The purpose to call the Constitutional Convention, at first, was to revise the Articles of Confederation. However, the framers later decided to create an entirely new government. This was introduced to the nation though the Preamble. The Preamble showed how the government takes authority from the people rather than the states. The Preamble also highlights a major difference between the Constitution and the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution having a more stronger central government. Also, the Constitution gives the states less power, while the Articles of Confederation gives too much power to the states. The Great Compromise takes ideas from the New Jersey Plan and the Virginia Plan, making both the large and smaller states happy. …show more content…
The North didn’t want slaves to count because slaves couldn’t vote. The South wanted slaves to count because they would get more representatives. However, Congress agreed to a plan called the Three-Fifths Compromise. This made it so that each enslaved persons would be counted as three-fifths of a free person. So, 500 enslaved people would count as 300 free people. This was a gain for the South, in which this got them more seats in the House of Representatives. Although, George Washington wanted slavery to be abolished, as he stated in a letter he wrote to Robert Morris. “I can only say that there is not a man living who wishes more sincerely than I do, to see a plan adopted for the abolition of slavery”. The Three-Fifths Compromise helped preserve slavery in the new Constitution. New new Branches of government can include the Executive Branch, the Legislative Branch, and the Judicial Branch. The Executive Branch includes the President and the Vice President. Their role is to enforce laws. The Legislative Branch includes Congress, the Senate, and the House of Representatives. Their role is to create laws. The Judicial Branch includes the Supreme Court and other federal courts. Their role is to interpret laws. The purpose of having these three branches is so that it doesn’t give one person all the power of the …show more content…
Federalists, those who were in favor of a strong federal government, were in debates with Anti-Federalists, those who opposed the ideas of the Constitution. They believed the Constitution weakened the states too much, had no Bill of Rights, and thought the President could easily become a king. Delaware was the first state to ratify, with Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, and Connecticut quickly following. Massachusetts ratified, but still had a strong opposition, and only a major campaign by Constitution supporters won the ratification of the state. Maryland and South Carolina had ratified, which made 8 state ratification. Federalists were afraid that that Virginia, a large and powerful state, might reject the pact, then New York and the other remaining states might do so as well. However in June, 1788, while Virginia was still in debating, New Hampshire became the ninth state to ratify, which could allow for the Constitution to go into effect. In time, New York and North Carolina followed. Rhode Island was the last state to ratify in May, 1790. On July 4th, 1788, Philadelphia celebrated the ratification of the Constitution. The creation of the bIll of Rights were met in 1789. One of the ten amendments is the Quartering of Troops. “No soldier shall, in time of peace, be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner; nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law”. This amendment was made
In May 25, 1787, a convention was called in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to express the purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation. However, the intention from many delegates was to draft a new constitution; create a new government rather than fix the existing one. Rhode Island was the only one of the 13 original states to refuse to send delegates to the Constitutional Convention. At the Convention, the first issues they had to address was the representation in Congress.
The United States Constitution was created to define the powers and limitations of the government. It replaced the Articles of the Confederation, and was ratified by all 13 states in 1787 (American Government, n.d.). The ratification of the Constitution was not without opposition, and the government was split into two groups: federalists, and anti-federalists. The federalist group believed that a national governing body, ruled by the elite class was necessary. Antifederalists, on the other hand, believed that state governments should have more say, and that the government should be run by ordinary people (American Government, n.d.).
Although, there was one thing standing in the way, the Anti-Federalists. The Anti-Federalists were people who did not support the Constitution and were against ratifying it. The first states to ratify the Constitution was Delaware, than Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, and Connecticut followed. Massachusetts opposed the idea of the Constitution, but feared if they didn’t ratify they wouldn’t be in the union. Shortly after Maryland, South Carolina and New Hampshire followed.
The Three-Fifths Compromise is between the North and the South. The issue they were arguing over is whether a slave should be counted as a part of the state’s population, which determines how many representatives the state can select. The North had a population mostly that was comprise of white man. They believed that slaves shouldn’t be counted as a person since they were not citizens and didn’t have the rights to vote. However, the South disagreed because the majority of their population was slaves.
The focus was on how the individual liberty could be permanently secured and preserved. Articles of Confederation and The Constitution, both have some similarities, but they differ more than they do resemble one another. The most common aspect of each other, is that, they were established
At the Constitutional Convention, our founding fathers met to reconstruct the Articles of Confederation, not knowing that they would create the United States Constitution, an entire new format of government. They wanted to create a government that was powerful yet restricted in certain ways, in order to create equal representation for all people. Three main compromises were made at the Constitutional Convention. These compromises were The Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise, and the addition of the Bill of Rights.
The Articles of Confederation was written when the United States was a fairly new country, and from the people wanting to create a different government from the king of England. Although this document respected individual rights, it was too loose of a document that could drive the country to success. After revising what they had created, the founding father of the us the created the us constitution. It was more strict, but still valued peoples rights.
One of the compromises made in the Constitutional Convention is the three-fifths compromise. In this compromise, the southerners wanted to add slaves to the population of the state they lived in. If slaves were included in their state’s population, that state would be able to add more representatives in the House of Representatives. Northerners did not agree with that statement because slaves did not have the right to vote. After the delegates compromised, they agreed that only three-fifths of the slave’s population would be counted into the state’s population.
The branches in the United States government are executive, legislative and judicial. All of these branched function together and are part of the bureaucracy of the United States. When comparing all branches an easy way to look at them is an executive is the law, essentially the president. Whereas legislature is where laws are being made, or denied. Lastly the judicial branch is the supreme court.
The Presidents role in the executive branch is to implement new laws that are passed and enforce them. He or she is given the power to decide whether or not to sign a law that is being attempted to pass or veto it and decline. The Judicial branch includes the Supreme Court and district courts. Their job includes deciding if a law is unconstitutional therefore they get to allow whether a law will be passed or not.
Articles of Confederation vs. U.S. Constitution The Articles of the Confederation and the U.S. Constitution are two articles that where written and accepted by the United States as a foundation for their new government. They are both very important documents that have similarities and differences. Some of the main things the Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution have in common is that they addressed the needs of its constituencies.
To analyze the both sides of the articles, ¨The Articles of Confederation¨ and ¨The U.S. Constitution¨. They have many similarities and differences within the two. The U.S. Constitution was adopted in September 1787. The Articles of Confederation was adopted on November 15, 1777. The similarities between the two is that they both have a Congress that can make laws, as it says in ¨The Constitution of the United States of America¨ in article 1 it states ¨All making powers are given to a Congress¨.
They hoped to create a better government. The Constitution replaced the Article of Confederation permanently in March 4, 1789. The Constitution created checks and balances between the three branches. It also, established the Bill of Rights, and the first ten amendments of the constitution. The Constitution had to be ratified by at least nine states out of thirteen.
We all know that American is the gradated country in the would and we also agree that there were numerous contrasts between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution. However, the Articles of confederation were affirmed by congress on 1777, but their formal adoption was not achieved until 1781. It was an unassuming endeavor by another nation to unite itself and structure a national government. The Articles set up a Confederation that gave the majority of the ability to the states. Numerous issues emerged thus another Constitution was composed in 1787 in independence Hall.
As reported by many history books, the Constitution required the approval of 9 out of 13 states to win ratification. The Federalists where the group that favored ratification. Mostly the Federalist were wealthy people. Many Americans who were not wealthy supported the Constitution was because they believed that the United States needed a new and stronger national government.