ipl-logo

Contract Law: Notarizing The Video With Charlie Brown

276 Words2 Pages

A contract is a legal enforceable agreement between two or more competent people (pg. 48). A contract can be breached if the people that agreed on or signed it does not follow through with the obligations they agreed to. In the video with Charlie Brown, even though there was a contract, one party did not feel that they were obligated to follow through because it was not notarized. Notarization makes the contract a formal one, but it was considered a simple contract and should have been binding.
I purchased a car and thought that I was doing a regular purchase. I made a down payment and was told my monthly amount. The car salesman and I went over the amount, he took me to talk to the finance department. We haggled a little bit, went over

Show More
Related

  • Essay On Zapatha Vs Dairy Mart

    508 Words  | 3 Pages

    The trial court held for Zapatha. Dairy mart appealed. In Zapatha v Dairy Mart, 381 Mass. 284; N.E. 2d. 1370 there are two issues at hand. 1) Does the unconscionability of an agreement depend on whether at the time of execution the contract provision at issue could result in unfair surprise and was oppressive to the allegedly disadvantaged party; and 2) Whether a merchant seeking to terminate a business agreement must act in good faith by practicing honesty in fact and observing reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing in that trade.

    Read More

  • Est1 Task 4

    865 Words  | 4 Pages

    Jim and Laura perform to their commitment of the agreement. For their situation, Stan did not respect his piece of the agreement by not discounting their cash when the choice was not to buy the auto. Stan additionally committed a few errors since he said," the store was intended to be a piece of the agreement to buy the auto". Stan knew he was in an agreement since he let it be known. Stan additionally utilized "signified" since he knew he didn't talk about that part already with Jim and Laura.

    Read More

  • Cornie V. Arnie Case Study

    236 Words  | 1 Pages

    1. What constitutional rights were violated? How were they violated? Breaking and entering, illegal search, and questioning a suspect without informing him of his rights were the constitutional rights violated in this scenario. Arnie and the officer entered into the suspects home without a warrant or probable cause and they then proceeded to search his house illegal and used the evidence in the house to question him without using informing him of his rights.

    Read More

  • M1 Unit 4

    489 Words  | 2 Pages

    If I enter, the contract could be considered not valid. The party may seem to understand the terms and conditions despite lacking legal capacity. This problem can be overcome by translating the legal binding document into the language the party understands. For example, if the party that does not understand the English language only reads French, the contract can be written both languages and signed. Then, the document can become a legal binding contract.

    Read More

  • Donald Sterling Case

    618 Words  | 3 Pages

    Unlike a normal employment agreement the team member could be held in breach of contract if they chose to leave the team. The team member who were signed under Donald Sterling now reported that they felt threaten by Mr. Sterling, and

    Read More

  • Paul Walker's Lawsuit: The Porsche Case

    324 Words  | 2 Pages

    The wrongful death lawsuit filed by Meadow Walker (Paul Walker's daughter), was responded to by the German automobile manufacturer specializing in high-performance sports car - Porsche. The daughter of the Fast & Furious actor claims that her father would still be alive if the vehicle had proper safety features that would have given him the necessary protection from the tremendous impact of the crash. A representative of Porsche, said in a statement, "We felt sorrow whenever anyone is hurt in a Porsche vehicle, but we believe the authorities' reports in this case clearly recognized that this tragic crash resulted from reckless driving and excessive speed."

    Read More

  • Essay On Sherman Act

    598 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Supreme Court held that an agreement that is “so consistently unreasonable that the question of reasonableness is foreclosed”, would qualify as a per se violation of the Act. Examples of per se violations include group boycotts and concerted refusals to deal. A group boycott is "a refusal to deal or an inducement of others not to deal or to have business relations with tradesmen. " A concerted refusal to deal is "an agreement by two or more persons not to do business with other individuals, or to do business with them only on specified terms."

    Read More

  • Declaration Of Freedom Vs. Fear In The Majestic

    1812 Words  | 8 Pages

    And you know what a contract is? Something that can be renegotiated at any time. It just so happens the House Un-American Activities Committee is renegotiating the contract this time around. Next time it'll be somebody else, but it'll always be somebody.” Fear is an alright thing to have; however, when fear begins to overpower logical thinking, that is when it should be frowned upon.

    Read More

  • Copyright Lawsuit: Kidd Williams Vs. Donald Glover

    706 Words  | 3 Pages

    n 2018, a copyright lawsuit was filed against Donald Glover, also known as Childish Gambino, and his team for allegedly copying the hit song "This Is America" from a track titled "Made in America" by rapper Kidd Wes. The case raised questions about the extent of protection for original works of art, the importance of attribution, and the value of fair use. The controversy began when Kidd Wes accused Donald Glover and his collaborators of stealing the melody, rhythm, and lyrics of "Made in America" for their Grammy-winning single "This Is America."

    Read More

  • Essay On Parol Evidence Rule

    950 Words  | 4 Pages

    This rule is related to parol evidence, as well as extrinsic evidence in relation to the contract. If even a single term to the contract is finalized between the parties and is finally prescribed in a written form, the other evidence (i.e. parol or extrinsic) will be barred. For instance, Aakash agrees to sell a car to Rohan,

    Read More

  • Matthew Hartley's Legal Obligation

    99 Words  | 1 Pages

    In order for job/position of the defendant in relation to plaintiff to be established the defendant must hold a job or position that is in relation to the plaintiff in order for a legal obligation to be established. In this case the defendants Matthew Hartley was operating a motor vehicle in a grossly negligent manner, operating a vehicle under the influence and leaving the scene of a crash and killed the plaintiff, Mollie Mahowald throwing her 20 or 30 feet in the air. Therefore, the defendant does not owe the plaintiff a legal obligations based off the job/position relationship.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Why Artists Should Be In Commercials

    614 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Regardless of what artists may think about this shift in the music industry, there’s no arguing that they need to adapt in order to make money” (Carter 5). Endorsement deals play a big role in a musician’s career. Currently people are debating about whether or not artists should allow advertisers to use their music in promotions. Artists should allow their music to be in commercials because advertising keeps a musician financially stable and helps them reach a wider audience. Generally speaking, allowing corporations to use a musician’s music in advertising keeps artists financially stable.

    Read More

  • Assignment Experiment: Roy Brown Through The Innocence Project

    806 Words  | 4 Pages

    Roy Brown Through the Innocence Project The Innocence Project frees people from jail that were wrongly convicted of a crime. That is what happened to Roy Brown. Through the help of the Innocence Project, he was released from jail. Brown was convicted of a horrific crime that included murder, even though the evidence that was provided was analyzed and presented wrongly.

    Read More

  • Advantages Of The Postal Rule

    1432 Words  | 6 Pages

    Should the Postal Rule be Abolished? Contract law is a form of the law which focuses on agreements made between two or more parties. Contracts can be made in an informal manner and can also be made formally. Most people would recognise a contract to be a formal written document which states the conditions, warranties and description of an offer being made. However, that is not always the case.

    Read More

  • Philadelphia Movie Ethical Issues

    640 Words  | 3 Pages

    Philadelphia, a film released in 1993 starring Tom Hanks and Denzel Washington was one of the first major films to cover controversial sexual health issues in the United States. After the AIDS epidemic in the 1980s, the media feared to exploit the deadly disease and issues concerning sexuality and sexual health were continued to be viewed as taboo. The film aims to depict the current issues (in 1993) dealing with HIV/AIDS, homosexuality and homophobia discrimination and the lack of knowledge and prejudices that accompany those issues. Tom Hanks’s character, Andrew Beckett, is a young and driven attorney that made partner at a high-powered law firm. Beckett conceals his sexual orientation as a homosexual male and his HIV/AIDS status from

    Read More

More about Contract Law: Notarizing The Video With Charlie Brown

Open Document