialism period all across Africa based on the following perspectives from documents 4 and 9 which demonstrate brutal violence towards Africans, documents 6 and 7 which call for help to remove the presence of the Europeans, and documents 2 and 3 represent how these Africans state wish to avoid being under European power. Throughout the history of European colonization, there is evidence that the Europeans have disrupted and separated majority of the African continent. Based on the documents provided, each document individually states their own problems with the European occupying African
Conflict can be defined as a struggle or clash between opposing force and is important to human life experience. There are a multitude of factors which can stimulus conflict between individuals, group, man and the environment or within one's self. There are many conflicts in the book "Sweetgum Slough" written by Claire Karssiens. The three conflicts that stood up to me are Louis vs. Schmeling, Karssiens vs. new school, and Karssiens brother vs. Panther.
In the 19th century the British became the ruling power beside the River Gambia however the French progressed domestic along the River Senegal. In 1884 to 1885 the European powers separated up Africa. France was established as the colonial power in Senegal.
Conflict has been around since the beginning of time: Satan tempting Adam and Eve, the Pharaoh and his enslavement of the Israelites, events such as World Wars 1 and 2, et cetera. Creating a conflict is the easy part. Realizing there is a conflict and finding a way to compromise is often the hard part. Unfair working conditions and inequality at Kohler factories in Wisconsin led to the conflict of the 1934 Kohler Strike. This resulted in the compromise of better working conditions.
Human beings are all individually incredibly unique. This uniqueness is apparent in every experience of a person’s life, but it is the cycle of these unique experiences that connects all human beings. This cycle is defined as the human condition. Furthermore, this cycle is a series of inevitable life aspects that makes up a human being; two of the most obvious being growth and conflict. Within the human condition, growth cannot exist without conflict and conflict cannot exist without growth.
Although African reaction to the presence of external actors could, in some cases, be appropriately described as defiant, resistance did not exclusively define African attitudes toward the outside. The capacity and willingness to collaborate with European influences lends credence to the re-interpretation of Africa as an entity with agency, just as European states have typically been understood. African political units were just like other political entities throughout history in that they employed strategies according to their domestic and foreign policy interests. Following elementary diplomatic logic, African political units would collaborate with European powers where it was conducive to their interests and goals.
Conflict Theory American society today is made up of all three of the theories. In my opinion, these theories all thrive off each other as a whole. I feel that the chain is something like this, Symbolic Interactionism, as well as Functionalism, lead into Conflict Theory. However, I feel that Conflict Theory is by far the largest component American society is made from, here is why! First I would like to touch on Symbolic Interactionism, symbols we attach value or meaning.
Conflict arises from many things. It can be little things like arguments to something serious conflicts like wars and anarchy. It spans the human world both inside and outside. Most conflict is done internally, between the mind and the consciousness.
Throughout the ages, many nations have been known to do whatever it takes to sustain a valuable supply of resources. For this reason, however the exploitation of resources by countries using unfair means is an enduring issue for many groups of people. Exploitation of resources is when the government or outside forces take advantage of a nation’s resources. This issue is significant because it causes civil conflict and war, can impact people of nations terribly, and can destroy industry. Problems created by exploitation of resources can be seen in examples from Sierra Leone, the Congo and British India.
It normally occurs due to how each individual is different from one another and fail to share the same goals, mission and views. Each and every individual has different personalities which always results to them having choices and opinions that are hardly compatible. Interpersonal conflict can be generally grouped into 3 categories; policy conflicts, value conflicts and ego conflicts. POLICY CONFLICTS Policy conflicts are disagreements on how a situation should be dealt with that will eventually affect both individuals. Policy conflicts normally always have a winner and a loser.
The notion and the meaning of conflict have evolved with time. Before Coser, conflict was seen more as a source of social change and disintegration. However, the conflict theory we are referring to here is not necessarily an infliction of violence or atrocities, but a conflict that arises due to unequal distribution of power and resources. Theorists consider power to be an important element of conflict theory. For instance, who uses power or where is power located are two of the main concerns of conflict theory.
“Conflict is a struggle over values and claims to scarce status, power, and resources, in which the aims of the opponents are to neutralize, injure, or eliminate the rivals”. (L. Coser,
30 years of trouble “The Troubles” was a 30 year long lasting conflict, between the unionistic protestants and the Irish nationalistic population groups. Radical representatives of the Unionism were called loyalists and radical nationalists were called republics. The conflict originated from previous conflicts and the segregation of two major population groups, based on ethnicity and confession throughout history. The terms “catholic” and “protestant” serve as distinguishing features between two social groups in Northern-Ireland, which feature opposing social, political, economic and religious minds. These cultures were build out of the contrast of the old-fashioned Irish, who were poor, rural and catholic and the protestant colonizing Scottish