The Cause Of Caesar's Defeat Of The Roman Republic

Caesar’s expedition in Gaul was to some extent the cause of the breakup of the First Triumvirate. While Caesar’s expedition in Gaul brought him unrivaled glory and status, which might have upset the First Triumvirate balance of power and turned the senate against him, due to instability in Roman politics, the alliance between Caesar and Pompey was already on uneasy grounds. Crassus’ death during his campaign in Parthia unsettled the First Triumvirate, resulting in a faceoff for power between Caesar and Pompey and a tip in balance that even further lessened the power of the senate. Historians such as Goldsworthy even argue that Pompey was reluctant to go to war and had not the Senate intervened, the alliance could have continued. Before Caesar’s expedition in Gaul, Caesar only a politician with little military experience (Goldsworthy 15).

When Brutus’ speech occurs, Shakespeare utilizes rhetorical questions, pathos, and tone in order to suggest that Caesar was too ambitious and could possibly enslave the citizens of Rome so he should be killed , which proves Oscar Wilde’s claim that disobedience is a valuable human trait and that it does promote social progress. This text is important because Caesar made a big impact on people and his closest friends turned their back on him. Without Julius Caesar, the world would not be what it is today. Caesar helped shape Rome into a great international power with a profound influence on the world. His military exploits led to the incorporation of new lands and people under the umbrella of

One of the likely reasons Julius Caesar was killed was his obliviousness to stay seated while the Senators went to the sanctuary of Venus Genetrix. Suetonius saw this condition as a reprehensible affront (78). As well as Appian who reports it as "slanderers a reason for indicting him of wishing to be welcomed as a ruler" (107). As a matter of fact Suetonius says that Julius had a negative reaction to Pontinus Aquila when he didn 't ascend for him (78). In some ways Julius is being hypocritical towards Aquila, but Julius doing the exact same insult to the senate.

Roosevelt faced many opponents in his rule for not doing enough or doing too much to help. He said “I am waging a war against Destruction, Delay, Deceit and Despair”. Roosevelt in the extremity of sorting out “destruction” and “despair” had to take drastic measures. As a result, the New Deal did not benefit everyone causing a great deal of controversy. Some of his policies were seen as an attack on individual freedom and the aging American constitution.

Brutus is introduced to the play as a well intentioned and respected politician in Rome, with many supporters within the senate, as well as a close friend of Julius Caesar. As he learns of the plot to kill Caesar, he is convinced by the conspirators that Caesar is a tyrant in disguise, and that it is in the best interest of Rome that he should not lead. Brutus’ innocently patriotic love of Rome led him believe that killing Caesar was necessary, a sentiment shared and bolstered by the other conspirators. An excellent example of the conspirators betraying

As stated by Sealey, “The Romans treated the Iceni as if they were a nation that had been defeated and forced to surrender.” In addition to this, Seneca “chose this moment to call in the huge sums he had lent to the Britons”, suggested by the hordes of Roman coins buried during the revolt, and the Romans also enforced conscription among the Celts to serve in

Rome painfully rejected this proposal, causing the Latium to revolt and become hostile enemies of Rome (Morey, n.d., ch. 10). The result of the Latin war proved to Rome that the cities were not all fit to be apart of the rights of Roman citizenship. Having the great governing intelligence that Rome is known for, they devised a certain order to categorize the different levels of Latium citizenship. At first, many Latium inhabitants became full Roman citizens, with their lands becoming a part of Roman territory. Soon after, came the categories of: Most Latium towns partly incorporated, Military/Latin Colonies who possessed the Latin right, and

By accusing the Army of treason, he lost respect in the population and bad opinions spread around, ruining his power streak. This risk prevented these kinds of people from succumbing to actions that would sabotage their reputation. In addition, McCarthyism allowed these kinds of nasty people, such as McCarthy, to act upon unsightly desires. Therefore, the McCarthy trials encouraged the conflict between

The French government system wasn’t the best for the French citizens, the economic and political issues made the country more divided. The French government did absolutely nothing to help their people, they didn’t realize that the whole country would be affected by their actions. The crisis France had faced could have been prevented, only if the government gave the necessary help and the rights

For example, “ In a city so great and so corrupt Catiline found it a very easy matter to surround himself, as by a bodyguard, with troops of criminals and reprobates of every kind.” This just shows that even though citizens owed Rome loyalty and honesty it was just too corrupt that people had to turn on it. The strength of Rome's relationship with its citizens suffered leaving some of its not so great people to actually side with Catiline only hurting it

Order was tossed away for anarchy and only force was right. The only man capable of becoming the leader needed was Julius Caesar. Julius Caesar initiated the end of the Roman Republic and the beginning of the Roman empire through his leadership, military expertise, and innovations.

Later on, a group of men formed The First and Second Triumvirates taking controlled over Rome which it all ended with the group of men defeating each other. The Romans

He gained new allies and allegiance of numerous plebs and veterans. During his term, Caesar headed to the region Gaul and conquered new lands and in this time made himself fabulously wealthy and popular in the process. While Caesar was out overcoming Gaul, things were going bad back at Rome. Caesar daughter and Pompey wife Julia Caesar passed, breaking the alliance between the two families, leading the Triumvirate into rocky roads. The following year, Crassus was killed in fight in Parthia, which shattered the Triumvirate.

At its pinnacle, the Roman Empire had ruled gargantuan empire, with different classes, histories, and cultures. These differences caused disloyalty within its provinces, rebellion, and eventually, the fall of Rome. From soldiers to taxes, the empire tried to stop these conflicts, but these attempts only increased tensions if anything, and soon enough, the cracks in the wall that is Rome became too deep to be fixed, and the Roman empire fell. Showing, Rome divided itself with mistreatment more than it ever united with wealth. One way in which Rome was divided is the distrust towards Rome the provinces the empire had conquered held.

Decisions: Like Dust in the Wind Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar gives a dramatic account of the plot to assassinate Caesar, how this plot was affected by governing views, and ultimately the means by which it shaped the end products themselves. These political affairs specifically had to deal with the Roman people or the “mob.” How did the mob affect the activities of the higher ups?