Question 2)
According to the common law legal system, a contract is an agreement enforceable by law between two or more parties, with each of the parties having the intention to create certain legal relationships between or among them. (Wex, 2008) There are four elements that makes up a valid contract, mainly Offer, Acceptance, Considerations and Intention to create legal relationships. In the case where any one of the four elements is not present, the contract or agreement would not be a valid one.
Offer is an expression of willingness to agree on certain terms and it can be done in various forms such as in writing, orally or by conduct. An offer must be concise. The offeree’s understanding of the offeror’s offer should be the same, according
…show more content…
Both of their considerations are executory. In other words, there is a valid contract between them but consideration has not been executed yet. Hence, they both have existing legal relationship between them.
Secondly, Promissory Estoppel requires to have some intention to make amendments to an existing contract. However, there is no evidence showing that there is another promise take place after the contract is formed. The considerations remained as it is.
Next, Peter relied on the promise and changes his position. He told his customers and suppliers that business has been sold and should have all their business deals with ZYCO immediately. If Peter did not rely on the promise that John has given him about buying over ASBIT, he would not have told his business partners this piece of information because he will be bring bad reputation to his company and himself if the information is a false one. Peter has no reason to risk that.
Lastly, since Peter has already to certain actions such as informing his business partners that the company is changing owners, it is unfair for him to go back on his words since the information were announced to
As I mentioned earlier not everyone is aware of what The Family and Medical Leave Act is, what the law is for, and how it can be or should be used when they should if the company where they work employs more than 50 people. By law employers are supposed to inform all employees about FMLA. In the case of Jeffrey Angstadt verses Staples Contract and Commercial, Inc. Angstadt was wrongfully fired because he did not know about the FMLA and could not balance his work responsibilities and taking care of his ill wife.
The regulation states, an employee must be restored to a position that is geographically proximate to their previous position. Furthermore, it is an interference of an employee’s right, to which he or she is entitled under FMLA, by failing to restore him or her to an equivalent position upon return to work. 29 C.F.R. § 825.215. In the case of McFadden v. Seagoville State Bank, the employee’s previous job before taking FMLA leave required a seven mile commute one way, which takes ten minutes to drive.
Jim and Laura perform to their commitment of the agreement. For their situation, Stan did not respect his piece of the agreement by not discounting their cash when the choice was not to buy the auto. Stan additionally committed a few errors since he said," the store was intended to be a piece of the agreement to buy the auto". Stan knew he was in an agreement since he let it be known. Stan additionally utilized "signified" since he knew he didn't talk about that part already with Jim and Laura.
The youth is enrolled in school, however, has never attended a day. On 01/17/2014 MA PO met with father who reported that on Saturday, 01/14/2017, Tailina physically assaulted Mr. Roman. Father reported that the minor ran away that day and is nowhere to be found. Tailina ran out of the home when she was informed that Mr. Roman called the Springfield PD and was reporting the assault. Father filed a missing person report on 01/18/2017.
Contacts are base into common law and it consists of three things; offer, acceptance, and consideration. Acceptance is understanding the contacts and the knowledge of it so you know what you are getting yourself into. Consideration a.k.a. Quid pro quo, is basically when both parties gives, its likes you give, I give sort of thing.
Undocumented children are given the right to school. In Article 26 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, it states that education is a human right. (crossing the borders peer) In the year of 1982, this right was opened up to children without legal status in the United States. Denying these rights was deemed unconstitutional; education was opened up to illegal immigrant children.
By saying this, the authors show they have tried to set agreed terms with
Terms which the communications of the parties concur or which are generally put forward in a writing expected by the parties as a last expression of their agreement regarding such terms as are incorporated in that may not be denied by confirmation of any former declaration or of a coexisting oral understanding yet may be clarified or supplemented. (https://www.law.cornell.edu) Additionally, necessities put forward in Section 2-201 must first be fulfilled if the agreement as adjusted is inside of its stipulations. Article II of the Uniform Commercial Code. A case of this segment can be Fairway Mach.
He says “No, no. I have signed it. You have seen me. It is done! You have no need for this” (page 142).
The doctrine was espoused in Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130. It requires of the promisor to honour a unilateral promise he made to the promisee who is not required to pay consideration from in certain circumstances. It was accepted as part of Australian contract law in Walton’s Stores Ltd v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387. Brennan J listed the essential elements of an action for promissory estoppel as below; i. that the plaintiff implied or expected existence of a legal relationship whereby the promisor will not go back on his promise ii.
Peter Appleton and John Proctor are both similar and different in their own way. They both are in similar situations when they are faced with similar moral dilemmas. They both are coming from different time eras so the dilemma for both of them are of course going to be different. In John Proctors case he is facing the dilemma of him and his wife being accused of witchcraft, and with just being accused of witchcraft no one wanted to associate with you in any way. Peter Appleton’s dilemma is that he is a big Hollywood film writer and living the American dream, but things start to go down because he has been accused of communism.
In this negotiation, the Bullard Houses are being sold and the buyer and seller negotiated the terms of a potential sale. In this negotiation, the interests of both parties were incompatible.
What is the exigency? Identify the exigency - the problem - you face at work, which is part of the reason you are writing the proposal. I currently receive a monthly report that includes the number of non-KP members that receive services in the Colorado Region. Prior to Obamacare, between 18-23 percent of the residents in Colorado were uninsured. Currently that percentage is between 8-10 percent, and you would expect the number of un-insured patients that receive treatment at KP would also decrease.
Should the Postal Rule be Abolished? Contract law is a form of the law which focuses on agreements made between two or more parties. Contracts can be made in an informal manner and can also be made formally. Most people would recognise a contract to be a formal written document which states the conditions, warranties and description of an offer being made. However, that is not always the case.
The relational exchange arrangement can be viewed as a method to fix the flaws of formal contract, which undermines trust and thereby encourage the opportunistic behavior. The core of the theory is relational norms which can help build up an effective contract governance, and eventually achieve a better vendor- customer relationship. “Many classifications of norms have been proposed, but no one is regarded as dominant. Heide and John (1992) have proposed that relational norms are a higher order construct consisting of three dimensions: flexibility, information exchange, and solidarity” (Solli-Saether & Gottschalk, 2010, p. 32).