The Americans faced taxes such as the Sugar Act, Stamp Act and Townshend Act due to Britain having to make up for the money they had lost to war. The people of America essentially felt that Britain was being unreasonable “for imposing taxes on us without our consent”. The taxes were passed by Parliament in which there were no American representation. This lead to Americans protesting the taxes that lacked representation and the Virginia House of Burgess stating that "the taxation of the people by themselves, or by persons chosen by themselves to represent them... is the only security against a burdensome taxation, and [is] the distinguishing characteristic of British freedom". The Stamp Act caused Americans to protest and refuse to buy or import British goods.
He hated slavery, he hated what became of the debacle with Britain over Oregon, and he hated how aggressive Polk became towards Mexico. He then came to the conclusion that people were accepting Polk’s unjust action and could do nothing about it. In turn, he wrote the essay now known as “Civil Disobedience” which core basis is what a citizen should do if he or she believes that a law or action is defined as unjust. He goes on to speak how the reader could protest through non-violent actions. Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience” spread across space and time which inspired the works, Dr. Martin Luther King.
A is incorrect, because the royal governor of the Dominion of New England Sir Edmund Andros was not popular in Boston. Prior to the royal governor’s arrival, the people of Boston were already agitated with the royal government for the restrictions being imposed on Massachusetts. First the Navigation Act requiring colonies to trade only through Britain limited the choice of trading that they were accustomed to. Then when the Massachusetts legislature declared that the Navigation Act had no legal standing in their colony the Lords of Trade annulled the character of Massachusetts and absorbed Massachusetts into the Dominion of New England. The colonists of Boston were not thrilled by that, and their irritation only grew when their new authoritarian
Thesis: The Dutch were infuriated by the Hapsburg rulers of Spain and openly opposed them due to the way in which the rulers imposed a ridiculous amount of religious intolerance and taxation which led to the Dutch Revolt. Contextualization: Iconoclast riots in the Netherlands Tax revolts and refusal to pay Pacification of Ghent - alliance of northern Dutch independent states to drive Spanish out of their countries. Body Paragraph #1 Topic sentence: Because the Dutch were dominantly Protestant and the Spanish were primarily Catholic, the religious disputes between each country assisted in political tensions.
The first law under effect, has closed Boston Harbor to all shipping until we pay back for their tea that we dumped and show them proper respect. First of all, we will not show the British any further respect for they have no respect for us. But the problem for us is how will be be able to proceed our businesses and trading when Boston Harbor is closed. The second law now puts Massachusetts in complete British authority, in which now our governors are appointed by King George III. With this law in effect, it is considered a violation for us to hold town meetings without the governor’s permission.
He believes their actions regarding the Boston Tea Party were unacceptable. There were plenty of other ways to rebel against the Tea Act. The Sons of Liberty were acting inappropriately during the Boston Tea Party. By, going through with the Boston Tea Party only made life for the colonists brutal. As a result of the the disobedience of the Sons of Liberty, the Coercive Act (also known as the Intolerable Act) was launched.
Then the Stamp Act was passed on March 22, 1765. The Stamp Act was a time when the british crown raised taxes and made the price of living go up. Which was a burden on the Americans. In March 1774 60 men had boarded a ship and dumped tea into the Boston Harbor, then the Americans started to boycott the
The American Revolution couldn’t have been avoided. First and foremost, I do strongly believe the american revolution couldn’t of been have been avoided. According to enotes.com “ The American Revolution could perhaps have been postponed even longer. If the british had given the colonies representation in parliament”. But again that was to keep delaying the American Revolution for a longer time.
These laws were called the Intolerable Acts by the colonists. These laws were considered extreme by the colonists as they closed Boston Harbor, made it so all law cases pertaining to British officials had to be held in Britain, banned town meetings, and made Massachusetts colonists house and feed the British regulars. The colonists thought this was an unreasonable reaction, but in all reality Britain really should have done this
Many Americans began to despise monarchy and began to call the actions of the crown unjust. Leading to riots of the actions of the British Government and beginning the sparks for the American Civil War. As we can see the French and Indian War was a long and complicated war. This war caused the final sparks needed to stir up a rebellion by the Colonists in America.
There were three primary goals of why the British planned to reform the colonial relations. The first goal was to eliminate the corruption of the royal officials and crack down on smuggling. The colonies were using smuggling as a way to avoid taxes. Therefore the British used this method as a way to tighten control. The second goal was the limits they placed on the colonist telling them where they could live.
These boycotts against British shipping were the best manner for the colonists to demonstrate their distain for British rule. In Virginia, the boycott of the ports was a significant move that ultimately pushed the citizens in the area towards independence. The other cause that pushed the gentry to revolution stemmed from the unforeseen consequences of their boycott of British shipping. This would result in their protests of 1774 turning into the revolutionary movement of 1775 up until the Treaty of Paris in 1783 that ended the war, giving independence to the United States (Holton xviii). Referred to as Non-exportation, this protest was directly against the Coercive Acts that Parliament adopted for the colonies (Holton 124).
The Boston Port Act closed the Boston Harbor. The Massachusetts Government Act restricted democratic meetings of the town and the governor 's council was an appointed body. The Administration of Justice Act said that if a British Official commits a crime they are sent back to Britain to be prosecuted. The Quartering Act said that the colonists had to provide a home to British soldiers if needed. These acts were all in direct response to the Boston Tea Party and infuriated the colonists.