Constitutional Convention Pros And Cons
Madeline Murga Professor Manny Ontiveros Political Science 180 13 April 2017 The Constitutional Convention In May 14, 1787 The Philadelphia Convention took place in the State House which is now the Independence Hall today. Several meetings took place during the summer to discuss ways they could improve the Articles of Confederation. One of the main arguments they had was they wanted to build a new government that would meet their expectations. There was also a lot of delegates whom didn’t show up and only 12 out of 13 states showed. Rhode Island was one of the states who didn’t send any delegates to the meetings. The three proposals which were debated at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia were the Virginia Plan, New Jersey Plan, and the Great Compromise. The Virginia Plan was written by James Maddison but was presented by Edmund Randolph. It was known as a large state and what this plan proposed was having a strong central government that could collect tax and make stricter laws. Which was made up of three separate branches. The legislative, executive, and judicial. The legislative was the most powerful and would be bicameral which was based on population. This large state thought they …show more content…
What they proposed was to have the same level of power as the larger states. The New Jersey plan was created because of the Virginia Plan had more power and New Jersey Plan would have less say in the government. The more people the state had, the more representatives it would have in the legislature. They wanted equal representation and also wanted a unicameral legislature of only one house. Similar to The Virginia Plan they wanted to collect taxes and control commerce. The New Jersey Plan was a multi person Executive Branch chosen by Congress. They had one Supreme Court which was establish by the Executive Branch. Which it wasn’t much different by the Articles of
The Three-Fifths Of The Virginia Plan At The Constitutional Convention
433 Words | 2 Pages(2) The creation of an unspecified national executive, elected by the legislature. (3) The creation of a national judiciary, appointed by the legislature" (Bardes, Shelley, Schmidt 41). Moreover, the New Jersey differs from the Virginia Plan in that it was "simply an amendment of the Articles of Confederation [and] its only notable features was its reference to the supremacy doctrine, which was later included in the Constitution" (Bardes, Shelley, Schmidt 42). Despite this difference both plans are important as they helped reach an
Compare And Contrast The Virginia Plan Vs New Jersey Plan
412 Words | 2 PagesThe Virginia Plan, favored the size and population of bigger states. The differences from the New Jersey Plan were that the legislative branch would be split into to parts, a Upper and Lower house. The Upper
Compare And Contrast Virginia And New Jersey Plan
1038 Words | 5 PagesStudent’s name Professor’s name Course number Date The Virginia and New Jersey plans 1 The Virginia plan had various characteristics as proposed by Mr Randolph. He suggested in accordance to the wishes of the committee that the national government should be created and that it should consist of a supreme legislative, Executive and Judiciary. According to Mr. Patterson in the Virginia plan which he drew from Mr. Randolph’s propositions, proposed that revision of the articles of confederations was paramount in order to render federal constitution adequacy to the demands of both government and the union in preservation.
Pros And Cons Of The Northwest Ordinance Of 1787
616 Words | 3 PagesConstitutional Convention(1787)- Twelve states participated in the Constitutional Convention held in Philadelphia the summer of 1787. The first thing accomplished at the Convention was the election of George Washington as Convention president. The delegates agreed upon a structure for their government consisting of a Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Branch. The next topic tackled was how would the states be represented with the smaller states on one side of the argument and the larger states on the other side. This argument led James Madison to propose the Virginia Plan.
Compare And Contrast The Virginia Plan
593 Words | 3 PagesThe Virginia plan was favored by the large states because it was based on the population in each state because that would mean the more power they would have in each branch. The Virginia plan was mainly based on population for larger states. Which meant Virginia got more representation than the New Jersey plan. “His proposal for a federal power to override state laws never gained any traction. And his insistence that both branches of the legislature be based on population was
Compare And Contrast The Virginians And The Confederation Government
728 Words | 3 PagesMany Americans grew upset with the Confederation government. So Alexander Hamilton a lawyer and General’s Aid to George Washington decided to change the Articles of the Confederation. He called on the National Convention to overhaul the document. He requested that Congress call upon all of the states to attend a gathering in Philadelphia. George Washington was the first to arrive in Philadelphia giving the large amounts of creditability for the meeting bringing 55 men from all of the states.
Constitutional Convention Dbq
297 Words | 2 PagesIn May 25, 1787, a convention was called in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to express the purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation. However, the intention from many delegates was to draft a new constitution; create a new government rather than fix the existing one. Rhode Island was the only one of the 13 original states to refuse to send delegates to the Constitutional Convention. At the Convention, the first issues they had to address was the representation in Congress.
Summary Of Miracle At Philadelphia
864 Words | 4 PagesThe convention was held in Philadelphia in 1787, during which 12 out of the 13 states sent delegates as representatives. There, these delegates constructed what would be the United States Constitution. Miracle at Philadelphia is a book written by Catherine Drinker Bowden’s telling of the First Constitutional Convention. The convention was held in Philadelphia in 1787, during which 12 out of the 13 states sent delegates as representatives. There, these delegates constructed what would be the United States Constitution.
How Did The Articles Of Confederation Change Under The Ratification Of The Constitution
914 Words | 4 PagesCharles Pinckney of South Carolina solicited whether defenders from the arrangement "intended to nullify the State Governments through and through." On June 14, a contending plan, called the "New Jersey Plan," was displayed by designate William Paterson of New Jersey. The New Jersey Plan kept government controls rather restricted and made no new Congress. Rather, the arrangement extended a portion of the forces at that point held by the Continental Congress. Paterson made ugly the resolved restriction of representatives from huge numbers of the littler states to any new arrangement that would deny them of equivalent voting power ("rise to suffrage") in the authoritative
Pros And Cons Of The Us Constitution
1626 Words | 7 PagesThe delegates unanimously agreed to debate the proposal called the Virginia Plan, after reading it they almost immediately rejected the idea of amending The Articles of Confederation, but instead they decided to use it and create a whole entirely new Constitution (The Challenge of Democracy 60). This is a big contributor to one of the main reasons why the Constitution is
An Essay On The Virginia Plan
499 Words | 2 PagesLeading up to the convention, each state was independent and governed itself. Influential people such as, James Madison did not believe this was the best way to govern. Therefore, Madison wanted to combine the states and place them under one national government. By doing so, the government is now more powerful than the states. On the other hand, the New Jersey Plan wanted to allow the states to remain independent, but have a national government for large issues (SAS Curriculum Pathways).
Essay On The Great Compromise
298 Words | 2 PagesThe plan proposed by Virginia otherwise known as the “large-state plan.” Which proposed “a bicameral legislature, in which the lower house would be elected proportionately and the upper house would be selected from a list of nominees sent from the state legislatures on the basis of equal representation for the states. ”(add footnote) As the smaller states feared that this plan would lose a voice in the federal government if they continued with the Virginia plan, they opposed this plan and came up with one for themselves which would be known as the “small-state plan.” The small-state plan would propose “a unicameral Congress, with equal representation for each state, with all the powers of the Confederation Congress.
What Are The Pros And Cons Of The Electoral College
1858 Words | 8 PagesThey had to consider the problems of the populations of certain states. For instance, there was a plan called the Virginia Plan. The Virginia Plan proposed to have a bicameral legislative plan. This did not work because it gave big states an advantage because of the representatives in Congress that were based on population. There was also a plan proposed by New Jersey which let each state have one vote in congress.
The Three Compromises Made In The Constitutional Convention
1593 Words | 7 PagesObviously, smaller states were not pleased with that plan. They thought that larger states could easily overrule them in congress. So William Paterson created a plan called the New Jersey Plan. It as well had the same three branches but, the plan provided legislators to have only one house. Each state would only one vote in the legislator, regardless of the population.
Virginia Plan Vs New Jersey Plan Essay
537 Words | 3 PagesIn the creating of the US Constitution, the creators hit many roadblocks. It was difficult for the state delegates to decide on much, especially because they were biased and in favor of their own states. The New Jersey Plan and the Virginia Plan were two examples of the disagreement of representation within the states in the legislative branch. The New Jersey Plan was in favor of equal representation throughout the states. The Virginia Plan was in favor of population representation, meaning the larger states would have more representation than the smaller states.
More about Constitutional Convention Pros And Cons
The Three-Fifths Of The Virginia Plan At The Constitutional Convention
433 Words | 2 PagesCompare And Contrast The Virginia Plan Vs New Jersey Plan
412 Words | 2 PagesCompare And Contrast Virginia And New Jersey Plan
1038 Words | 5 PagesPros And Cons Of The Northwest Ordinance Of 1787
616 Words | 3 PagesCompare And Contrast The Virginia Plan
593 Words | 3 PagesCompare And Contrast The Virginians And The Confederation Government
728 Words | 3 PagesConstitutional Convention Dbq
297 Words | 2 PagesSummary Of Miracle At Philadelphia
864 Words | 4 PagesHow Did The Articles Of Confederation Change Under The Ratification Of The Constitution
914 Words | 4 PagesPros And Cons Of The Us Constitution
1626 Words | 7 PagesAn Essay On The Virginia Plan
499 Words | 2 PagesEssay On The Great Compromise
298 Words | 2 PagesWhat Are The Pros And Cons Of The Electoral College
1858 Words | 8 PagesThe Three Compromises Made In The Constitutional Convention
1593 Words | 7 PagesVirginia Plan Vs New Jersey Plan Essay
537 Words | 3 Pages