Contextual criticism is used in text to gain a better understanding, along with more knowledge of the text. In “Oedipus the King” by Sophocles and “The Night Face up” by Julio Cortazar. Criticizing these texts contextual for their content will help the reader have intelligent and knowledgeable interpretation of the stories. Using historical events, life experience and looking at the dominant culture we can find the context of certain passages enhances and creates a more accurate reading experience. This validates that contextual criticism is vital to a accurate and more intelligent interpretation of a text. In both of these stories using the historical knowledge can help grasp a more accurate interpretation. Oedipus talking to Jocasta “On …show more content…
This can also give a perspective to help the reader understand the bias and opinions that the author might have had. This will in turn give the reader themselves a new perspective on how to interpret the text. This occurs in “The Night Face Up” when the main character is in his dreams and thinking to himself “And it was all so natural, he had to run from the Aztecs who had set out on their manhunt,”(Cortazar,69). The relevance of the author's personal life experience is that Julio Cortazar lived majority of his life in Bueno Aires Argentina. So from the basic perspective of analysis we see that Cortazar can express how Aztec rituals often included human sacrifices and hunting. But what we learn when looking at out authors past experience is that he grew up in Argentina a country which had their own indigenous and native people. As a person who grew up an lived most of their life in Argentina he was able to use his knowledge of how important the culture and traditions of his countries traditions. This allows him to use the knowledge of one civilization to compare and be able to portray the same kind of support and traditional lifestyle that his culture contains. This then as a reader allows for a very accurate representation of what the main character is going through. This allows the reader to understand that the character truly is in utter fear of the …show more content…
Using characteristics of the authors themselves and their stories looking at historical events, life experience and the dominant culture we can receive a more accurate understanding of these texts. The reader will only gain new and diffrent unique insights from using contextual criticism while analyzing passages of these texts. After analyzing the context of the texts it will give any reader the most accurate and genuine interpretation of the story and truly allow them to experience the story in another
When Hernando Cortes arrived in the New world he was greeted by a totally alien and unfamiliar culture. The Aztec people of Mesoamerica had similar infrastructure to Cortes’s native Spain, but the culture of the Aztecs was shocking to some of the Spanish who first encountered it. The Aztecs also had resources valuable to the Spanish. This difference in culture is what allowed the Spaniards to rationalize their decision to annihilate the Aztecs in order to gain access to their resources. The Spanish had just retaken the Iberian peninsula as part of the reconquista, and they had gained a strong sense of nationalism as part of that conquest (Gibbs).
For the meaningful coincidence,I remember in the book page 32 to 33, there is a paragraph. When Kafka meets Sakura on the bus, both of them agree that "even chance meetings . . . are the results of karma" and we know the things in life are fated by our previous lives, even in the smallest events there's no such thing as coincidence. So far as i know in this book, it’s talk about a 15 year old boy who ran away from home escaped a terrible to the prediction of the Oedipus complex, and maki, aging and illiterate idiot who never fully recover from the pain of the war.
The field is freshly raked, the sun is blaring in, the game is beginning, but before she is ready, the ball is hit. With the spot light on her, she quickly stumbles over her feet and misses the ball. “Stupid rock” she mumbles under her breath. Her parents protect her with words like “good job” then she proceeds to smile. Ignorance is bliss, for some.
He also shows how Cabeza de Vaca's experiences challenged many of the assumptions that the Spanish had about the native peoples they encountered, and how his observations would contribute to a better understanding of the native cultures of the
New criticism is a literary theory that goes against the Historicism and Autobiography theory. This theory allows the reader to interpret the text that is given to them. It only focuses on the text instead of the author’s biography, the historical setting, or any outside sources. It also focuses on the elements in the text, such as characters, plot, setting, symbols, etc. It allows the reader to create their interpretation without any outside sources to influence their thoughts.
The use of rhetorical appeal in Oedipus the Colonus is prominent, as it paves the way for the plot of the story. In this portion of the play Oedipus tries to appeal to the audience’s emotions by forcing them to empathize with his past horrors and misfortunes. Oedipus states” I have suffered terribly, Theseus, wrongs on wrongs, no end”(ll. 670-671). Thus, evoking sadness and extreme grief those reading or watching the play.
The world of literature offers many different works; some may offer similarities while there are differences between others. There are more similarities than differences between Odysseus and Oedipus. Two great examples of literature is the tragic play “Oedipus the King”, written by Sophocles and “The Odyssey”, an epic poem written by Homer who were both Greek poets. Both poets’ work shows similar examples of life altering changes that were ultimately controlled by the Greek gods.
Nearly everything Oedipus says reveals his lack of knowledge. Oedipus says, “Whoever murdered him may also wish to punish me” (139-140). In this one phrase, Oedipus shows the audience that he does not know who killed the king, for he would not come to punish himself. He says he will search out the answers “as if for my own father” (329), when ironically that is precisely what he is doing. When talking about the fate of the searched-for murderer, Oedipus says it will not be cruel.
People who are generally cocky and full of themselve tend to have a very horrible death and story that leads up to it. Oedipus is the king of Thebes, who can be full of himself sometimes, but it doesn't affect him in life. He has saved his city before by solving the riddle of the sphinx and he is trying to save it once again by finding out who killed the old king of Thebes, Laius. He has a way of finding out who killed him, but it to only lead to his tragic downfall. Many people think that it was hubris that caused his death but I just don't think that hubris is a logical explanation.
In the playwright “Oedipus the King”, by Sophocles, the protagonist Oedipus has learned that his prophecy is destined for him to marry his mother Jocasta
The essay through a literary analysis and a close reading of the text ought to bring out this
SHUBH MITTAL IBDP XII B D-BLOCK Paper 2 Essay Context: Historical, Political, Economic, Cultural, or Social can have an influence on the way literary works are written or received. Discuss with reference to two literary works that you have studied. Writer’s use of context acts as a driving force enabling and shaping literature.
From everyday experience, readers know how things usually happen and how people react. A distortion of action or an understatement of effect gets a special response from readers, because they consider these changes improbable or the unexpected. The reader has to be alert to the actions of character because actions are the author’s way of showing, not telling, what the characters are like Appearance may be taken as a due to the nature of a character if the author leads the reader to attaché significance to it. Literary analysis is not pure description or a summary of the action, although it may include these elements.
Oedipus the King is one of the most ironic plays ever written. Sophocles, the author, is a famous philosopher of the ancient times The Play is about Oedipus, the king of Thebes, who kills his father and marries his mother. An oracle warned Laius, the king of Thebes prior to Oedipus, that his son would murder him. Accordingly, when his wife, Jocasta, had a son, he exposed the baby by first pinning his ankles together. The infant, who was adopted by King Polybus of Corinth and his wife was then brought up as their very own.
By far the most fascinating aspect of reading classic novels is the life lessons we can grow from just reading a book that is decades old. If we didn’t read and study texts from the past, and only looked to the best seller list, how would we know of our evolution? Understanding a story through the experiences of a character, decades old, enables us to feel what it could have been like and help us consider the impact of events, significant or otherwise, on ordinary people. Gaining a broad view of society, and through the eyes of another, fosters understanding, tolerance and empathy and the value of these capacities cannot be under-estimated in today’s world. For example, the gothic novel “Frankenstein” expresses the theme of humanity through curiosity and mistakes.