Initial Thoughts
As I viewed this art, the first thing I see is a mother and her children. The woman who is sitting down has a gold chain and other jewelry and looks as if she is trying to explain to the mother that those items are treasures. The mother is explaining to the woman that her treasures are her children. The woman sitting down must not have any children or she would understand why children are a mother’s greatest treasures.
Aspect(s) of Interest What I admire about this painting is the title, “Cornelia Presenting Her Children as Treasures”. I am a mother and my daughter means the world to me. There’s no amount of money, gold, or diamonds that could replace her. I admire how the artist, Angelica Kauffman, painted in a way to make the message clear to the viewers. She did not put detail into the background and used light and shading to keep the focus on the mother and children. The woman with the gold chains and jewelry has a puzzled looked on her face like she doesn’t not understand how the mother could think her children are worth more than her jewelry.
Historical Context
Angelica Kauffman is an artist from the “Age of Reason”, or the Age of Enlightenment. During this period, knowledge and intelligence was growing with the help of the invention of the Encyclopédie (MindEdge, Inc., 2016).
…show more content…
Cornelia was an influential woman to the Roman women and this painting that Angelica painted shows viewers who Cornelia is, that she is a mother who is devoted to her children. Angelica was famous for painting portraits, but also would paint mythological paintings like the Ancient Greeks and Romans, who painted pictures of the gods. Angelica studied the Ancient Greek and Roman art and used some of the same techniques to create this painting. Cornelia may not be a god, but she was a role model to Roman
These entries hold value as it shows a wealthy woman gaining awareness of the
After reading it, Mr. Notkins’ Artist Statement really opens your eyes as to what the piece is trying to convey and you change the way you thought the piece was assembled. The piece is much more obvious than other famous paintings and Notkins doesn’t seem to care about that. After reading the artist's statement my views and thoughts
Lily has just spotted it in the Boatwright house. She has yet to learn of its significance, to experience its important role in the lives of the Daughters of Mary, and to understand its place in the family history of the Boatwright sisters. Rather, Lily simply yet viscerally reacts to the statue’s material, color, and gesture. Immediately
In the representation, illumination of facial features are created by all the symbols and images that the person is made up of because it exemplifies the morals and characteristics of the person, but when the drawings and symbols are peeled away, the face is all saliently white, showing how there is no character or depth behind those drawings. This represents how people are now just made of the themes consumerism and materialism because they have no personality and morals anymore and that they are dehumanised and unidentified as a person. This shows the ideas portrayed in the poem as the family that it focuses on always wants more than what they have and how their main goal isn’t their care for their child, but to win money and spend it. The
She is holding a child and has a scarlet letter “A” sewn on her bosom which stands for adultery. The narrator talks about her past and her beauty.
Collins compares something as meaningful as “a breathing body, and a beating heart” to the lanyard he gives his mother in return. Furthermore, he recollects how she taught him “to walk and swim” and he reciprocates by handing her a lanyard. This drastic comparison proves that children will never be able to repay their mother for all they have done for them. At the same time, Collins conveys the point that even just the thought of doing something small is enough to make the mother happy. A small gift, like a lanyard, gives the mother the emotional satisfaction and support that she has always given to her children no matter how minor it is.
In the short story “The Necklace” Madame Loisel was a rich women who thought she was poor. She valued having a nice appearance and looking elegant. Madame Loisel borrowed a necklace that she thought was gorgeous, she then lost the necklace but didn’t want to tell the lady she lost it so she went to look for
The physical image of poverty portrayed by the family reflects The Great Depression’s toll on their livelihood. It is clearly and plainly displayed that the mother and her children are impoverished by the techniques of black and white color choice, and intricate, detailed texture. The hardship faced by the family is highlighted by the photograph being in black and white. This allows for the simplicity of their condition to be shown without the distractions a photograph in color would provide. The image is very detailed and defined by texture, to leave no question to whether the family lacks wealth or riches.
In an effort to discover her identity, she embarked on a spiritual journey, writing poetry along the way. Mother’s Jewellery Box writes of the beginning of her lifelong expedition. The poem is riddled with various stylistic features that play into the idea of the poem being in the bildungsroman genre.
As I read the title I found myself delighted that the daughter could possibly be the narrator along with appreciation the daughter has for her mother then I thought to myself how cute that is. I’m convinced that the message through the text but mostly through the art is no matter what circumstances or tragedies a family may go through, together a family can hope for better and brighter days. The art which is definitely appealing to me in A Chair for My Mother illustrates with warm, bright and sadly a few dark colors. In any picture book it’s very important to realize the art that the illustrator is interpreting. Many illustrators convey messages in their art in many ways whether it’s through color, lines, or shapes.
“The Jewelry” is a short story written by Guy De Maupassant where M. Lantin marries a woman that loves jewelry and bought a new piece of jewelry everyday. He loved her dearly but could not stand the obsession she had for her fake jewelry collection. M. Lantins wife became really sick and died of pneumonia. He was then left by himself and became very poor. He had nothing left and needed to make money somehow.
The painting “Self-Portrait with Her Daughter, Julie” by Élisabeth Vigée Lebrun shows the artist’s daughter as an extension of herself not only meant to exalt her love for her child but also to show herself in a flattering light as the devoted and beautiful mother. “Self Portrait
Early in the novel, the reader gets the impression that the painting is pervaded by the longing for the youth that one has lost as well as the frightening deficiency of human life. In chapter eight this painting is described as: “the most magical of mirrors.” (Wilde 98). The portrait works
She was never happy and satisfied with what she had and always daydreamed of large ballrooms… decorated with oriental tapestries and lighted by high bronze floor lamps. She wanted to be the envy of all other women. When her husband gets an invite to the ball she wishes to appear wealthy to the other women at the ball. She borrows a diamond necklace from a wealthy friend, Mme Forestier. At the ball, she becomes pretty, elegant, gracious and smiling than all the other ladies, and she finds herself enjoying the party.
The protagonist of ‘The Necklace’, Madame Loisel, live a rather steady, ordinary middle-class life in the beginning of the story. However, she views that she is intended for a luxurious life, and, therefore, does not cherish what she has. She takes a step forward to her desires, as she was invited to a ball where all the upper-class woman would be, yet she was unhappy with the fact that she does not even have a stone to put on.