Research hypotheses
1. The significant work has a positive effect on the organizational commitment of the employees in the social security organization.
2. The significant work has a positive effect on the employee's job engagement in the social security organization.
3. The job engagement has a positive effect on the organizational commitment of the employees in the social security organization.
4. The job engagement plays a mediator role in the relationship between significant work and organizational commitment.
Research method
In this research, based on the nature of the subject and the purpose of the research, descriptive-correlation research has been used. Descriptive, in this paper, the purpose of this study was to describe and analyze
…show more content…
First, we determine the percentage of employees in each branch from the entire population, and then, using the following equation, the size of each group is proportional to the total size of the branches:
Measurement tool
Organizational commitment questionnaire: In this research, Meyer and Allan's organizational commitment questionnaire (1990) has been used with 24 questions that measures the dimensions of emotional commitment, continuous commitment, and normative commitment. The questionnaire was designed in the form of questions closed answer with a five-point Likert scale (strongly agree up to strongly disagree).
Job engagement: In this research, Shufli and Salunava's job engagement questionnaire (2001) have been used with 17 questions that measures the dimensions of energy, dedication and absorption. The questionnaire was designed in the form of questions closed answer with a five-point Likert scale (strongly agree up to strongly disagree).
Significant work: In this research, Dick and Steiger (2008) and Harpez & Fu's (2002) questionnaire with 18 questions were used that measures the dimensions of work centrality, legal norms, economic relations, interpersonal relationships, significant tendencies and subjunctive
…show more content…
As a result, job engagement has a mediator role in the relationship between significant work and organizational commitment. In addition, the results of path analysis showed that the path coefficient between these two variables is equal to 0.389, which indicates that 38.9 percent of organizational commitment changes are explained by significant work in the presence of mediator role of job engagement. This result suggests that a unit of change in significant work changes 38.9 percent of organizational commitment in the presence of mediator role of job engagement.
As shown in Fig. 3, the overall path coefficient between two variables of significant work and organizational commitment is 0.516. This value is obtained from the sum of the direct path coefficient in Table (6) (0.127) with the indirect path coefficient in Table (10) (0.398). Therefore, it can be stated in general that 51.6 percent of organizational commitment changes are explained by the significant work.
Studying the quality of the research
Courts turn to common law principles to analyze the character of an economic relationship (Master-servant), NY 8th Circuit stare decisis was established by Graves v. Women 's Prof 'l Rodeo Assoc. , 907 F.2d 71, 74 (8th Cir.1990). “Where no financial benefit is obtained by the purported employee from the employer, no “plausible” employment relationship of any sort can be said to exist because although “compensation by the putative employer to the putative employee in exchange for his services is not a sufficient condition, it is an essential condition to the existence of an employer-employee relationship.”
The target population would be approximately 67 participants (10 supervisors and 57 subordinates) will be asked to report on work relational environment within the organization and their perceived relationship (Orchard et al., 2012). The consent forms with a letter explaining the details about the study will be administered via email in line by the Internal Review Board (IRB). Any additional documents will be delivered via email using Microsoft Word. The surveys will be used as the instrument to collect data.
Contents Terms of Reference 2 Procedure 2 Findings 3 Current Structure 3 New Structure 4 Employee Relationships 4 Instructing Staff 5 Contingency Variables 5 Conclusion 6 Recommendations 6 References 7 Appendix A 8 Terms of Reference I am a HNC business student. I am writing this report as part of my course. This assessment covers outcome 4 of the Managing People and Organizations' class.
The goal of the research paper is to inform readers about
This leads the authors to perform a study with the attempt of
My goal in this paper is to discuss the impact and role the
Work family influenced and family affected work are connected with one another and are bidirectional.(Greenhaus and Beutell 1985). Representatives capacity identified with work is meddled by strain made by family(Netemeyer, Boles et al. 1996). WFC has negative connection with family execution and FWC has negative connection with JP (Frone, Russell et al. 1992). Work struggle has family based experience and leads towards business related outcomes.(Frone, Yardley et al.
The references used in this study will be used to build knowledge on the subject, and to identify
Trust vs. mistrust, 2. Autonomy vs. shame, 3. Initiative vs. guilt, 4. Industry vs. inferiority, 5. Identity vs. confusion, 6.
Micael Sega Written Response #3 CONCEPT QUESTIONS 1) The difference between groups and teams is whether or not they work towards one goal or individual goals. A group is two or more individuals that are connected that work on individual goals. For example, two employees of the same company that work in different sectors.
On completion of the case study about the SAS Institute, I stormed across these four factors; Job performances, organizational citizenship, Absenteeism, Turnover. According to the case study, these four factors have proven to have the strongest influences over work behaviors. Furthermore, the approaches the leadership of the SAS institute takes towards them, I believe, have been the essence of their success. Their approach is unique and is likely not what employees are a to in the contemporary firms and different places of work, it is, ‘’the value they have towards people’’
Human Relation Management in Tesla Human relation management is a belief that individuals desire to be part of a supportive team that encourages growth and development (Business.com). Human relation management focuses on employee 's feelings, career enrichment, induction procedures, encouragement of teams, stability and motivation. The benefits of human relations management theory are rises in employee productivity, employee consideration, employee recognition, relationship building between employees and managers. Disadvantages are unpredictable workplace conduct, strategies based on behavior in the workplace and one method works for everyone. "Tesla is consciously creating a benefits structure that is different from what other companies
Meyer et al. (2001) came forth later to conceptualise organisational commitment as a multidimensional construct. According to their view commitment can initiate a force that can guide a course of action towards its one or more targets. In initial stage organisational commitment was identified by Meyer and Allen (1984) as a construct with two dimensions named as affective commitment and continuance commitment. The first dimension, affective commitment was described by Meyer and Allen (1984) as positive feelings one employee holds while he identifies with or attach to or involve in the work of a certain
Moreover, both job satisfaction and employee engagement are playing a significant role through accomplishing the organizational goals and objectives effectively and efficiency. Job satisfaction is important in the organizational settings, because according to Robbins and judge in 2013, first of all, job satisfaction affects productivity because several studies have stated that, the more employees are satisfied and happy, they more likely to have more products. Secondly, job satisfaction influences absenteeism, there is a negative relationship among job satisfaction absenteeism because satisfied employees are less likely to miss work. In the third place, job satisfaction again plays an essential role through the decisions of staying or leaving of the workers within the organization which is called turnover .in the fourth stage, job satisfaction is the main consideration of an employee 's organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), also the employees who are more satisfied are more likely to involve in OCBs, and talk more positively about the firm.