In the present society, individual’s or a state’s view of crime and criminals are generally categorized into either the conservative ideology or the liberal ideology. The conservative theology is based on personal responsibility and the rational choice theory which is to say “No”. It mentions that the root cause of crime is moral poverty rather than material poverty. They believe in giving severe punishment which has its own consequences. On the other hand, the liberal theology says to alter the social influences to help solve crime. It believes in correction rather than punishment. Due to the modernization of the population, it brings in liberal way to sort problems rather than the conventional way. However, the conservative theology has been …show more content…
In their defense, by sentencing people to severe punishments and jail term, they can instill fear among the general public, thereby reducing crimes. One example of this is the mandatory minimum sentencing policies for drug offenders. In the Article “What Conservatives Are Saying About Criminal Justice Reform & Right on Crime” by Grover Norquist, it mentions that in 2008, taxpayers spent about $5.4 billion on federal prisons which is an astonishing 925% increase since 1982. This is due to the surge of the use of prison sentences for drug crimes and the use of the mandatory minimum sentencing policy which usually begins with ten years. Drug offenders are the largest category of offenders entering federal prisons each year. With the conservative way of thinking, the government gives severe punishments to such offenders rather than focusing on liberal ways of solving the same issue by focusing on rehabilitation programs. It is quite evident that the severe punishment ideology has not been helping reduce such offenders, instead it just piles on the already overcrowded prisons. Thereby, lacking sanitation, failure of health care, spread of diseases, and increase in stress and violence. Hence, worsening the current conditions of the prisoners and the way criminals are …show more content…
With privatization of prisons, the government reduces its burden, and at the same time, companies seek this opportunity to make profits. According to a new study from the University of Wisconsin, privatized prisons are keeping inmates locked up longer in order to boost profits. Poor people are merely arrested for harmless activities that include sleeping, loitering, and just sitting or lying down in public which influences the meaning of crime itself. Hence, along with longer sentences, criminalization of poverty has also taken place. In the New York City Jail system, 31% of non-felony defendants are held because they can’t pay a $500 bail. Hence, in order to boost the number of inmates to benefit the privatization of prisons, poor people are being targeted which influences the way criminals are being treated. It is unfortunate to see how offenders are being treated with severe punishments and to see how poor people are being targeted for crimes which only helps the prison companies to make profit. Unfortunately privatization of prisons has led to criminalization of poverty. Instead of focusing and investing on rehabilitation programs and home shelters, the government still sticks to the conservatism way of viewing
Jeffrey Reiman, author of The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison, first published his book in 1979, it is now in its sixth edition, and he has continued to revise it as he keeps up on criminal justice statistics and other trends in the system. This book he wrote is like a textbook for the class with many different sources cited to give the thorough knowledge for criminal justice major. As we read through the book we will get to know that he figured out something very deeply about cultural sense, which helped him a lot to collect public information. The main focus of this book is the title itself, because the rich get richer and the poor get prison, says a lot, which is happening in the country due to our present economic system. In this system author is trying to define the true definition of crime and criminal, uneven wealth distribution, poverty and criminal justice system that does to protect us against the gravest
The industry has much power in states that learn further right-wing in the political sphere; mostly due to the views of many regarding the restriction of the government power and preference for the privation of most all services. When prisons are privatized, profits then become the main purpose and as a result, those incarcerated in privatized institutions often suffer as a result; mostly in the poor food, labor conditions, and overcrowding. This issue of terrible conditions of these prisons doesn’t just influence the incarcerated, they instead affect society as they often fail at rehabilitation, even at a higher rate than public, creating more crime when those incarcerated are reintroduced into
In the documentary film Private Prisons, provides insight on how two private prisons industries, Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) and Geo Group, generate revenue through mass incarceration. It is no surprise that the United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world. The United States represents approximately 5% of the world’s population index and approximately 25% of the world’s prisoners due to expansion of the private prison industry complex (Private Prisons, 2013). The number of people incarcerated in private prions has grown exponentially over the past decades. To put into perspective, the number of individuals increased by 1600% between 1990 and 2005 (Private Prisons, 2003).
The amount of rapid growth in inmate population is almost as startling as the profit made from the prison industrial complex itself. Although it has substantial political power, the prison industrial complex consists of private companies and corporations. The key economic components revolved around the prison industrial complex are the use of inmates as basically free labor and the notion that more prisons indicate more jobs. As Angela Davis illuminated, the focus is on making a profit through punishment rather than rehabilitating individuals and providing them with services to help reduce the rates of crime.
They are in response to the problems of society and also because of the development on criminal justice reform. They also do this because they are trying to reduce recidivism and supply training that will then lead to reintegration. One reason why they did this is because they want to stop recidivism and make sure that those who were accused of a crime or even convicted want them to be prosecuted be punished and reformed. In today's society it is rare to find a prison that does not have a rehabilitative focus.
Some of the different strategies that Public Services use to prevent crime are Incapacitation, rehabilitation, deterrence, transcarceration and retribution. Incapacitation is the response used when a person has committed a crime. By incapacitating the convict and putting them in prison, it prevents the individual from committing future crimes because they are removed from society and locked up or restrained. I think prisons are effective because it protects society from dangerous and violent criminals and also it isolates those who deserve such a punishment from their family and friends (retribution). Prison stops offenders re-offending as they are locked away and acts as a deterrent to people on the outside.
In today's society more and more violence is occurring each and everyday. With the increase of violence, the inmate population grows and locations of inhabiting inmates are rising as well. In his article, Private prisons, career correctional administrator and academic, Richard P. Setier argues that the private prisons care about the well being of inmate not about making money. Setier jumps right into debunking myths and explains the realities and educational side of private prisons. He explains how they myths stem form inadequate information of what the corportation represent and what they value
Thesis: It is very important for the sake of Americans tax dollars that we change the way that prisons are run and increase the productivity of inmates so when they are released from jail they are ready to be a productive member in society and have the confidence to achieve new goals. Introduction: Day after day, millions of inmates sit in jail doing nothing productive with their lives. We are paying to house inmates that may not even have a good reason to be there. For example, drug offenders are being kept with murderers and other violent offenders.
The United States of America is known across the world as one of the biggest superpowers, both in its military and economy. It is a democratic nation that runs on a successful capitalist system, which especially benefits those in positions of power. In the 1960’s, 200,000 people were incarcerated across the country, however this number has increased rapidly in the last fifty years and now more than 2 million people are incarcerated in prisons and detention centres all across the United States, leading to what is described as an age of mass incarceration. There is evidence to suggest that mass incarceration does benefit the American capitalist system and that the institution of criminal justice is beneficial to capital gain. America is a nation that prides itself on truth and justice for all its citizens, however it could be argued that America values its capitalist advancement more than the individual rights of the people who live there and consequently marginalises and discriminates against its African American and Latino communities in order to further its capitalist system.
In addition to greatly affecting the otherwise unlikely citizens of America, Tough on Crime policies have greatly affected minority groups in America; perhaps more so than of any other group of citizens. To begin, from the 1980 on through the year 1995, the incarceration rates among drug offenders increased by more than 1000 percent. Notably, by the year 1995 one out of every four inmates in any given correctional facility was a drug offender. In addition of that 1000 percent increase, drug offenders accounted for more than 80 percent of the total growth in the federal inmate population and 50 percent of the growth of the state prison population from 1985 to 1995 (Stith, web). In addition, once in the system, the probability of receiving harsher
The criminal justice system may be more corrupt than the people who fill our prisons. It is amazing to see the many ways that certain parts of society actually benefit from the current system we support. This book,The Rich Get Richer and The Poor Get Prison, by authors Jeffrey Reiman and Paul Leighton, has open my eyes to a very corrupt idealism. They are very precise in their supporting examples as well by walking the reader through each step and analogy.
V. PRISON REFORMS The main part of this research paper is the reforms for the conditions of prison and make prison a better place for prisoner and make an alternative for incarceration. The prison Reform for prevention of overcrowding in prisons: A ten-point method for reducing the overcrowding in the prisons all over the world, these points are1: 1. Collect and use data to inform a rational, humane and cost-effective use of prison.
These factors create vulnerable circumstances for both inmates and the society. Moreover, these are possibly clear symbols of a failed concept, this raises questions on the methodological aspect of private prisons. Another disturbing effect the privatization of prisons has contributed to, is noted by Ecenbarger, (2012). It involves a case whereby thousands of young men, were wrongfully convicted with many not even receiving legal representation.
III. Prison system affects poverty ● America 's prison system is increasing the poverty in The United states. According to “Out of prison and out of work: Jobs out of reach for former inmates” an article by published by CNN, written by Tanzina Vega the united states has 5 percent of the world 's population but 25 percent of its prison population. A large part of this is due to unemployment. As can be seen in an article published by VICE named “Why Is Getting a Job After Prison Still Such a Nightmare for Ex-Cons?”.
The privatization has a much more positive connotation due to its relationship with capitalism, yet thus far prison privatization has been a spectacular flavor but with considerable reform will be successful. While capitalism may be good for business, it does not appear to be a good fit for prisons. Many past studies and crimes against humanity have shown that the best-proven method to keeping a large number of people in order and under the control of their authority is by dehumanizing and using significant force as seen in the Stanford prison experiment. If private prisons were to employ such methods, it would decrease the number of guards necessary, but would certainly violate the rights of the inmates. Statistics from the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) state that private institutes employ 33% fewer correctional officers