Abstract
This paper attempts to indentify situations where consumer sovereignty cannot be realised. It employs the theory of the inability of a market economy to inhibit the rise of market forms with imperfect competition; to make a case against the claim that free markets can guarantee consumer sovereignty. It further highlights the inability of markets to guarantee private property rights as a cause for failure of free markets to guarantee the sovereignty of the consumer. The paper recommends a similar treatment of producers (like consumers), in order to construct a counter-intuitive model of revealed preference of the firm to understand a firm’s discretionary powers; this might help us in understanding how one can guarantee greater consumer
…show more content…
As per the situation described above, this paper attempts to answer the following questions: Does a free market economy preserve consumer sovereignty?
If not, how do the inefficiencies of a free market impede the process of realisation of consumer sovereignty in the economy?
The author hypothesises that free markets have imperfections which can result in the loss of sovereignty enjoyed by consumers. Market imperfections cause market failure. In this paper, a market fails when the allocation of resources in not efficient. We use the concept of pareto efficiency i.e. an allocation is not pareto optimal or efficient, if it is possible to make an individual better off without making anybody else worse off (Varian). We analyse this using two types of market failures-
1. Monopolistic competition: To analyse supply side
…show more content…
In this essay, the author stressed upon undesirable effects that result when individual take decisions keeping their self-interest in mind.
CASE STUDY
Ithaca and Geneva, two cities in the county of Tompkins, New York, USA were first connected by rail roads in the year1870; and several other railway lines were also constructed, emanating out of Ithaca. The rail building exercise continued for years to come, with major business being carried out through this network. The traffic touched its peak in the early 1900s.
However, by 1959, these services had to be discontinued completely on account of losses worth $5million dollars being incurred. The cause of this rapid descent of the once glorious service was the loss in passenger travel. People switched to other means of transportation in the form of motor vehicles and airplanes to travel to and from Ithaca when the weather was good. The inhabitants turned to the railway network only when the weather was unfavourable for road and air travel. This led to massive fall in revenues for the railway network service operators. Ultimately, the rail service had to be discontinued. The effect of this disruption was felt by the travellers when motorways and airways became
With increased transportation a domino effect seemed to take place in the country. Increased transportation led to a new market, which in turn led to changes in the democratic system that incorporated the little guy. America was beginning to start a fast paced way of life that left people behind if they did not
The economic expansion between 1815 and 1860 was reflected in the changes of American culture. The progressions were most apparent in the northern states, where the joined impacts of the Transportation Revolution, urbanization, and the ascent of assembling were definitely felt. The Transportation Revolution was a period of rapid growth, in the speed and convenience of travel, because of new methods of transportation. The Transportation Revolution had an effect on the United States by making traveling faster, the country more confident, and reduced shipping time and costs. Before 1815 most farmers in the South and the North strained to accomplish a “competence,” which implied enough substance to sustain their family and a little surplus to
Introduction: While freedom as a concept feels fairly intuitive, nuances in interpretation can change the basis of an argument. John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government and Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America do not define liberty in precisely the same way, which in turn guides two different visions in how a government should function. When examining a core concept in an argument, it is important to inquire to whether its treatment is adequate. Is either definition of liberty sufficient, and does either author’s envisioned government adequately address liberty in that system? This paper will argue that Locke’s definition of liberty remains in the literal sphere while Tocqueville’s is more conceptual, but neither Locke’s nor Tocqueville’s
The Market Revolution in the United States originated in the South and then in the north and was a big change in the system of how the laborers worked. The common trade started to become outdated due to the new discoveries of transportation. The North began to gain a more powerful economy as a result of the Market Revolution. The Market Revolution changed farming to become more large-scale farming with cash. Immigration and the growing cities was a result of the Market Revolution.
Freedom and property both ensure the right to privacy, specifically the right to privately own property. During the revolution, many leaders were keen that two political ideologies (republican and liberal) could initiate a commitment to a constitutional government, freedom of speech and religion as well as the restrain of the arbitrary power. Both ideologies emphasized “the security of property as a foundation of freedom”. Many publishers argued that the ownership of private property was a necessary foundation of liberty. Dependency was inevitable if one did not have private ownership; “men without property would inevitably fall under the immediate domination of others” Those who were dependent would ultimately lack will which “threaten the general liberty”.
Statistics show that today there are over 1.7 billion members of the “consumer class”- half of them being in the developing world (2011, the World Watch Institute). Being part of the consumer class myself, I believe it is crucial to dispense a great deal of money on goods and services to improve the economy here in Canada. Does this mean I’m considered to be a consumer as a result of my views on world consumption? Yes, I fit into the category of a consumer due to the fact that I’m part of the endless cycle of supply and demand. From the moment I leave my house and walk the two minutes to the bus stop I’m already thinking about what I’m going to buy.
During the Gilded Age, there was rapid economic growth in the United States. Some may disagree that transportation did not spark economic growth, because technology couldn’t keep up with the growth of the nation, and there was the creation of monopolies. However, transportation developments led to an increase in trade and production rates, urbanization, and social changes that all positively affected the economy . Therefore, the expansion of transportation developments was key to the growth of the economy between the years 1860-1900. At the beginning of the nineteenth century, bodies of water were the primary mode to travel and trade.
Liberalism sees the market as a major part of civil society. It claims that people should be able freely to exchange goods of their labor with fellow members of society. Moreover, classical liberalism suggests that for society to remain functional, it must be democratic. Liberalism fears that the granting of power opens the door to corruption and the abuse of those powers. There are certain difficulties and challenges in classical liberalism.
While some Americans blame the government for it being undemocratic, the elected officials have provided us with evidence that America is undemocratic. An ideal democracy is how the government puts the people’s interest before the businesses interest. In Lindblom’s story “The Market as Prison”, it introduces a mechanism called the automatic punishing recoil mechanism (APRM). This provides businesses to have a privileged position in society.
Secondly*, governments stress the importance of free will and self expression (such as the first amendment in the Constitution), yet* they are frequently the ones who take it away from citizens, resulting in negative government control. An example of this is shown in The Giver by Lois Lowry. The government, in the book, created “Sameness,” which made everything the same: color, climate, population, gender, houses, and so on. This took away self expression because the people weren’t allowed to make choices for themselves, but they had the choices made for them. For instance*, they could not wake up in the morning and choose between a blue shirt or a red shirt, because Sameness made every color the exact same.
According to Varul (2008) the notion of ‘ethical consumerism’ seems to be a contradiction in terms, since market and morality are commonly viewed as stark opposites with morality being sought in the contestation of certain goods’ commodity status and in the blocking of certain exchanges. What is new in the phenomenon of market society, a phenomenon that has been observed over the last 30 years, is the emergence of consumption as a criterion for the quality of life and as a sign of the demand for it. Moreover, society has become in our time a society that governs and evaluates its members, including the ability to consume. Without legislation regulating the market, people’s choices will be
This chapter has been divided into five segments by Cavanaugh that consists out of “when is a market free?’ , ‘Augustine on freedom and desire”, “libido dominandi”, “judging when a market is free” and “conclusion”. It touches on the concept of human liberty that is found in the theoretical model of the free market. Cavanaugh gives us an understanding about the free market economics of economist Milton Friedman and Catholic writer Michael Novak. Goods and objects are endowed with subjective value and the free market does not differentiate good or bad desires, nor does it inherently promote virtuous action or good stewardship because it is inherently value neutral.
Regulations that the government implement, licensing for example, increases the barrier of entry into the market and decreases ways for the traders to gratify consumer demand. This case is prevalent in the monopoly market. The market is sometimes best to decide how much and what to produce since it has better information and knowledge of the consumers compared to the government. Economic decisions may also not be competent when the government is motivated by political power rather than economic imperatives. Sometimes, economic policies are designed to retain power rather than to ensure maximum efficiency in the economy.
Government Government is a system of social control under which the right to make laws, and the right to enforce them, is given to a particular group in society. Government power can be held by one individual, a few, or a majority. Government come in different forms. The basic law determining the form of government is called the constitution and may be written, as in the United States, or largely unwritten, as in Great Britain.
1.0 INTRODUCTION In an economy, there exists different market structures to accommodate different industries and firms. This study will be made to understand in further depth the market power of different market structures, and in particular an example of using case studies of agricultural sector of the French markets to explain how an ideal perfectly competitive market works. This will then be further strengthened with several references linked to the case study. 1.1 Monopoly market