We all know of movies that have fermented court cases, murders and rapes. But do you know that there a few movies where the actors themselves left the set because they were traumatized to that extent? Honestly, I love controversial movies. I appreciate the courage it takes to make a movie with the prior knowledge that the press is going to line-up in front of your house for all the wrong reasons. These movies, generally, don’t involve any form of manipulation. They put the message across very clearly and bluntly. As a viewer, I like that. Amongst commercial movies which are quickly discarded from our memory after the first watch, it is good to have a movie that will be remembered for a long time. Let’s move on to the bigger question. Why …show more content…
Even people who are uninterested in or afraid of horror watched this movie just to see what the talk is all about.
A Clockwork Orange-
Alex (played by Malcolm McDowell), the protagnist, is a sociopath whose interests include classical music(especially Beethoven), rape, and "ultra-violence". He leads a small gang and the movie shows the crime spree of his thug gang.
Personally, the fact that made the movie so disturbing is the film score. If a rape scene has terrifying background music, the scene will be brutal. The transformation from brutal to disturbing happened when the background score was a track by Beethoven. It gives us a feel that the rapist is enjoying the act and the thought of it is twisted and disturbing.
This movie was not only banned by the Catholic Church and given an X rating but was also banned for 27 years in the UK. The casual rape depicted in the movie had lead to a lot of similar incidents involving rape and murders in the UK. The crimes are horrifying but the protagonists are inexplicably likeable and this is a deadly
…show more content…
There is a scene in the film which shows a 5-year-old boy getting raped by his father. This movie according to the director is a big metaphor about how the Serbian government hypnotises people into doing their bidding.
There are a few movies in this list that I actually like. This clearly isn’t one of them. Many parts of the movie were absolutely senseless. The director conveyed no message and clearly, nobody got the “metaphor.”
Last temptation of Christ- The film depicts the life of Jesus Christ and his struggles against various temptations including lust. This film depicts Christ being tempted by imagining himself engaged in sexual activities.
The name and the summary of the movie suggest enough. It caused uproar amongst the Christian community without doubt. The outrage from the religious community was rampant. A group of French fundamentalist Christians attacked a theatre showing the film in Paris, injuring several moviegoers.
Any other theme of controversy like torture, horror or violence doesn’t cause half as much agitation as religion does. The other themes are disturbing. So, they become a controversy. But when a movie hurts the religious sentiments of someone, the viewers get offended and a controversy is
But the article also shows how Alex Gibeny wanted to get the message across about the reality of what happens in the church to both Tom Cruise and John Travolta. There are scenes that show how these stars are treated and also there is a part where they show that people are being forced to clean dirty bathrooms which shows the difference in what they are showing people and what is happening in
In the 1980’s a victim was linked to a string of murderers in the 1980’s. Lonnie Franklin is mostly known for being a serial killer, the Grim Sleeper. Throughout this documentary deviance is shown, one afternoon a man who worked for Lonnie who thought he was an insurance man received a car from Lonnie and he found splattered blood in the seats. Lonnie told his insurance man to set the car on fire and the man did so because nobody expected Lonnie to do anything that would cause harm and they never told him no. The environment Lonnie lived in influenced him, he lived in a very poor section of town, not many jobs, and bad schools.
222 Race Relations Light Years From Earth argue-value judgements 1. journal notes: 10/11/15 07:37 PM submitted: Well I did enjoy this movie when it came out, and I was as keen as other viewers who saw the connection with the stereotyping. I was glad that the writers allowed for the ending it had. I didn’t want to see Jake become “king” or “priest” and the movie left me wondering when part 2 will be out.
Moreover, Kubrick’s reliance on unconventional camera angles and his cryptic employment of literary and mythic allusions have enriched the layered intricacies of A Clockwork Orange, hence preventing it’s evolution into a “work too didactic to be artistic”.1 Figs 1.7-1.19. A seventeen year old Alexander Delarge exercises violent delinquency along with his “droogs” by indulging in physical and sexual violence. Figs 1.10-1.12 Alex’s love for Beethoven is used against him when he is subjected to the Ludovico reform treatment, the failure of which leads to attempted suicide. In the end, Alex ironically muses, “I was cured after
This film is one of the important movies in America cinema and it was also known as the first modern horror film in the 1960s. Due to many researches this movie was symbolic to the Civil Rights movement and the Vietnam War “Argue that this film can be read as a subversive critique of 1960s American society with most of them interpreting the film as dealing with racism, the Vietnam War, a patriarchal society, and distrust of authorities.” As my personal reference this quote is valid because in the movie Ben Huss (Duane Jones), played by African-American, he is known as main protagonist but the director’s also make Ben the antagonist of this film by not
In their chapter, Developmental Differences in Responses to Horror, Joanne Cantor and Mary Beth Oliver established three categories of fear inducing stimuli and events that are regularly seen in frightening media. They created the three categories after reviewing research on the issues of real life fears and the effects of frightening media on viewers. All three of their categories can be found in this week’s film It Follows. The film focuses on a young woman, Jamie “Jay” Height, and her struggle to end a curse that will claim her life unless she passes it along to another unsuspecting individual through sexual intercourse. Cantor and Oliver’s first category is the frequency of danger and injury.
In the horror film, Young Frankenstein, director Mel Brooks uses several elements of horror to keep the viewer engaged in the movie, as well as to convey varying degrees of fear in an otherwise humorous movie. Within the first five minutes, one of the elements, the unexpected, is employed in the form of an ever-classic jump scare and is repeated several more times throughout. Each of these scenes, often coupled with an equally jarring noise, keep the audience tense and anxious as they never know when a jump scare may occur. The viewers are startled for only a fraction of a second, but that split second still causes their imaginations run wild with dozens of scenarios conditioned into the human mind by previous horror movies.
“Beauty and the Beast” prompted a campaign among Christians to boycott the film after Disney announced that it would feature a “gay moment,” but there are also some Christians who do not think that banning the movie is a good idea. Ahead of the premier of “Beauty and the Beast,” renowned evangelist Franklin Graham took to Facebook to slam the inclusion of a gay moment in the film. He accused Disney of pushing LGBT agenda into the minds of children, The Christian Post relays.
The film’s moral message is about hate crime against the gay community is wrong. But it doesn’t only show that message, the film is also trying to encourage gay people to come out and not be afraid of being what they are and also educate those who do not understand what being gay means. For example, one interview in particular was about a man who slowly came out to be gay. He never came out because he would feel as if people would bash him in disgust. But he changed his opinion and and came out to being gay when he witnessed a group of people giving respects to Matt Shepard by walking behind a parade.
The reason for it being ¨anti-catholic¨ was the Golden Carp possibly giving children a different belief and also for including an atheist character, Florence. ¨Sexually explicit¨ was brought up because the novel includes prostitutes and shows a cow and a bull having sexual intercourse. Another reason for the hatred was for the many cursing the book contains. Antonio´s friends, the boys, curse more than any child should and some adults curse when stressed or in pain.
Lastly, you have people who say “I don’t think the movies are good, therefore media attention is unneeded.” Just because someone doesn’t like a movie, that does not mean the rest of the world can’t enjoy it. That would almost be like saying you saying CNN shouldn’t be allowed on T.V. solely because your mother doesn’t like it. One person’s opinion doesn’t matter, but when you go putting millions of people who liked the movie together, it will tend to gain media’s
Even though the movie was different than the real event, it still delivered the same message of
The people who were watching this film in 1985, experienced what was going on in the movie. They had all sorts of parenting, social, and economic problems, so they knew his work wasn’t just something to be shown off. It had a purpose and the argument in the film was credible. Overall, this movie was a success in appealing to all rhetorical appeals and forming a strong argument for citizens of the
However, even though the film is heavily reliant on multiple components of traditional Greek mythology, it is no way a proper alignment to the themes presented in those myths. Rather, it relies on an increasingly Christian perspective of informing its narrative to the
Gus Van Sant, the director of the movie, chose to include every detail that he possibly could to relate this movie to American Democracy. He strategically included heterosexual and homosexual actors to spark a political debate. The director clearly wanted to make a point about the discrmination against the LGBTQ society. He emphasizes this by having homosexuals march down the streets of San Francisco, destroying city property.