Consequentialism And Climate Change

I agree, it is factual that we are facing severe environmental challenges. Even if the skeptics do not believe in the global warming, it is undeniable that the air and water pollution are caused by human activities. It is unhelpful to argue who is right, who gets more evidences or who eventually wins. If people just ignore the negative environmental impacts and do not implement any practical plans to deal with, our future generation will definitely suffer from

Climate change. Is it really a bad thing? With all the natural disasters that happened in the past decades, society has a firm, deeply rooted belief that the main culprit, the cause of all havoc, is none other than climate change. Thousands of organizations are fighting the war against climate change. They condemn heatwaves for causing water disruption, for melting glaciers, etc.

Comparative Analysis Naomi Klein’s and Collin’s may not have the same ideological terms and definitions to approach global warming; thus, they both share the idea to demonstrate the global warming change as a facing danger that we must eradicate. Collins with “Toxic Loopholes” emphasizes more on investigation and international negotiations in environmental law. Naomi focuses on recruiting people for “blockadia” activism sharing her activism through her journalist job. Naomi believes that we are “guests” on this planet capable of changing the royal society and the nations with renewable energy. Her work stands out because she demonstrates real-life stories together with an analysis in powerful, abrupt and memorable ways.

In conclusion, The Lorax is an essential tool in understanding “The Tragedy of the Commons.” The Lorax depicts what Garrett Hardin wrote in his essay. There may not be a sure fire way of saving the world from ourselves, but if we are willing to act as a whole we could potentially save the world. Let 's

The answer to these questions lies in what we value and how we value. These are questions of ethics and morality. Some of the major underlying norms in climate change mitigation like intergenerational equity, shared but differentiated responsibility and polluter pays principle involves questions of ethics, morality and cooperation. To go a step further, we also need to question the validity of these norms and find out if they are sufficient to deal with climate change.

pg. 4). Sometimes I wish that global warming is just the world pulling a prank on us, but I feel its not doing that with us. Global warming is one of the greatest discussions this world has ever had. The U.S.A. is discussing why this is happening. In the unsigned article Global Warming the writer wrote, ” Crowded landfills, polluted water, and poor air quality are just a few of the environmental problems that affect both industrial and developing nations”(“Global” par.1).

There is a quote by President Barack Obama saying, “To truly transform our economy, protect our security, and save our planet from the ravages of climate change, we need to ultimately make clean, renewable energy the profitable kind of energy,” (“151 Inspiring Environmental Quotes”). He believes as many due that nonrenewable resources are harmful to all aspects of life. The energy we use now is harmful to our planet, to humans, and to animals. Scientists are taking steps to making the world a better place. They found sources that replenished naturally in a short amount of time and are less destructive in all aspects.

We look for social tags or cues and tend to pay much more attention to topics that “people like us” find important. This leads to a self-reinforcing mechanism: social groups can make a specific topic omnipresent – or completely taboo. WE IGNORE INFORMATION ALL THE TIME - FOLLOWING OUR PEERS' SOCIAL CUES

Currently, long period of drought, tropical storms, as well as rising sea levels are really and truly existing phenomena resulted from climate change (Global Climate Change: Evidence 2008). Evidently, human activities are the major causes, some people, however, still intentionally disregard that their patterns of behavior are leading to the irreversible climate issues, such as the American Republicans. In order for our Earth to restore to health, national governments as the most commanding organizations within countries have to come up with effective, efficient, and corresponding strategies to guide their citizens to adapt the existing climate change and more importantly to prevent from potential man-made disasters, respectively. Examining causes are definitely the first step to tackle problems, not to mention climate issues. To be more specific on climate topics, burning fossil fuel has been the radical basis of our economy since the Industrial Revolution, whereas a fatal impact is destroying our living planet: carbon dioxide is incredibly accumulating in the atmosphere due to the exploitation of fossil fuel.

So far, conventional solutions to global warming — new government policies and changes in individual behaviour — haven't delivered. And more radical options, such as pumping sulphur into the atmosphere to counteract warming, pose a great deal of risk. There may be another route to avoid the potentially disastrous effects of climate change: We can deliberately alter ourselves, three researchers suggest. Human engineering, as they call it, poses less danger than altering our planet through geo-engineering, and it could augment changes to personal behaviour or policies to mitigate climate change, they write in an article to be published in the journal Ethics, Policy and the Environment. "We are serious philosophers, but we might not be entirely

Bringing attention to climate change should reinforce the Democratic advantage among groups like educated professionals, young people and all of whom helped form the Obama coalition. If Democrats and climate hawks keep pushing the GOP on the issue, it could ultimately force Republicans to accept climate science and embrace climate action, just as years of successful Republican attacks on Democrats coerced them into supporting harsh anti-crime and

Scientists will demonstrate how climate change threatens the existence of the ecosystem and the life of people who depend on agriculture, and “warn that in some countries, climate change is viewed as a potential war issue”, which might transform into a global security issue eventually science will offer you the facts, but we need more than facts to take action. What we decide to do will depend on what we think is right after considering the facts, including what we think of social justice, the way we understand the responsibility of our actions, and our personal views on what you value. These are moral and ethical questions. There are also specific ‘cultural questions’ that need to be addressed when considering the challenges of climate change. Culture relates profoundly to the human dimensions of climate change.

When discussion on climate change comes up, people tend to ignore it or groan about it. Some people feel that it's their fault and worry about it. Every person has their own perspective on climate change, David Roberts in his “Climate change is Simple” video talks about climate and temperature not being stable any more and rising temperature can affect living things on this planet. On the other hand, Nic Marks in his “The Happy Planet Index” video talks about the planet itself, but focuses more on the happiness of human beings and the planet earth. So, Why is it important for us to keep the temperature down?