There is a famous saying that goes, “sticks and stones may break me but words cannot.” This is false as often people are genuinely hurt or offended by certain comments and an offensive comment may have a lasting downing effect on the person. Hence political correctness is to a degree essential and important to our society however it is necessary that do not over impose political correctness as it censors our society to the extent that it is bland and meaningless and in extreme instances it make our society hypocritical as it makes people hide their true view and
When asked Saumya said “It’s abuse of free speech, since you’re just bashing someone else.” Using your freedom of speech to hit on theirs is a abuse of free speech. In reality, though what is actually being accomplished, besides trying to deteriorate others soul and being in such a provisional way. Hurting others because you think how they are is not right is a ridiculous way of thinking in this day and age. Using hate has not resolved any issues and sure is not making anyone believe that they are any more wrong in their
However, this idea overshadows how similar our countries really are. Censorship occurs everywhere, even in the “Land of the Free”. Things are swept under the rug and kept from people for the “greater good”, but should not the greater good be for people to know what is going on in the world they live in? People constantly post things just to have them removed; social media is a tremendous platform to inform and educate people on things that the news refuses to cover or hides. Concealing information and censoring the media defeats the purpose of the First Amendment and goes against the foundation of our country.
The security of state means legislature can enact laws which would impose restrictions on expressions which endanger the security of the State and is intended to overthrow the government or wagering a war against the government. Public order means public peace, safety and tranquility of the people at large. The absence of public order is an aggravated form of disturbance of public peace, which affects the general life of the public. Any speech which intends to disturb public order can be restricted by enacting laws. The decency and morality includes the state can put restriction on forms of expression if they are considered to be indecent, immoral or obscene.
The power of social media retaliation and judgement has become astonishing. In reality, I could intentionally post specific opinions that could land me on no-fly list and cause quite a large uproar from antagonists in a matter of hours. Alter makes an agreeable point by saying we all have the right to disagree with each other, but not dismantle their personage. Being publicly proven wrong and having the chance to defend yourself, or reflect and apologize is all that should be preferred. Americans are fortunate to live in a country of free speech; however, it has created a society that nearly inhibits itself from the right which is exactly not what America stands for.
Governments love to control their nations, and a way of controlling their ideas is by censoring information, which citizens have every human right to access. Censorship is unnecessary because in some cases, it blinds people from the truth. It also leads to misunderstandings that tend to cause disputes. Media
Since, this is an ethical question. In my opinion, Freedom of speech should be limited, because it is not acceptable that everybody say whatever he/she wants. There are insufficient of people who frequently use freedom of speech and they are Governors, Journalists, and other citizens. Another thing is the governments are the people who are able to have freedom of speech, so they should not be more doing that. Everyone is the same as the other or there would not be equality, if the governors can have freedom of speech, while the other didn’t then that will be unfair.
Such censorship would lead to a totalitarian rule by the majority . While hate speech should be better understood, bigoted acts should not be included in hate speech or harmful subjective phrases. hate speech has become a spotlight topic and there is a discussion if free speech should protect it. The main opposition against free speech being an
Therefore, lying in order to achieve something, such as marketing goals, would be considered unethical in accordance to the universal approach. Kant expands this approach: “Whenever you manipulate others for your own ends, you are using them as a means to get your way, not treating them as uniquely valuable individuals” (Ch. 3 Duties, p. 40). I am uncertain if one can assess the work of a PR or Marketing specialist as unethical, because they are not telling the truth (lying) to potential buyers – Companies do not necessarily recreate the truth. However, they sure do manipulate people’s buying decisions by persuading them of a/the truth through the use of strategic communication.
Now, the question is that whether this Advertisement is ethical or not? It means the firms should not make the advertisement in a way that misguided the consumer, especially the youth. Surrogate advertising is one of the arising ethical issues in a country like India, where advertising another product with a similar brand name, as the original product’s advertisement is stated banned by the laws of the country. It is done to leave the brand impact in the minds of consumer. Heating debates over the issue of Surrogacy Advertising whether it is ethical or not, as these advertisement not only misguide but also shows false information.