Could Suspending Students Result In Better Behavior?
Could suspending students have a positive impact on grades and progress in school? Could it lead to better behavior inside and outside a classroom? Could it be better for their awareness of their actions? In the past, students have been suspended for joking about severe possibilities of attacks on schools such as school shootings. They have been suspending students for about a week to the rest of the school year and while some students may find this funny, others try to avoid making a bad impression on themselves. Although it may be a tiresome job, schools should continue to suspend students for bad behavior because it can prevent them from making the same mistake, it can make an improvement on their behavior in class and at school, it can overall affect their attitude making
…show more content…
Administrators may also favor suspension because it edges problem students out of school. Even though some kids may find entertainment in this and it can make them seem more popular, most students find it degrading to themselves so they try to avoid this again. This means that when children are gone from the place that they can disrupt, they find no more interest in redoing that same mistake.
Students need to be suspended for their unacceptable behavior because it can make a huge improvement on their behavior in class and at school. A 2011 study showed that Texas students who were suspended or expelled at least once during middle school and high school averaged four such disciplinary actions during their academic careers. Some may believe that this has no impact on their behavior and it could only just make it worse but for most students, it improves over the suspension. This means that having the students know about what they´ve been suspended for can make them try to change up their
The suspension would last until they returned to school without the armband. Three students were suspended until they returned to
The Court stated that the District Court should have considered evidence to prove the value of each school day that was missed. The Court ruled the students would not be able to recover any damages representing the number of school days missed. Finally, the Court of Appeals held that even if the District Court found the suspensions to be justified, they would be entitled to recover non-punitive damages simply because they had been denied due
These include turning in work late, skipping class, and wearing clothes that aren’t in dress code. Because of the lack of consequences, students continue to engage in these activities and the behavior spreads. At the beginning
They could contact parents to see if there is a problem that lies under all the actions that the student displays. The goal is to keep the students in the classroom or in the school because, external suspension can be overused and misused. External suspension does not have to be the first form of punishment because, the students are not learning while they are home. In-school suspension is more lenient and is used so that the students will still be obligated to learn whether they want to or
Giving students school suspension or even expulsion gives these students consequences so that
The First Amendment says that we are in tiled to your own freedom of speech even as a minor. In schools the teachers are trying to limit what students can say, do, or wear. There should be some restrictions placed but not as many as there are. It should stay where students have freedom of speech because it opens students up for more opinion in the class and on there work. It also lets students feel like they are not being controlled by someone.
53). The research used students of all ages, races, sex, and sexual orientation and identity. The subjects were not chosen based off any specific criteria other than the fact that they attend the public school system within the United States (p. 53). The study was carried out through analyzing public records data, such as the U.S. Department of Education for Civil Rights, in order to determine the number of students suspended within a time period, within what grades were they suspended in, and the reason for their suspension (p. 53-54). McCarter also incorporated research from various authors into her own in order to draw accurate conclusions of the negative consequences that zero-tolerance policies, high-stakes testing, school climate, the increased presence of SROs and their adverse effects on students (p.
The literature review clearly has shown that there is a phenomenon called School to Prison, Schoolhouse to Jailhouse, or Public Education to Prison Pipeline. Therefore, Jeremy Thompson (2016) says, “Zero-tolerance policies in schools result in high suspension rates and expulsion rates among students in general, but disproportionately affect minority students, especially African-Americans because students who have been suspended or expelled are more likely than not to end up in the Criminal Justice
Or the North Carolina teenagers arrested and charged with “disorderly conduct” in 2013 for an end-of-the-year water balloon fight. This list continues endlessly (Flannery). Schools and the NEA took many different approaches to put an end to these needless practices by ordering school districts to respond to student misbehavior in fair, non-discriminatory, and effective ways. NEA leaders started to raise awareness of the issue, shape district and state policies, and provide resources on restorative practices. In 2014 an education association worked on creating a new student code of conduct that minimizes suspensions and allows students to learn from their mistakes.
Suspension is only temporary and will not solve anything. In one of the articles it mentions a girl,Cindy, who has been suspended in the past for fighting then got in trouble again for fighting but this time the school used Restorative Justice. Eventually Cindy would have made an enemy with the boys not understanding what they had said and the boys would not know what had caused Cindy to fight. In the article it states that “Rather than solving a problem, everything about the traditional way of handling situations like this one only contributes to the likelihood that it will happen again”. Although suspension removes the student from the situation, this will not solve the problem and most likely worsen it and the students should be talked to and listened to.
Although when giving students suspension it does give them time to reflect, school suspension is not a good punishment because, when students are taken out of school for a couple of days they miss assignments and do not take responsibility for their conduct, when students go to in-school suspension they do not receive the day’s class work, work is completed incorrectly, and/or students use time to sleep, and all in all, the students do not get the correct help they need to overcome the problem whereas if the student was treated with a system called restorative justice, the student could learn to not go through the same situation. When students are taken out of school for a couple of days they miss assignments and do not take responsibility for their conduct. Think of this for example, Thomas is suspended and taken out of school for a couple of days,
A public school cannot suspend a student with no notice or hearing because it infringes on his or her rights. The specific amendments broken by the public school officials are primarily the fifth and sixth. Public schools are not allowed to take away rights and liberties given to the American people. The suspended student was denied his rights to due process and his right to formal informant of crime committed. A liberty that every American enjoys is upon crime committed they are awarded a hearing/trial in order to promote fairness.
They were all suspended without being given a hearing prior to their suspension, or they weren’t given a hearing within a reasonable time after their suspension. Federal court mandated that the suspensions of the students be removed from their cumulative record. The Columbus Public School System and school board appealed the ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the due process clause of the 14th amendment had been violated. SCOTUS ruled 5-4 in favor of the students of the Columbus Public School
This isn 't the first time that "bureaucratic determinism," where administrators declare themselves powerless to exert discretion and end up punishing students for infractions that even they agree didn 't contain any elements of threat or aggression, has triggered calls for a more lenient approach. Public outrage and media exposure have succeeded in reversing sanctions in cases such as suspensions when a student makes a "finger gun" (some schools interpret any such displays as threats). It 's an uphill battle, though, and the stone rolls down as soon as it reaches the top. A 13-year-old girl received a three-day suspension from a Texas middle school for a finger gun in 2010, making headlines; in December 2012, the hammer of justice came down on a 6-year-old, who received a one-day suspension from a Maryland elementary school for the same reason. That incident made the Washington Post, with over a thousand comments lambasting the school administrators for overreacting; nonetheless, in October of 2013, an 8-year-old was suspended for a day in Florida, also for making a finger
Suspension is an easy and inexpensive way to get a troubled student out of your hair. But suspension is not always a great punishment because getting to stay home in the comfort of your bed and house doesn’t teach a good lesson, some kids action may not have been bad