Parents support the use of corporal punishment within the public school system despite the ban on it in Kenya and Zimbabwe. Teachers in Kenya reported parents were aware their children tended to misbehave in school and had allowed corporal punishment to be enforced despite the ban on it (Mweru, 2010). Parents of students in Zimbabwe report they support corporal punishment to better the citizens of their country. They believe corporal punishment lowers crime rates in Zimbabwe. Parents of children in Kenya, Zimbabwe, and the United States refer to biblical and generational references in supporting corporal punishment.
They often plead that corporal punishment can show dominance, correct behavior, and that all children are different. Corporal punishment does display an aggressive form of dominance: but on the other hand, a child may revert to bullying other children to display dominance and also have high aggression levels and low patience. Similarly, physical discipline has never been scientifically proven to correct bad behavior long-term. Corporal punishment may fix an issue short-term, but eventually the child will do it again and spanking or hitting them will not fix the issue, rather they must address the issue in a calm manner and discuss with a child why what they have done is wrong. Given, all children are unique and react differently to a variety of different forms of discipline: corporally punishing a child has never been useful and a multitude of tests have been done on different children.
The Ineffectiveness of Corporal Punishment Corporal punishment should be banned from use in schools. To better understand why, we must first understand what we mean by corporal punishment. According to Lenta, “corporal punishment is the use of physical force with the intention of causing a child to experience pain, but not injury for the purpose of correction or control of the child’s behavior” (2012, p 693). Additionally an understanding of what discipline is will give a better understanding of this topic. Discipline, as described by Smith, “involves the teaching of children the boundaries of what is acceptable and what is not acceptable in society” (2006, p 115).
Con and Pros of Corporal Punishment at home. The cons of “Corporal punishment may negatively affect both the parent and child,leaving with heavy hearts and troubled minds.”(Author unknown. NYLN YOUTH LEADERBLOG. July28,2015. https://nyln.org/10-prevailing-pros-and-cons-of-corporal-punishment.
Guilty people deserve to be punished in proportion to the severity of their crime. Crime is when an individual violates the laws and regulations of their country. Capital punishment is also known as death penalty. Capital punishment is the execution of an offender as a punishment for his crime. It is necessary for those who refuse to accept unjust administration of punishment.
(source used) D. Concluding Sentence: Therefore, it is obvious that physical punishment is still being used by parents widely, yet this idea can be easily opposed due to the physical harm that the child is exposed to and how this creates children’s fear from their parents rather than loving them. III. Body Paragraphs IV. First Reason: psychological A. Topic Sentence: There is overwhelming evidence that physical punishment is both ineffective and harmful to a child’s psychological development.
It is also used to describe nonutilitarian theories of punishment based on justice and desert. In its third sense, the term retribution describes punishment that serves a utilitarian purpose: to vent public disgust toward criminals and, as a consequence, to increase respect for the law and eliminate the likelihood that citizens will "take the law into their own hands." Whatever meaning is attached to retribution, the paradigm does not become less desirable than other modes of capital punishment on "retributive" grounds. It is an inappropriate application of the criminal sanction to impose a crueler sanction simply to inflict more suffering upon the offender. Retributive
It is argued that any physical discipline is child abuse. But it is also debatable that physical contact is needed in order to show authority. Corporal Punishment is Effective James Dobson, an award winning child welfare advocate, speaks for physical discipline of children. Corporal punishment is defined as any type of physical punishment, i.e. spanking, as a way to correct a child’s behavior.
Capital punishment or better known as the death penalty is an ancient common practice that used to be implemented by many nations to punish people from the crimes they had committed by taking away their lives. As the years progress, the UN adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights In 1948, it stated “the Declaration proclaims the right of every individual to protection from deprivation of life. It states that no one shall be subjected to cruel or degrading punishment. The death penalty violates both of these fundamental rights.”(Amnesty International). According to Carsten Anckar in his article “why countries choose the death penalty?” the abolitionist movement did not have much force until many international treaties were drafted in
In most cases when a parent implements punishment it is at the child’s best interest with love and respect. As educators have little contact with each learners, they do not know the emotional wellbeing of the learner and do not always have the child’s best interest at heart. With this being said, it might also be a good idea for the Constitution to rethink measure of corporal punishment, as some forms of minor corporal punishment as years ago with a slap on the back of the hand for not doing homework can also bring about more respect for educators. Instead the Constitution limits punishment that will actually teach a learner a lesson, learners do not feel the need to respect the educator in front of the class or their instructions. Then again the question that comes to mind is what each person’s view of minor punishment might be.