Constitutional Convention Pros And Cons

572 Words3 Pages

The Constitutional Convention took place from May 25th to September 17th, 1787, in the state of Pennsylvania. The Convention was created to revise the Articles of Confederation, and to create a new government. There were many disputes that presented themselves during the Convention, the major arguments being: Federalist vs. Anti-Federalists, Large State vs. Small State, Slavery, and One vs. Multiple Leaders. One debate was versus the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The Federalists supported the constitution, and wanted more power to the central government. The Federalists pushed for the constitution because it would give them more power, mainly because they were the government officials, in the central government. Opposed to the constitution were the Anti-Federalists, who wanted the Bill Of Rights not the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists believed the Senate would be too powerful and they (the others/ Anti-Federalists) would be oppressed. The Anti-Federalists wanted the same power as the Federalists, and those in the government. The resolution to this argument was putting the Bill of Rights into …show more content…

Small States. The Larger States (Virginia Plan) believed that due to their larger population size they should have more representation in government. Having representatives based on population size means that the larger states would have more votes and say in the government. Where as the smaller states wanted equal representation for every state, instead of based on population size. This is because they wouldn’t be getting as much say in the laws passed and other government happenings, just because their population size is smaller. The resolution was to have Two Houses: Senate and Representatives. The senate was a good compromise for the smaller states, because it gave everyone equal representatives. The representatives worked for the larger states because for every 30,000 people they get another

Open Document