The experience collegiate athlete’s gain while they are in college is something you cannot put a price on. College sports provide opportunities for student-athletes to develop leadership skills and time management, community building, and of course earn a degree. Also, college sports create undoubted campus pride and identity. However, rising expenses and the desire to increase revenue to support college sports have become a weaker factor for many institutions, regardless of sport or the size of the program's mission. According to the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), “over the past decade, spending on athletics has been rising at a rate three to four times faster than the rate of increase of academic budgets among institutions competing in the NCAA’s Division I” (Kirwan, 2010). Almost every other university, especially in Division I, institutional spending on athletics is becoming a bigger issue. Only more successful college sports teams give the institution the opportunity to generate enough revenue to cover their costs.
Usually revenue is generated by athletics through ticket sales, broadcast
…show more content…
Of course, institutional budget is not able to cover all expenses because athletic budget is rising more quickly than the institutional budget. Most programs rely on institutional resources such as academics and student fees to balance their budgets. “If the trend of athletic spending outpacing institutional spending continues, institutions will need to be able to justify that spend to the university community and the general public,” said NCAA Chief Financial Officer Kathleen McNeely. “The value that athletics brings to campus life, life-long connection to alumni, and enhancing diversity on campus are all important outcomes from athletic programs that need to be celebrated and
Injustice Case for NCAA Players NCAA athletes should be compensated due to their devotion towards extra-curricular schooling along with recreational activities. In the Huffington Post, economist convey that NCAA schools can definitely afford to pay college athletes. Spokeswoman Meghan Durham asserts that only 20 of the approximate 1,100 schools which constitute the NCAA make more from sports than they spend on sports, according to association’s most recent estimates. Rodney Fort, former sports economists…exposes that the money is already there since the NCAA brought about a billion dollars in revenue in its most recent financial year and top tier athletic programs regularly bring in tens of millions of dollars as well. Opponents stated that
With the internet allowing up to date stats and scores, TV station fighting to show games, tickets sales and the selling of merchandise, there are millions of dollars being poured into the NCAA and colleges annually. Turner Broadcasting and CBS signed a 14-year $10.8 billion deal to be able to broadcast the NCAA national championship tournament (Nocera, Let’s Start Paying College Athletes). Now some colleges even have their own TV stations to broadcast games. ESPN has also signed a deal with Bowl Championship Series (BCS) for $500 million over 4 years (Wildon). College athletes are the only ones not seeing any of the billions of dollars that their efforts are bringing in.
With the revenue quickly escalating, college athletes appear more as employees because of the money they are generating for their school program (Berry III,
Not all athletes receive full rides or any scholarships at all yet, they still spend as much time and put as much effort into the sport just as someone who has had one received. The NCAA league makes a reportedly $11+ billion a year. None of which goes to any athlete. Paying the athlete could make the sport more competitive and appealing to one 's eye.
College football, as an “amateur” sport, produces nearly $3.5 billion dollars a year, but the young men who play the game, primarily African American, don’t see a penny of revenue. Yes, student athletes get tuition, room and board, and lots of Nike, Adidas or Under Armour gear, but they’re really free labor. The world refers to them as “student athletes,”. There are three different levels of competition under the NCAA. Division I, Division II and Division III are the three levels associated with the NCAA.
Moreover, the unequal distribution of funds between sports carried out by college administrators is the real issue. To support this statement, “The NCAA also points out that nonrevenue men's sports are often cut to provide more funds for the two big revenue sports, football and basketball. In 2006, for instance, Rutgers University dropped men's tennis, a team with a budget of approximately $175,000. The National Women's Law Center points out that Rutgers spent about $175,000 in the same year on hotel rooms for the football team - for home games” (qtd. in Goodale). While Title IX is receiving much of the blame for recent cuts to men’s sports, the fact of the matter is that the blame really belongs to colleges’ administration teams and they way that they budget their money.
College athletes also bring in an incredible amount of money. Journalist Michael Wilbon has written that seeing the $11 billion deal between the NCAA and CBS/Turner Sports for March Madness between 2011 and 2024 prompted him to change his mind about paying student- athletes. This deal shows the amount of money the NCAA is bringing in over the course of one month alone. March Madness is one of the most watched sporting events in the country.
College athletes are not receiving a physical paycheck; instead they are receiving a scholarship that is worth much
College tuition is a big expense, as many people know, but for some people this expense may be covered by receiving a scholarship for academics and/or athletics. As a grade 12 student athlete I have been paying more attention to tuition and scholarships lately, one thing I have come to realize is; not every college or university athlete receives compensation for playing. College and university athletes typically struggle in their programs and deal with a lot of stress because of how demanding their sports and studies are, it's also extremely hard to effectively time manage and get everything done. Another thing to highlight is how difficult it is to become an athlete in a post secondary setting. An additional thought that comes to mind is what
According to Cork Gaines, “there are now 20 schools that make at least $100 million in sports”. This fact is supported by Figure C (Revenue* of college football teams in 2014 (in million U.S.
There are few who do not enjoy the thrill of watching or playing sports. We enjoy the thrill of aggressively engaging with others while playing a sport and watching those playing in game and supporting them. While almost every college across America has a diverse group of sports teams, we cannot ignore that colleges and universities are in place with one major purpose: provide students with an educational degree that they can further their success and knowledge. Because college sports are so widely known, played and enjoyed, colleges should continue to support their sports teams, however, there need to be some stipulations on how far that support and encouragement goes. By making sure that coaches are not getting paid more than the professors, having requirements for students enrolled at the university who want to play sports, and by not losing the focus and the purpose of the university, sports should be supported by colleges.
College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities.
In their journal “The Case of Paying College Athletes”, John Siegfried and Allen Sanderson point out many discrepancies in NCAA policies, but do not support monetary payment. They argue: “College athletes are in fact currently paid, in the sense that the majority receive grants-in-aid that cover most – although not all – of their college expenses.” (Pg. 127). After this statement, the authors detail the demanding payments varying depending on each college
Division I Athletes Should Be Paid In college there can be a wide of activities to enjoy. Social and academic clubs, fraternities and sororities however, there is one activity very popular in universities that not only gives students a sense of unity and pride as they cheer for their home team but generates millions of dollars in revenue for the NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association): college sport teams. With the popularity of college sports and the vast amount of revenue colleges are generating from these sports an argument about whether these college athletes should be given a salary has begun to surface. Tracey M DiLascio, a graduate of Boston University school of Law and a former judicial clerk in the New Jersey Superior Court, states “The NCAA estimated revenue in 2014 was nearly $1 billion, 80 to 90 percent which came from the Men’s division 1 basketball tournament” (3).
Should college athletes be paid? Annotated Bibliography Benedykiuck, Mike. “The Blue Line: College athletes should be paid.” Dailyfreepress.