In the United States 1,625 cases has been wrongfully convicted, for crimes they haven’t done nor have any connections to it. Sedrick Courtney’s is a prime example of wrongfully convicted people. The Case of Sedrick Courtney is form to show how our criminal justice system is corrupt.
Sedrick Courtney was wrongfully convicted for the robbery on Shemita Greer in Tulsa, Oklahoma. He spent 15 years of his life because of the eye-witness misidentification of Shemita Greer. “Sedrick Courtney is a 23 year old man wrongfully convicted and spent 15 years in jail” (Innocence Project). This shows how many years he has spent in jail innocent because of the government and one person’s mistake. The crime went down, and who the victim in it which is Shemita
…show more content…
Sedrick Courtney was arrested on Jun, 12, 1995 and charged with robbery and burglary. Ski masks were found outside of Shemita Greer’s apartment. “Police recovered both ski mask, one black and one green, near the scene” (Innocence Project). This ski masks should’ve proved his innocence but DNA testing was really bad only evidence they relied on was the lady saying it’s him, this really. “[H]e borrowed his sister’s car… to attend a class at the unemployment center” (“Sedrick Courtney”). His family gave information about where he was that morning, the police could’ve checked if he really was at the unemployment center that would’ve helped them a lot. DNA testing was another problem back than it is not as accurate as it is nowadays, additionally they also rejected and lied to the Innocence Project. It really shows how government never wants to be wrong, it also shows what they did is wrong which led this guy to being arrested. “False or misleading forensic science evidence, the hair was microscopically consistent only” (medium.com). Because of the lack of evidence and lack of forensic DNA testing skills Sedrick Courtney got arrested. “DNA testing in 2001 had been rejected, the Tulsa department claimed evidence had been destroyed” (Innocence Project). The Tulsa Department said his evidence was destroyed, but when the Innocence Project retested them in 2007 and proved Sedrick Courtney’s innocence …show more content…
The Tulsa Department extend the time Courtney staying in jail, because of the decision they’ve made. They rejected the Innocence project when they knew how to prove Sedrick Courtney’s innocence with the Mitochondrial DNA testing. ”Innocence project used mitochondrial DNA testing instead of regular forensic science” (Innocence Project). The Tulsa Department used the regular forensic science which was false and misleading for Sedrick Courtney’s case. Mitochondrial DNA testing is very accurate with proving the matching of hair and DNA. ”Mitochondrial DNA testing showed that none of the 15 hairs matched Courtney” (Innocence Project). If the Tulsa Department approved of the Innocence Project instead of rejecting there offer in 2001, Courtney would’ve been innocent long time ago. After Innocence Project help out Sedrick Courtney’s case and proved him innocent, he decides to settle a lawsuit with the city of Tulsa but he also received a state compensation of $175,000. “On July 19, 2012, a Tulsa County District judge granted the Innocence Project’s motion to exonerate Courtney” (Innocence Project). Every wrongfully convicted person should truly respect what they do for others to prove their innocence. ”Sedrick settled a lawsuit with the city of Tulsa for $8 million in October of 2015, after filing it in June of 2014” (Meduim.com). Sedrick Courtney really did a smart move by settling a lawsuit, he
Even when Michael’s new defense team, through the innocence project, found a crime that was eerily similar to the method of murder and subsequent events to the one that Michael was convicted of, the new prosecutor in Williamson County fought hard to keep DNA testing from taking place, even stating that they objected to the testing now because the defense hadn’t requested it before (Morton, 2014). There was further evidence of ineffectiveness in that the coroner who’d changed his estimated time of death between the autopsy and trial, had come under scrutiny for his findings in this case, as well as several others, with claims of gross errors “including one case where he came to the conclusion that a man who’d been stabbed in the back had committed suicide” (Morton, 2014). This was only one of the many injustices that were committed against Michael Morton throughout his trial. In August of 2006, the defense was finally granted permission to perform DNA testing on the items that had been taken from his wife’s body (Morton, 2014). Although this testing did not reveal any information about the guilty party, it did at least give Michael the knowledge that Chris was not sexually violated before or after her death (Morton,
STATEMENT OF THE CASE On January 13, 1999. the defendant Adnan Syed (seventeen), lived in Baltimore County, Maryland and was accused of the murder of his ex girlfriend, Hae Min Lee (seventeen). Jay Wilds is involved in the crime, an acquaintance of Adnan who claims to have helped bury the body of Hae Min Lee. Stephanie Mcpherson, was Jay Wilds girlfriend at the time of the murder.
This shows that there is more than one suspect for the crime and they should have
In April 2002, the Wisconsin innocence project opened the case again after advancement in DNA testing and on September 11, 2003 identified that Steven Avery was indeed not guilty and the DNA matched a man named Gregory Allen who has been arrested several times for sexual assault. Steven Avery later went to sue the Manitowoc police department for 36 million dollars for wrongful conviction. One big point that Avery made was that when he was in prison Gregory Allen raped a Green Bay woman in 1995. Gregory Allen is currently serving a 60 year sentence for kidnapping and rapeing that woman. On October 31, 2005, photographer Teresa Halbach was scheduled to meet with Steven Avery at his home on the property of Avery's Auto Salvage to photograph his sister's minivan
In 1993 Maher wrote the innocence project who then helped him fight his case. In 1997 the Innocence project filed a motion for DNA which was denied without a hearing. In 2001 a law student found a box that contained evidence from the lowell cases in the basement of the Middlesex County Courthouse. In the box there were pants and underwear collected from both victims. Both sources of evidence were sent to Forensic Science Associates where the performed DNa testing.
Resulting in Barbour to contact the Innocence Project, which agreed to represent him. In June of 2010, he wasn't informed of his innocence till 18 months later, due to complications of locating him. They finally found the right man who convicted the crime and Barbour was ecstatic that he was finally proven innocent. He was 57 years old.
Throughout the trial Steven claimed he had nothing to do with the assault, however, he was still found guilty. In 2002, the Wisconsin Innocence Project took Avery's case. As a result of improvements in DNA testing, they were able to exonerate Avery in 2003 based on DNA evidence indicating that someone other than Avery committed the crime. The DNA was matched to one Gregory Allen.
It was not until 2003, that he was actually able to access his trials evidence, which was being preserved at the Florida Department of Law Enforcement also known as the FDLE. The spermatozoa found on the evidence were subjected to three rounds of DNA testing at three different laboratories. Prosecutors agreed that the evidence should be tested. After being tested, the last round of testing at the Forensic Science Associates, had confirmed Crotzers innocence. It was found that the spermatozoa from the rape kit of the adult female victim came from an unknown male suspect.
They found his DNA from a cigarette butt that they found. The murderer was 51 years old and he has a twin brother that he blamed it on. One thing i don't understand is how they blamed it on him when his brother could have been on the property to, just because the cigarette butt had his DNA on it they blame it on him. This case is really important because a man murdered an innocent teacher.
He contacted the Innocence Project after numerous attempts to get a DNA test from semen found at the scene of the crime. The Innocence Project tried to get tapes of the false confession, then tried to get a DNA test of the semen found. After some back and forth it was found that the semen had gone for identification, only it never reached the laboratory. The evidence was the found in 2001 and test. The DNA did not match Godschalk's, but he was still denied release.
The judge sentenced Avery to thirty-two years in prison for a crime that he may or may not have committed. He was told if he admitted to the crime they would release him from jail, but he refused because he did not want to admit to something he did not do. He and his wife got a divorce and he lost custody of all his children while he was in prison. Eighteen years later Avery finally got what he wanted and was proved to be innocent. There was one single hair from the case that was collected and was tested.
(ID Documentary) Their fingerprints, hair samples, and other forms of DNA did not match up to the evidence found at the scene. (wrongfulconvictionnews) Regardless of not having physical evidence the stereotype of these teens is enough for the police to still bring them to trial. The ignorance that maintained through this trial from the community to the officers investigating it was consistent.
In 1983, Archie Williams was sent to prison after being accused of rape and attempted murder in Louisiana. At the time of his accusation, he was struggling with his economic stance as a 22 year old. During his trial, multiple pieces of evidence were presented that should’ve proved his innocence. The police had found fingerprints at the scene of the crime, but when they ran them, they didn’t match Mr. Williams’. Along with the Victim never identifying Williams (Only did after police forced her to), and multiple witnesses attesting for Archie being in his bed when the crime was committed.
In 1988, Harrison asked for a DNA test, which was done but testing at that time, came back with the results of unable to determine, being that the US had only been using it since 1986. (Justice) After have spent 15 years in prison, Clarence Harrison contacted a group named “The Innocent Project,” to take on his case to prove his innocence and was accepted.
(Costanzo & Gerrity, 2009, p. 185). Garrett (2011)’s study showed that more than 25% detainees wrongfully convicted but later exonerated by DNA evidence made a false confession or incriminating statement. In