All stories have important conflicts, but not all stories have three essential conflicts. In “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, Sanger Rainsford faces many conflicts. Such as Man vs. Man. This is necessary to the plot of the story. Man vs. Nature, another substantial plot line which Rainsford must face. Another vital conflict is Man vs. Himself. This conflict is crucial because Rainsford is alone and trapped on an island, facing the horrid general alone. Against the world, and against himself. Rainsford must find his way on Ship Trap island therefore he must face these challenges alone.
In “The Most Dangerous Game”, there are numerous models of a man vs. another man. One case is Rainsford against General Zaroff. In the short story, General Zaroff is hunting Rainsford down on Ship Trap island. While Zaroff finds this to be intriguing, Rainsford is alarmingly afraid at the thought of it. “‘You will find this game worth playing,’ the general said enthusiastically. ‘Your brain against mine. Your woodcraft against mine. Your strength and stamina against mine. Outdoor chess! And the stake is not without value, eh?’” (10). One may think this is a splendid idea, whereas countless others view this concept as gruesome. Zaroff decides if Rainsford does not wish to accompany him on his hunting trip, Rainsford will be on the
…show more content…
A man, such as Rainsford, is challenging the natural world. In the narrative, Rainsford challenges the sea. “All he knew was that he was safe from his enemy, the sea, and that utter weariness was on him”(3). Rainsford is escaping the sea, and entering Ship Trap island. The sea fights Rainsford vigorously, barely letting Rainsford escape from its grasp. Rainsford feels calm to hear the sound of waves crashing on a rocky shore, knowing that he will soon be able to escape the treacherous sea. The raw world is out to get Rainsford, and he can feel it
Digging himself in France, Rainsford survives when “seconds delay means death” (13). Living through a life and death situation one must unleash his hidden ability. In Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” Rainsford uses his knowledge and sense to persevere through the worst of times. Conquering fear and pain he survives. The author produces a theme of perseverance and survival between Sanger Rainsford and General Zaroff.
Richard Connell, a now deceased author, has written many books, one of them being the short story “The Sin of Monsieur Pettipon.” Even though many books have had the honor of being written by the hand of Richard Connell, the one most referenced with his name is “The Most Dangerous Game.” Sanger Rainsford is the protagonist of the story that goes up against a psychotic General Zaroff, who kills men for pleasure and sport. Sanger Rainsford has a very particular set of survival skills that helped him persevere through the traumatizing life predicament. First of all, he was notoriously strategic.
“I live for danger” General Zaroff says to Rainsford. When Zaroff says this, it sparks the main conflict. Most games are fun, but this game is not like most games. Rainsford is forced to play this game against Zaroff. In the Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connell, the central man vs. man conflict changes Rainsford from the hunter, to the huntee, and back to the hunter.
The next conflict introduced is man vs man. However Man vs. Man is the most obvious conflict. Rainsford and General Zaroff are fighting for different goals, Zaroff is fighting for fun and amusement and Rainsford is fighting for his survival and his chance to leave the island. Throughout the story, they argue on morals and belief, and in a deadly game. In the text it states "let me congratulate you.
This quote, spoken by Rainsford, suggests that the jungle represents not just a physical location, but also a mindset of primal instincts and the struggle to survive. The final example of man versus nature conflict is Rainsford versus quicksand. This is a conflict for Rainsford because when he gets trapped in the quicksand he doesn’t know if he is going to get out. Rainsford has to persevere through and put in all of his strength to get free of the
The Most Dangerous Game In the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, the protagonist, Sanger Rainsford, and the antagonist, General Zaroff, are similar characters. Both Rainsford and Zaroff share common passions, skills and ideology. Initially, there is admiration between both characters, because Rainsford is Zaroff’s hero and Rainsford is grateful for Zaroff being welcome to him. However.
Conflicts are always significant to making a story suspenseful and more interesting. In “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Canell, there are three different primary conflicts. The conflicts person vs. person, person vs. nature, and person vs. self are the three dominant issues in “The Most Dangerous Game”. Person vs. person is probably the most identifiable conflict in this story. Rainsford faces multiple different conflicts with other people; one of those is Zaroff hunting him for three days when he simply just wanted to go home.
He had to fight himself to stay on track. He was so scared in the jungle while the General was trying to hunt him. On page 186, it says “He could not say where he was. That was suicide.” This shows the reader that Rainsford may be thinking of what could go wrong, and is not thinking on the positive side of things.
Not only was rainsford in a conflict with General Zaroff he is in conflict with himself as he is finding his way to Ship Trap Island. “‘I must keep my nerve, I must keep my nerve,’ he said through tight teeth” (12). Rainsford also had a conflict with himself on the island when he was deciding what to do to get away from Zaroff. Rainsford was able to overcome the internal conflict when the dogs were chasing him and he needed to make the decision to jump into the water, fight the dogs, or climb a tree and hide. Man versus himself is very important to Connell’s story.
Nikita Khrushchev once claimed, “If you live among wolves you have to act like a wolf.” Khrushchev means that if a person lives surrounded by those who are ferocious or voracious, then that person is obligated to behave like them. Similarly, Richard Connell addresses this idea in the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by displaying a change of mentality within a character when that individual is put into a fearful situation. Specifically, he uses conflict in order to develop the theme that the one’s will to survive outweighs one’s will to be civilized if life depends on it.
This is both his external conflict and an unexpected turn of events. Eventually, although this was tough for him, Rainsford ends up winning the game. When informed that he had won Rainsford responded: “I am still a beast at bay; he
The Most Dangerous Game Conflicts All stories have to have a conflict, the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell has three important conflicts. Man against man, man against nature, man against himself are the three main conflicts that take place. For man against man Rainsford and General Zaroff are fighting each other in the hunting ‘game’. For man against nature Rainsford is fighting the sea once he hears the gunshots and is trying to get out of the water.
At least sixty percent of people in the world agree there is two sides to everyone. After certain events, one side appears more often than the other. The traits that people possess on these sides are acknowledged as civil or uncivil attributes. In “The Most Dangerous Game”, Richard Connell proves Rainsford and Zaroff have civil and savage traits that make them seem two sided, but these traits emerge based on the conflict the character is faces. Sanger Rainsford lives a civil life; however, dangerous situations cause him to show his savage side.
Together with all the problems Rainsford is facing he acts strong and keeps on fighting. Rainsford is discerned with many problems throughout the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell to make a satisfied ending. In the story Rainsford almost got shot in the head with a revolver. Caught in a giant abyss of quicksand.
In the short story ‘’The Most Dangerous Game’’, Richard Connell uses irony and human savagery to explain how the character, Rainsford, develops through his thoughts and emotions. Connell used irony to show how Rainsford’s feelings (or emotions) changed throughout the story. At the beginning of the story, Rainsford thought that the prey that he hunted felt no emotion, as if they were unable to feel and emotion while they are being hunted. This all changes when he finds out that he has become the prey when Zaroff starts hunting him. He starts off feeling a bit of fear and anger, but then it escalates to only one thing: fear.