ipl-logo

Court Calendaring And Continuance

737 Words3 Pages

In the federal court system, the Court Clerk is responsible for the courts calendar and dockets (Administrative Office of the United States Courts, 2016). The federal courts use electronic case management for recording dockets, and producing calendars (United States Court, n.d.). This also helps promote efficiency by allowing the parties involved in the case to access court records online (United States Court, n.d.). Electronic dockets “are available to the public one day after they are entered” into the system (Administrative Office of the United States Courts, 2016). This gives the public immediate access to the court dockets.
State and local courts differ from federal courts because not every court has court clerks. Most states do …show more content…

In the state system, judges would consider the continuance if “good cause” is shown to the court that justifies the continuance (Steelman, 2008). If the continuance is granted, the defense would “waive time” and the trial would be calendared for the next available trial date (TN Courts, n.d.). The state judge would also ensure the continuance would not have any potential negative impacts on the case (Steelman, 2008). In this scenario, a continuance may have a negative impact on prosecution if they are required to turn over the discovery and defense is provided a prolonged opportunity to review the discover. If the prosecutor is not required turn over the discovery, the defense attorney may not be able to effectively defend his or her client, which may result in a delay in a resolution of the case. Since both attorneys are not agreeing to the continuance, and arguments are made that it may hinder the case resolution, a state judge would likely deny the request. Since this case would be heard in a federal U.S. District Court, the request for continuance and calendaring would be handled differently than a state court. The federal judge can consider the status of the trial calendar as a factor to grant or not grant a continuance (Second Judicial District, 1997). The scenario explains that the judges calendar is full for the next ten months; therefore, it is likely he would decide to try the case

Show More
Related

  • Essay On My Cousin Vinny

    1972 Words  | 8 Pages

    The United States Criminal Justice system has a unique way of approaching and handling criminal trials. In criminal trials there are important court room members with specific roles and certain court room procedures that must be followed. The court room members include the jury, the judge, the prosecution, and the defense. Some of the procedures of a criminal trial are arraignment, preliminary hearing, the trial itself, opening statements, direct examination, cross examination, closing arguments and the verdict. Each court room member’s goal is to fulfill their responsibility and to help justice be served.

    Read More

  • Murder Of Vanessa Pham By Julio Miguel Blanco-Garcia

    1235 Words  | 5 Pages

    After listening to both sides present their case the judge will issue a ruling on the defendant’s

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Crooks Trial Closing

    1209 Words  | 5 Pages

    This part of the trial method is where the prosecutor shows his or her proof as to why the courtroom desires to continue with a tribulation. The defendant's lawyer has the threat to pass-examine any witnesses and to peer what precisely the proof is that the prosecutor is going to use in opposition to his or her purchaser. a few prosecutors, however, will choose to not conduct a preliminary listening to and could flow instantly into the Grand Jury section of a prison trial. they will pick out this to shield their witnesses and proof in order that this could be delivered out in the front of the Grand Jury. The initial listening to a section of the trial usually takes place five-6 days after an

    Read More

  • Law Clerks In Storm Center By David O Brien

    886 Words  | 4 Pages

    Law Clerks and the Supreme Court In his book, Storm Center, David O’Brien explains how the role of Supreme Court Law Clerks has evolved dramatically over time. The first clerk was not hired until 1882, meanwhile, it was not a paid position until 1886. In contrast, today law clerks are so essential to the Court’s structure that they are sometimes referred to as “junior justices.”

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Brady V. Bobti

    596 Words  | 3 Pages

    Introduction: The United States Supreme Court cases of Brady v. Maryland, Giglio v. United States, and United States v. Agurs all deal with the prosecution's obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense. These cases establish that prosecutors have a constitutional duty to disclose all evidence favorable to the accused. Failure to disclose this information violates due process and can result in a new trial or acquittal.

    Read More

  • Motion To Stay Discovery: Case Study

    411 Words  | 2 Pages

    Tilley v. United States, 270 F. Supp. 2d 731, 734-35 (M.D.N.C. 2003). “In deciding whether to stay discovery pending resolution of a pending motion, the Court inevitably must balance the harm produced by a delay in discovery against the possibility that the motion will be granted and entirely eliminate the need for such discovery.” Simpson v. Specialty Retail Concepts, Inc., 121 F.R.D. 261, 263 (M.D.N.C. 1988). The Court may “peek” at the merits of the

    Read More

  • California Legal System Case Study

    243 Words  | 1 Pages

    C. California Legal System 1. Survey of State and Local Lawmaking Bodies California (State) Law Lawmaking Body Branch Type of Law Publication California Legislature Legislative Statutory Law West’s Annotated California Codes, Deering’s Annotated California Codes California Supreme Court Judicial Case Law California Reports, California Reporter, Pacific Reporter California Courts of Appeal Judicial Case Law California Appellate Reports, California Reporter (after 1960), Pacific Reporter (through 1959) California Superior Courts (trial courts in each county) Judicial Orders Not officially reported, but may be available online through individual court docket websites. California Administrative Agencies Executive State Regulations Barclay’s

    Read More

  • Courtroom Workgroup Case Study

    672 Words  | 3 Pages

    Judge Stevens’s courtroom displayed such interactions. In the case of The State of Texas v. Manuel Gonzalez Barajas. No. 334409, the attorney for Mr. Barajas, Dustin Galmor, failed to promptly inform his client of his trial date. The defense attorney spoke

    Read More

  • Wisconsin State Court System Analysis

    1587 Words  | 7 Pages

    I began by examining the structure of each state 's court system as outlined by their respective website. I began in Wisconsin where the lowest courts are municipal courts. Wisconsin has 237 municipal courts staffed by 240 municipal judges. The largest municipal court is in Milwaukee and is staffed by three full time judges and hears more than 110,000 cases yearly. Municipal courts hear cases from a wide variety of cases, including traffic, parking, building code violations, trespassing, health code violations, animal control violation, truancy, and first time drunk driving offences.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Essay On Texas Judges

    1045 Words  | 5 Pages

    A County Court judge doesn’t require a law degree because they are an administrator. The County Court judge serves as the chief executive officer for the county, meaning they have executive power over county departments. The County Court judge also controls the Commissioners Court and proposes their county’s budget (Role of the County Judge). This is different than the Supreme Court judges, who serve specifically as a judicial branch and don’t serve as an executive function.

    Read More

  • Arraignment: Court Case Study

    210 Words  | 1 Pages

    The prosecution can choose which way to indict you either preliminary

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Courts And California Courts

    342 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to the Superior Court of California website, there are two systems of courts in California such as federal and state. State courts divide in trial courts and appellate courts. Trial courts may also be called Superior courts, and each county has at least one trial court. Criminal cases, civil cases, appeals of small claims cases and other civil cases worth $25,000 or less are handed to trial courts. Sometimes, superior courts also handle the appeals of misdemeanor cases.

    Read More

  • 13 Appellate Courts

    128 Words  | 1 Pages

    There are 13 appellate courts, and they are called the U.S. Courts of Appeals. The 12 regional circuits are the 94 federal districts organized and set into groups, each controlling an appellate court. The appellate court’s task is to decide whether or not the law was carried out correctly in the trial court. Appeals courts have three judges and no jury. A court of appeals hears challenges to district court decisions from courts located within its circuit, as well as appeals from decisions of federal administrative agencies.

    Read More

  • Three Levels Of The Federal Courts Essay

    492 Words  | 2 Pages

    Going up from there are the circuit courts, the district courts of appeal, and the supreme court. There are 67 county courts, one in each county. These courts are of limited jurisdiction and deal with only minor offenses. The circuit courts are the states courts of original jurisdiction and are courts of record. They also hear appeals from the county courts.

    Read More

  • Essay On Judicial Selection

    801 Words  | 4 Pages

    Judicial selection is an intriguing topic as there are multiple ways that judges take their seat on the bench. The United States Constitution spells out how federal judges are selected and leaves it up to the individual states to establish their means for selecting judges. In federal courts, judges are appointed and it varies between appointment and election for state courts. The purpose of this paper is to examine the differences between appointments and elections (as well as the multiple types of elections) and to give an opinion as to which is the better alternative. Federal judges are appointed by the President of the United States and are confirmed on the advice and consent of the United States Senate.

    Read More

More about Court Calendaring And Continuance

Open Document