ipl-logo

Copernicus's Argument Analysis

452 Words2 Pages

You threw Copernicus in jail for heresy since you can’t accept that he proved a fairly acceptable thesis to prove that you shouldn’t believe everything that was passed down form generation from generation.What if people were to believe that there 's no god since it’s been brought down from generations ago.Yes,you may have an opinion on something that may seem true to you,but you have to be able to say that you were wrong,and this will prove that your action shall not be tolerated. The Sun is in the middle of the solar system.Copernicus made the discovery of proving Aristotle wrong by proving that the Earth isn’t in the middle of the Earth.To be fair,it seems kind of atrocious but old subjects aren’t the reliable source to believe in.What if people believed that there’s no God since that was information that was passed down.That’s why the people should believe in Copernicus’s theory. …show more content…

People would have the information about the solar system if we believed Aristotle.Imagine having to believe in Aristotle,a person who made claim that is old,for our information that is outdated due to the church not being able to accept the fact that everything said should be believed.Yes,he might of been right once but if someone were to come along and say,”Thou shall not be accepted since thou shall not believe in Aristotle,”that seems pretty atrocious.Everyone needs information that can be reliable from a reliable source instead of accepting everything that’s been said by someone.That’s why Copernicus did nothing

Show More
Related

  • Phyllis Tickle's Analysis

    1749 Words  | 7 Pages

    Answer – Phyllis Tickle borrows an amazing analogy from an Anglican bishop named Mark Dryer to describe an occurrence that happens around every 500 years in the church; in which, the changes of the culture forces the church evaluate beliefs and doctrines (Tickle 152). Specifically, Tickle says, “It is the business of any rummage sale first to remove all of the old treasures that belonged to one’s parents so as to get on with the business of keeping house the new way” (Tickle 535-536). Her point can be seen in the example of the church teaching the earth was flat and the center of the universe, only to find out through Copernicus’ theory; and the later the sailing of Columbus, that the earth is round and not the center of the universe (Tickle

    Read More

  • We Should Abolish Columbus Day

    630 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the book, Inventing the Flat Earth, it says that there were Europeans in Columbus´ time that actually did believe that the earth was not

    Read More

  • The Role Of The Gods In Homer's The Odyssey

    1137 Words  | 5 Pages

    People today look for solid evidence to explain their wonderings about natural phenomena “Those with a magnitude higher than 7.0 -- more than doubled in the first quarter of 2014 compared with the average since 1979” (Yan 2). This shows how we rely on evidence to explain what is happening to the planet. Whereas the Greeks in 700 B.C.E. looked towards religion to find a

    Read More

  • Galileo Trial Summary

    976 Words  | 4 Pages

    Autumn Stern Galileo Trial Summary + Copernicus Write Up In the early 17th century, there was no doubt that the Catholic church held extreme power throughout Europe. They also held to the geocentric theory (all planets, heavenly bodies and the sun revolving around the earth) put forth by Ptolemy and Aristotle because of how neatly it could fit into the current teachings. Unlike this theory, however, Galileo enforced Copernicus’ heliocentric theory with inductive reasoning rather than deductive. Galileo made observations about the moons of Jupiter and their orbit around Jupiter, which he likened to a smaller version of their solar system.

    Read More

  • Dbq Galileo Galilei

    249 Words  | 1 Pages

    Galileo Galilei was an Italian astronomer who disagreed with the Roman Catholic theory of geocentrism. He was not a heretic because he was a Christian and had similar beliefs to the Roman Catholics, but he did not agree with the Church’s theory of the position and movement of Earth in the Solar System. Document A is an excerpt of a letter to Duchess Christina of Tuscany written by Galilei, counter-arguing the heresy claims. In the letter, Galileo wrote, “Can an opinion be heretical and yet have no concern with the salvation of souls?” Although he did not believe in the astronomical theory of the Church, he believed that his scientific thoughts should not interfere with his religious beliefs.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Galileo's Letter To Grand-Duchess Christina '

    456 Words  | 2 Pages

    The second was the Ptolemaic or Earth-centered Universe, were the sun orbits the Earth. Galileo faced much opposition from the Catholic Church, and was repeatedly harassed and condemned by his contemporaries. The letter he wrote to Christina was to clearly state his view of mixing science and religion. He projected himself as a man that was only trying to expose the truth, but he was also trying to

    Read More

  • What Is The Arguments To Kepler´s New Astronomy?

    875 Words  | 4 Pages

    Powerful bishops and believers of the Holy Scripture deny Kepler’s interpretation of the passage in the Bible because they claim that only those with an authority in the Church are allowed to interpret the Bible and exclaim the word of God. The Church believed that Kepler had no authority to personally interpret the Scripture in light of his scientific discoveries. Contemporary objections to Kepler’s interpretation on why the sun centered view was not a dissent against the Scripture based their opinions on the premise that only Church leaders were the only ones able to truly read and understand God’s ideas laid out in the

    Read More

  • Essay On Galileo Heretic

    1415 Words  | 6 Pages

    According to the world history book from Bob Jones University, Galileo was a heretic, when it states “When Galileo published his findings, however, he also came into conflict with the Roman Catholic Church, which tried him for heresy.” I think the textbook was accurate in its belief that Galileo was a heretic because the definition of heresy is a “belief or opinion contrary to orthodox religious doctrine.” Galileo was an iconoclast because his theory that stated the earth revolved around the sun disagreed with the Roman Catholic Church’s belief of a geocentric galaxy. Galileo was opposed by cardinals, the Roman Catholic Church, philosophers, scholars, and, according to the holy Fathers, the Bible itself. Galileo was a heretic because his discoveries

    Read More

  • Nicolaus Copernicus Research Paper

    418 Words  | 2 Pages

    Standing before the Polish Academy of Sciences is a bronze statue of astronomer, Nicolaus Copernicus. In his hand, he holds a compass and armillary sphere, symbols of his Innovation, Experimentation, and ability to change the way we see the world. Having defended Poland from the Teutonic Knights, invented the quantity theory of money (MV=PY), and inventing the revolutionising Heliocentric theory of the universe (before telescopes were invented, there is no doubt that Copernicus’ work and method demonstrates the Spirit of the Renaissance. The Renaissance was a time of discovery, art, and science.

    Read More

  • The Relationship Between The Scientific Revolution And The Enlightenment

    745 Words  | 3 Pages

    Copernicus developed the heliocentric theory which claimed that the earth revolved around the sun. This immediately challenged the authorities who believed the opposite. Galileo furthered Copernicus’ argument and promoted that the Bible, that God

    Read More

  • Noah's Ark Research Paper

    992 Words  | 4 Pages

    Despite the discovery of its location, some people still do not believe

    Read More

  • Why Was Darwin's Theory Wrong

    1189 Words  | 5 Pages

    No one raised suspicions about the truth content of the common religious teachings. Science as it

    Read More

  • Copernicus's On The Revolutions Of The Heavenly Spheres

    433 Words  | 2 Pages

    He is interested in gelling old premises with new ones to be able to get a unique and more profound outcome that way, because he claims that the astronomers cannot bring anything concrete to the table. This proposes that he has better suggestions to offer, perhaps making him more credible. Additionally, once again Copernicus claims how he is aware that he would possibly be, “hooted off the stage,” (Copernicus 2). Affirming that, he re-emphasizes the opposed to his theories. Yet, he turns it around to introduce the fact that what he is doing pertains to the Church doctrine.

    Read More

  • To An Athlete Dying Young Pessimism

    1047 Words  | 5 Pages

    They did the same with Lyell’s theory about the true age of the earth. All of

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: What Is Truth Is Relative?

    1146 Words  | 5 Pages

    Galileo was saying if it is truth than another truth cannot disprove it. Truth is proven, not debatable and can never be disproven. If it is truth than it is a fact and other facts (in this case new discoveries) cannot disprove what is real truth. Even though Galileo we don’t know whether the discoveries or religious beliefs he was arguing are correct the point is the philosophical statement he was making about truth. Once something is known to be truth, it will stay truth and is something to be trusted

    Read More

More about Copernicus's Argument Analysis

Open Document