Conservative Christianity, also known as Fundamentalism, is the belief that everything in the bible should be taken literally. However, Liberal Christianity, also known as Modernism, is the belief that God could be understood simply through the use of scriptures and by utilizing the same modern interpretations that are also used to understand any ancient passages, symbols, and scriptures (Pals, 2006). Conservative Christianity is commonly viewed as being the thinking and beliefs of the past and they make up the fundamentals of Christianity, hence their other name Fundamentalism. On the other hand, Liberal Christianity is viewed as being the “modern” way of thinking and believing in Christianity, hence the name Modernism. These differences separate …show more content…
One similarity is that Liberals and Conservatives agree that hierarchies should be used as an organizing principle of society which is something that they both have kept the same for many years. Another commonality that they share is their view on equal opportunities for all (Handout #1). They both support the idea of everyone being able to live another person’s life in the sense that someone poor could still receive the education that a wealthy person gets.
Liberal and Conservative Christianity are very different in the ways that they handled their encounters with the other world religions. There are two types of Conservative Christians; exclusionist and inclusionists. Exclusionists believe that only their religion is correct while everyone else is completely wrong whereas inclusionists believe that they are completely right while every other religion is only partially true (Pals, 2006). Conservative Christianity’s encounter with other world religions has not been well since they view other religions to be very similar (even when they are not)
…show more content…
He named this new philosophy Positivism and it greatly influenced “the emerging disciplines of sociology (Durkheim, Weber) [and] anthropology (E. B. Tylor, James Frazer)” (Handout #1). Marx and Durkheim both interpreted religion as “illusions created by a needy consciousness that fabricates them” and Marx, who was once an important disciple of Hegel, rejected Hegelianism and turned “towards materialism and atheism” which led him to these interpretations (Handout #1). However, Durkheim wanted to prove that religion was actually created by society rather than the supernatural (Pals, 2006). He interpreted religion as being a meaning for life and he viewed it as a crucial part of society. The naturalistic-reductionist assumptions informing these disciplines included the influences of the philosophy of Positivism and Hegelianism. Karl Marx and Émile Durkheim had reductionist views which means that they believed that religion preformed specific functions for society (such as capitalism). However, Tylor and Frazer both share the naturalistic view which means that people believe in religion because it makes sense as long as it is valuable and understandable. Tylor and Frazer specifically focus on the explanatory value of religion for its supporters whereas
David Émile Durkheim is the well-known sociologist who is well known and concerned to promote peace harmony and reconciliation. Émile Durkheim defined religion as "a unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things, that is to say, things set apart and forbidden -- beliefs and practices which unite into one single moral community called a Church all those who adhere to them.". (Durkheim, 2008). To make a point Emile Durkheim believed that society was a religion and that “religion affected the establishment of society to such a degree that the two were inseparable.” (Durkheim, 2008).
The story of American Religion is one of migration, be it from immigrants from other countries or from the movement of Americans from city to city and from state to state. This is especially true of American Southerners who, during the Great Depression, moved out of their homeland and to the more industrial areas of the country like Detroit or Los Angeles. When these Southerners migrated to Los Angeles and Southern California, they brought with them their evangelical religious beliefs. In “From Bible Belt to Sun Belt,” author Darren Dochuk describes how that brand of southern evangelicalism initially shaped Southern California, and then US politics as a whole, through cultural clashes with the existing New Deal Democrats of the area, by
A multi-volume group of essays published in 1910, called The Fundamentals. This publication attempted to arrest the drift of Protestant belief. The source that labeled conservatives as “Fundamentalists,” came from this publication of essays, which influenced fundamentalists a lot. The meaning of the word “fundamentalism” has expanded since the 1920s. The word’s meaning has expanded in the press, in academia, and in ordinary language.
While Conservatives are those who abhor change, and want to return the United States to a time that they feel is ideal. This time seems to be debated, with many believing that the 1950’s was the ideal time that society should be returning to. While others believe, it is the 1980’s during the Reagan Era that was the ideal time for the American people. Liberals on the other hand, do not want to return the country back to a “better time”. They want the country to progress and change in a positive manner that includes the protection of rights and freedoms of everyone living within the United States.
When one thinks of liberals and conservatives it tends to be a comparison of entirely different views concerning every issue. Conservative thinking is regularly associated with the Republican Party while liberal thinking is regularly associated with the Democratic Party. Two such figures that come to mind whose views tend to put them on opposite sides of the political spectrum are presidents Herbert C. Hoover and Harry S. Truman. For example, Hoover's failure to intervene in the private sector of the economy during the infant stages of the Great Depression agrees with the conservative idea of a free market economy. In contrast, Truman continued Roosevelt's liberally supported reform measures.
Before the early twentieth century, Americans either swayed republican or democratic, but as the country reached the 1900s liberal and conservative ideals surfaced into many citizens’ mindsets. Liberals were people with modern ideas and believed that in order to better the American society, there needed to be room for change. Conservatives, however, believed in tradition and had strong beliefs on sticking to the original way of life in America. President Herbert Hoover, who was seen as a conservative, was elected in 1929. Under the republican party, many Americans liked him because he worked his way to the top.
In 1897, under the guidance of of president’s Willian McKinley, the United States had the victory over the Spanish and American war in 1898. During this time, the American empire invaded Puerto Rico, Guam, Hawaii and the Philippines and became a big American Imperialism in U.S history. The United States decided to make Puerto Rico and Guam became an insular area under the sovereignty of the United States, organized territory but not incorporated in the United States. Hawaii became a parts of the U.S and last Philippines had rules under by the U.S for many years before gave them the right to self-government.
The conservative view upon illegal immigration is as follows: “Support legal immigration only. Oppose amnesty for those who enter the U.S. illegally (illegal immigrants). Those who break the law by entering the U.S. illegally do not have the same rights as those who obey the law and enter legally. The borders should be secured before addressing the problem of the illegal immigrants currently in the country. The Federal Government should secure the borders and enforce current immigration law” (Conservative vs. Liberal Beliefs).
Like Freud, Marx strongly believed that religion was created as a form of security. Nietzsche viewed religion as something humans resort to in times of desperation. They turn to religion when they are seeking meaning in their own life. Nietzsche believed that religion made
When trying to define a word such as Liberalism it seems difficult to find a solid definition. There are different forms of liberalism and different meanings depending on the time period it is being applied to (idea taken from Phil Badger author from philosophynow). To solve this ambiguity, I’ve decided to define liberalism based on the time period in which I will be conducting my research. Liberalism in the 1700s was the belief of freedom and equals rights generally associated with the enlightenment thinkers, John Locke and Montesquieu (as defined by wikipedia.org). Liberalism didn’t start in the 1700s.
Liberal is a paradigm which is a belief in the positive uses of government to bring justice, equality of opportunity, peace and looks more to the nature of state. Liberalism is a philosophy based on the belief about the ultimate value of individual freedom and the opportunities for human progress. Liberalism is talking about rationality, moral autonomy, human rights, democracy, opportunity, and choice that built upon commitment to the principles of freedom and equality. There is a long traditional in Liberal thinking about international relations’ characteristic. . Liberalist are thinking how to create a peaceful relation among country up to relation among individual and one of the sytemic and deeper explanation is brought by a German philospher, Immanuel Kant with his essay entitled “Perpetual Peace” .
Definition: Ideology is ideology and values of the nature of the good life, the social, economic, moral values, and the role of government. "Liberalism" and "conservative spirit" are the two dominant system of beliefs and values in America and Texas life today 1/ Ideology Conservatism: - Basic Principles of conservative economic policy is economic floating, but conservatives practice often pursue "economic floating false," that is, the affirmation of economic theory does not follow law what practices produce results both best practices connected with support of government policies help business overcome difficulties in marketplace. - Often described as being on the "right-wing" of the political trends, conservatives argue that the economic
…Was not Jesus an extremist for love: "Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, and pray for them which despitefully use you. " Was not Amos an extremist for justice: "Let justice roll down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream. " Was not Paul an extremist for the Christian gospel: "I bear on my body the marks of the Lord Jesus. " Was not Martin Luther an extremist: "Here I stand; I can do no other so help me God."
It can be hard to find your political view. Sometimes it takes time and research on political issues in our country and around the world. There are two popular political views; conservative and liberal. The definition for a conservative; is holding to traditional attitudes and values and cautious about change or innovation, typically in relation to politics or religion. Liberal definition is; open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values.
Holly Kinsella 13528163 Q.2 Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim developed very different sociological theories of how society evolves over time. Marx brought around the conflict theory and became the head of the sociological discipline of Marxism. Durkheim was a French Functionalist, meaning he looked at society in a scientific way. Although Marx and Durkheim had different ways of thinking about society, both have contributed significantly to the way we study sociology today. Karl Marx was a German philosopher who became the head of the sociological discipline of Marxism.