Religious Conflicts: A Matter of Public Concern On September 12, 2016, I sat in French class, trying to form coherent sentences in a language I was unfamiliar with to complete an essay assigned to us. All of a sudden, our teacher faced the class and announced that the Principal had instructed us to quickly make our way home. “Call your parents and ask them to pick you up. The public buses might be unsafe. Riots have broken out in Bangalore”, she said in a surprisingly calm voice. My heart stopped. Please don’t be another religious riot. Growing up in India, I have learnt to equate any bizarre incident or tragedy to the ongoing religious conflict. Not because it is a real problem affecting ordinary citizens in their day-to-day lives but because …show more content…
Be it the Protestant-Catholic wars, the Crusades, the Kashmir issue, the Israel-Palestine conflict or the Rohingya crisis in Myanmar, religion, an institution that serves the purpose of bringing order to society, has surprisingly been a major factor in these historical as well as current conflicts. It plays a significant role in world politics. Hence, addressing and resolving religious conflicts is a matter of utmost importance because it not only hinder the lives of ordinary people but also, pose a threat to a nation’s democracy, sovereignty, and integrity. It can cause instability in a country and loss of communication between individuals and firms, which in turn can result in the stalling of technological innovations and ideas. Thus, hampering economic …show more content…
The educated and aware citizens must disavowal the extremists, speak of the empowerment of minorities and condemn any violent acts against a religious group. It is shown that states that place strong restrictions on freedom of religions and hence, freedom of expression face higher levels religious intolerance that results in conflicts. In 2012, the Human Rights Council resolution 16/18 was implemented. It provides the international framework for combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of, and discrimination, incitement to violence, and violence against persons based on religion or belief. It also comprises the establishment of government structures to address religious tension and promote dialogue; and encourages increased willingness, on the part of political and religious leaders, to speak out against religious intolerance. The effectiveness of this resolution is still being determined. The Universal Rights Group reports that now more than ever, there is a need for a collective and united international policy framework and response regarding religious intolerance as the cases have unexpectedly increased since 2012. Nonetheless, it was a step in the right direction and states are being encouraged to actively adopt the measures prescribed by resolution
For the readings of the week we read Chapters 11 and 12 of Religion and the American Constitutional Experiment by John Witte, Jr and Joel A. Nichols. Within these chapters Witte and Nichols discuss court cases in which the Supreme Court has made decisions with regards to religion in the public life and religious organizations and the law. When it comes to portraying religion in the public life, it is very difficult to accommodate everyone’s religion into it since there is a variety of different religions in the United States. Accommodating one religion into the public life would mean attempting to accommodate all of religions. The most the government can do is accommodate the religion they know best.
Conflict can change interaction between people, escalate, and lead towards violence when people within a community express intolerance and restrict others. Some leaders of a community confine others who are different from them, conveying their intolerance; this usually creates more conflict and perpetuates negative opinions. The article “In the City of Brotherly Love” is a clear example of this. After a wave of Irish Catholic immigrants began arriving in the U.S. in the 1820s given the impression that it was a land of opportunity, they unexpectedly received a bitter welcome from the Anglo-Saxon Protestant community. Since they are looked down upon and given no control regarding their rights (including education, religion, and employment),
Patel wants everyone to embrace the many different religions that we have while believing that they all can coexist in the community “I realized that it was precisely because of America’s glaring imperfections that I should seek to participate in its progress, carve a place in its promise, and play a role in its possibility. And at its heart and at its best, America was about pluralism” (Patel 89). Patel says that pluralism should be embraced and individuals should have a better understanding of one’s religion before mistaking. These mistakes can lead to disputes and ultimately to pandemonium characterized in this text.
For this reason, an increasing amount of conflict arises and shapes a person’s prejudice. Religion constructs its follower’s ideology which puts
One of the main reasons why America was established is the pursuit of religious freedom, as every American citizen is given the freedom to practice any or no religion and the right to freedom of speech and expression. Although the pursuit of religious freedom is still true today, discrimination continues in American society. After terrorist attacks on September 11th, 2001, discrimination against Muslims religion have increased, which illustrates an incompatibility of multiple cultures and religions in the United
If the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation can push aside the clearly specified guaranteed rights and freedoms of their citizens, the possibility of the same unjust restrictions being taken against other religions in that country is quite likely, furthermore, the possibility of similar exploitation happening in this country is not as farfetched an idea as some may scoff. The claim states that Jehovah’s Witnesses are dangerous extremists equal to Al-Qaida, ISIS, and the Taliban. The United Nations, the Helsinki Commission, the European Court of Human Rights and numerous other international organizations have spoken out against the court’s decision to misapply laws and label Jehovah’s Witnesses in such a manner, yet their appeals seem to have fallen on deaf ears (Hope,
4. Some have argued that politics and religion should be kept apart. Do you think so? If no, how might they be related and how will they interact? I think religion and politics shouldn’t be apart because religion sometimes makes identity, culture, and law for the country.
As an individual in a society with conflict everywhere, differing between personal and religious beliefs can often be burdensome. Making sure the best option is chosen is very important for Antonio in this novel due to his family being torn on what he should become. Many people with strong religious beliefs can also claim that they have been torn between choosing what is right for one. Making that decision can be hard for an individual from a strong religion, I do relate to being torn between choosing which is best for me.
Everyone has the right to practice, or not practice, the religion of their choice, but conversely, no one has the right to violate another’s civil liberties or rights in service of their choice of
In the essay, “ The Role of Religion in Modern Society”, Dalai Lama, The preeminent religious authority in Buddhism reveals the reason behind why religion has been a major source of conflict throughout the history, and how inter-religious harmony is the key to overcoming conflict of the first sort. He goes deeper into the similarities between different religion and identifies the obstacles that obstruct inter-religious harmony by developing ways to overcome them. He believes religion plays a vital role in the modern society by shaping the person's spiritual qualities rather than making him a better religious person than the other. Dalai Lama expounds that religious practice can help a person cope with adversity than those who don't.
Over the past few years, anyone can tell you that religious importance in our country has become less, and less vital. Recent events like the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City, New York, and the attacks on Paris, France, have made the freedom of religion harder and harder to come by. Having the free practice of religion has proved difficult. Christianity has suffered from these issues as the general acceptance of the religion has declined substantially in the few decades. A recent poll there was a sense of discrimination for the Islamic religion, as they have been responsible for the attacks, 8/10 Americans believe Christianity should be practiced freely, while only a mere 6/10 Americans think the Muslims should practice freely (Source #3).
The author gives a view on the religions in the global context. 5. Topic Sentence: The contemporary world today combines a wide diversity of world religions and in order to preserve peace people ought to display high level of mutual tolerance.
In the United States, enmity towards Roman Catholics, Jews, Mormons, and other groups has been prevalent, intense, and long term. Over 40,000 complaints of religious discrimination have been filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission since Title VII of the
War on Religion There is a belief among people that declares religion as the main cause of wars worldwide, and it has been the main cause of violence throughout the history of humanity. While we cannot deny that, some battles such as the crusades and the Lebanese civil war were based on religious faith, it is totally illogical to consider religion as the main cause of wars. Moreover, although there is also no disagreement that some extremist in Islam were behind 9/11, it is considered a misjudgment to say that all individuals in this religion convey the concept of violence and cruelty. The fact is non-religious incentives take the responsibility for almost all of humans’ wars. Lives lost during religious wars are nothing compared to those lost during non-religious wars.so why people believe that religion is the cause of wars, why they are wrong and do the extremist represent religions?
He wants to demonstrate that the contemporary privileging of the secular state is problematic by pointing out the dangers of an inclusivist approach as well as the vapidity of multiculturalism with its empty desire to respect differences whilst not living them out to the full. Serious understanding of inter-religious encounters is vital to make an intercultural dialogue proper. It is necessary for us to combine the linguistic form with the specific context of the utterance in order to determine the full meaning of an utterance. Wolf finally talks about the approaches that nation states should take in dealing with religions.