ipl-logo

Court Systems: The Change In Court System

868 Words4 Pages

Title The Change In Court Systems In the State Court of California, there is an accused man for murder. The judges are examining the evidence this man has put up showing he is not guilty. Eventually, the police find a footage of someone else in the scene of the murder, so the man who was accused, was set free from jail after one month in a fair, speedy, trial. Now, what was it that allowed that man to prove he was not guilty? If you go down into the roots of the Court System, you will find that it was an Amendment, the Sixth Amendment specifically, that allowed that man, and anyone else accused of a crime that are not guilty, to have a fair trial. The …show more content…

According to http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/sixth+amendment, The Sixth Amendment was needed for the accused to have the right of a fair and speedy trial, and the right of a fair judgement. For example, the accused is to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation. The accused is to also have the Assistance of Counsel for his/her defence. According to http://public.getlegal.com/legal-info-center/6th-amendment/, “During the jury questioning process, called voir dire, both the prosecution and the defence may ask potential jurors questions whose answers might show bias.” Meaning, the accused(defence), and the prosecution(offence), can bring someone in, to ask questions that could possibly show of major importance. The defendant may also request a closed trial, and each side also gets a certain number of peremptory challenges which means that it may dismiss potential jurors for no cause at all. The accused is allowed a speedy trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district where in the crime shall have been committed.This is the meaning of the Sixth

Show More
Related

  • Under The Sixth Amendment: The Right To Impartial Jury

    272 Words  | 2 Pages

    Under the Sixth Amendment. The Sixth Amendment guarantees a criminal defendant the right to impartial jury. The jury will consider the evidence against the defendant and decide whether to find him or her guilty of the crime. Twelve jurors must agree in order to find a defendant guilty or not guilty. If the jury fails to reach a unanimous verdict and finds itself at a standstill, the judge may declare a mistrial.

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Stinney Case

    458 Words  | 2 Pages

    There also was no prosecution witnesses were not crossed examine. The due process was not followed, which lead to a short trial, and a quick verdict. This was the violation of the 5th Amendment because the right to due process.

    Read More

  • 6th Amendment Confrontation Clause

    62 Words  | 1 Pages

    The central issue being looked at is the 6th Amendment, which is the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses. The point of the 6th Amendment Confrontation Clause is to give the defendant more rights at trial. These rights include, the right to confront their accuser and the witness that are against them. The 6th Amendment also establishes the guidelines for out-of-court

    Read More

  • Common Pleas: Court Case Study

    553 Words  | 3 Pages

    MILLERSBURG — Despite a plea for leniency expressed by the victim, a Sugarcreek man was unable to overcome a long history of criminal convictions and a bond violation when a Holmes County judge on Wednesday sentenced him to prison for making unwanted phone calls and threats to several members of a family over a period of months. David Lamar Schrock, 43, of 2578 State Route 39, previously pleaded guilty in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to two counts of telephone harassment and one count of menacing by stalking. In exchange for his guilty plea, the state agreed to dismiss two additional counts of telephone harassment and three counts of menacing by stalking. The charges are made more serious because Schrock was convicted, in January 2016,

    Read More

  • John Wayne Gacy's Contributions To The Justice System

    1030 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Constitution states “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.” ( US Constitution) As you can see, the Bill of Rights 6th Amendment allows the accused to understand the charges against them: the accused is told what he/ she is being accused of, who is accusing them, and is allowed to enter a plea of guilty or not guilty. Moreover, it allows for the movement of rightful convictions.

    Read More

  • Fifth Amendment Rights During Trial

    238 Words  | 1 Pages

    Regardless of what is fair and what is not, the defendant has rights during trial. One of those rights under the 5th Amendment is the right against self incrimination and according to Winegar, the 6th Amendment provides a defendant the ability to testify on one’s behalf (2013). However, lack of testimony from a defendant can cause an interference with the jury or cloud their judgement because they were not previewed to what the defendant has to say. According to Hall, the jury is instructed not to guess or assume guilt because the defendant does not put on a defense.

    Read More

  • America's Jury System

    736 Words  | 3 Pages

    Not knowing whether they are educated can really make or break an argument. Similarly, many people still believe in the sixth amendment: “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district where in the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law.” Is this amendment still valid in today's society? Is a trial by jury still fair and speedy? With the access to technology we have discussing the matters of a case to others not involved is almost impossible.

    Read More

  • Advantages And Disadvantages Of Jury Evidence

    76 Words  | 1 Pages

    e jury receives its direction from the judge. A jury will hear all the evidence during a trial. If the judge is unsure whether certain evidence is proper, the jury may be asked to leave while the judge hears arguments about whether certain evidence can be admitted. At the end of the trial, the judge will instruct the jury on the legal results, which must follow the different possible finding fact. After being given these fin

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: The Verdict In Court Cases

    407 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Verdict “The defendant has been found... ” A verdict that rocked the nation in many trials such as O.J. Simpson, Casey Anthony, Amanda Knox and many others. What do all of these cases have in common? A large amount of controversy and media coverage. With highly publicized cases such as these.

    Read More

  • 6th Amendment Importance

    847 Words  | 4 Pages

    Trials shouldn’t be done in secret way from public eyes because how can you call that fair. Libertyfirstfl.org states that the 6th amendment has multiple clauses within it. Speedy Trial Clause, Public Trial Clause, Right to a Jury Trial Clause, Confrontation Clause, Arraignment Clause, Compulsory Process Clause, and Right to Counsel Clause. Right to jury is crucial to having a fair and just trial. It picks random citizens to sit in a trial, they don’t choose people that might know the defendant.

    Read More

  • Advantages Of The 7th Amendment

    583 Words  | 3 Pages

    If people never had a right to trial by the jury, they could simply find people guilty of any accusation that are falsely claimed. Hence, through instituting the right to trial by the jury, the 7th amendment protects the citizens from this

    Read More

  • Right To Speedy And Expeditious Criminal Trial

    205 Words  | 1 Pages

    RIGHTS TO SPEEDY AND EXPEDITIOUS CRIMINAL TRIAL: The right to speedy and expeditious criminal trial is one of the most valuable and cherished fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution. It is an integral component of right to life and liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of our Constitution. In a case where the proceedings had been lingering on for 10 years and proceedings were to commence de novo of the transfer of the Presiding Officer. On several dates, the witnesses had not appeared and the case did not make any progress.

    Read More

  • Reasonable Doubt In Twelve Angry Men

    1011 Words  | 5 Pages

    This is an important element when deciding who the best and worst jurors were. There were no facts as to who was right or wrong because we didn’t see the crime in question. All

    Read More

  • Trial By Jury Advantages And Disadvantages

    1472 Words  | 6 Pages

    This essay will briefly discuss the role of the jury and how it works, from the principle behind it, to the method with which members are selected, and to the powers available to jurors. Moreover, it will outline advantages and disadvantages of trial by jury, and it will point out a couple of ways which could ameliorate this type of trial. Trial by jury has been a part of the criminal justice system since the 12th century (Davies, 2015), it is considered an ancient right and a symbol of liberty (Hostettler, 2004). It creates no precedent and it can decide challenging cases equitably without making bad law, it also brings members of the public into the administration of justice and into an understanding of legal and human rights (Hostettler,

    Read More

  • Celebrities In The Society

    847 Words  | 4 Pages

    In America, in the June of 1994, football star and actor O.J. Simpson’s wife, Nicole Brown Simpson and a waiter Ronald Goldman were found murdered outside Nicole’s condo in Los Angeles. Evidence collected at the scene of crime led the investigators to believe that O.J. Simpson was the murderer. However, after a trial that lasted eight months, he was acquitted. Glaring instances like these lead us to believe that money talks and witnesses can be swayed in favor of the accused (Boyette,

    Read More

More about Court Systems: The Change In Court System

Open Document