Credibility And Trustworthiness

In the book, The Giver, the main character Jonas, is selected as the next Receiver of Memory because he displayed four traits; Intelligence, Integrity, Courage, and Wisdom. Today, I will show what I have found of Jonas’ integrity throughout the book. Through his words, behavior, and actions, we will see the integrity that gave Jonas his role as Receiver. So let’s get started.

Like you have mentioned they are helping researchers gain valuable evidence and this should be respected.

Specifically, RIA’s search features are extremely straightforward and user friendly. Beyond that, RIA allows for the researcher to search for given material in a variety of ways. This enables the researcher to receive information in a quick and efficient manner, which can be extremely valuable. Therefore, the variety of features available and the convenience of the system may encourage some people who are unsure if they want to invest in a membership with RIA checkpoint, to ultimately make the

A common understanding is reached: FPTP has both pros and cons. It can prove to be a successful system if it's reviewed and apprehended properly. Both sides have presented valid and logical pints during the discussion. But the agreeing side could have elaborated the details more precisely, such as describing how gerrymandering plays a vital role in FPTP, or what are the potential substitutions for FPTP. Most of the other points are significant and relevant.

Nosek stated that the IAT “displayed satisfactory internal consistency” because of its ability to get the same result repeatedly which directed to Nosek and Hanse to get “reliably”, (Rezaei, 2011) outcome. The consistency is portrayed within the prediction of social behaviours. Its stated that the “implicit measures of attitudes are especially predictive”, (Dovidio, 1997) revealing the idea of the IAT having a good re-test reliability as each result is consistent. Steffens and Buchner also state the consistency is “very high” which further supports the IAT’s reliability. Overall, IAT’s reliability has made the test become a “widely used instrument” (McConnell and Leibold, 2001) to measure implicit bias which makes the test a finer of measuring bias.

Validation of accuracy is very important to a study suchas this, so more studies should be performed and reviewed in the same way this articlewas done. The findings of the team seem to make sense in how a higher number oflicensed staff would result in a higher quality of care, so it should be an easy topic tofollow up on using national databases and informational documents. I like the

Study Strengths I was able to see that there were many strengths throughout this case study. The researchers ability to take a syndrome that often goes unnoticed and provide some understanding. The information presented and the breakdown of the findings and how they were able to make these conclusions were the strongest part of the case study. I feel that the researchers having a solid plan and able to discuss the purpose and process strengthens the credibility of the findings because the researchers seem to know what they are talking

However, though visualize differently, reliability and validity are quite important in qualitative research. They helped the readers to understand how much confidence can be placed in the result. Lindlof (2002) says” Basically, we want to inspire confidence in readers (and ourselves) that we have achieved right interpretations.” So now, the question to be answer is “How to ensure the reliability and validity of qualitative method?” Patton (2001) advocates the use of triangulation by stating “triangulation strengthens a study by combining methods.

Validity and Reliability The validity of a research examination is the characteristic that makes it credible and attests to the rigour that was performed. The validity of the study involves about their purposes and logical consistency between its constituents. Validity and reliability are fundamentally two main components in a research which plays a perilous role. When dependability and impartiality is coordinated to a high level then at that point the reliability and validity of the qualitative study are better enhanced and assumed (Saunders, Lewis, & Thornhill, Research Methods for Business Students, 2009).

What I found appealing about coherence theory is the fact that it explains how scientists can make claims about the very large and small objects using a system of claims already accepted to be true. With this, scientists could save a lot and even move to perfection with necessary going through much protocol. What I found discouraging is the fact that this accept proposition as true simply because it agree with other true propositions. I think digging more to better understand the facts before agreeing will helps in strengthening the