Crime victim compensation is a government program that reimburses victims of violent crimes. Victims can get compensated for assault, rape, and homicide and their families can be reimbursed for many of their out of pocket expenses (Karmen, 2016). Every state has a crime victim compensation program that allocates funds to survivors of violent crimes that is funded by fees collected from criminal offenders and a federal grant through the Victims of Crime Act, administered by the U.S. Department of Justice. In order to be eligible for compensation the victim must report the offense within a certain amount of time, cooperate in the investigation and prosecution, and file an application within a set time. The expenses covered by compensation vary
Crime victims like Lucia and Rosalvas play an important role in the criminal court system. “Beyond the need for victim cooperation to successfully prosecute many crimes, the courts and the people that work in them have a moral obligation to treat victims with respect and dignity. (Craig Hemmens, 2017)” Lucia Garcia in my opinion did not help the case, because she kept stating that the incident that took place was an accident and that it was her own fault. Although Rosalvas Sandoval stated that her was in fear of her own life when Mr. Garcia attempted to carjack her brothers truck when she was sitting on the passenger side. One victim in my opinion helped the case against Alfred Garcia, when one victim stood beside the defendant during the length of the
In the article “2 Men Awarded $750,000 for Wrongful Convictions in 1983 Murder” was about two half brothers who were wrongly convicted for a crime they didn’t commit. The men have been awarded with $50,000 a year, up to $750,000 for each of the men. Even though it may seem like a lot at first after attorney’s fees, the cost of living, and family members it’s not a lot. After 31 years in prison, their compensation would be more than double that amount, if they had not been in prison. The men had been convicted for the rape and murder of an 11 year old in 1983, even though there was physical evidence that either of them had been involved.
Second, the post crisis victim needs must be met. This includes the first responders’ needs at the time of the incident and their mental health needs afterwards. Third, victims’ rights and services must be provided during the criminal justice process. This is taking into the consideration of the victims and their rights to see the judicial proceedings carried out.
Canadian Laws and Processes for Sexual Assault Committing rape, sexual attack, and child sexual abuse are indicted illegally. This is according to Canadian laws. Victims may be oblivious that they also can file a case against assaulters and their bosses civilly to claim reimbursement for their damages. The request for payment does not always have to go to court. Most of the time, these lawsuits are determined outside of the courtroom.
The victim might not have all the evidence of what happened to them but they know that it really happened or maybe there isn’t any witnesses but the victim. For example, in Los Angeles on January 18, 1991 a man named Donald Sarpy who was putting his
Straight financial restitution: This type of restitution requires the juvenile offender to pay money to the victim or a fund established for that purpose. The amount of restitution is typically based on the actual damages suffered by the victim, such as the cost of repairing property damage or the value of stolen items. Financial restitution can be an effective way to compensate victims for their losses, and it can also serve as a deterrent to future criminal behavior. However, it may not be a viable option for all juvenile offenders, especially those who come from low-income families. 2.
The criminal equity framework in the United States has endured a stupendous advancement. There are more than a huge number of African American men in jail that are imprisoned and a large portion of them may never get out. It is conceivable that more African American guys will go to jail in their life expectancy than some other race. This have made dark groups and the up and coming eras dependably turn into the objective. The greater part of these families as of now experience serious difficulties for their family because of single child rearing, the unemployment rate for dark male go up, they can 't vote while being imprisoned, and more individuals feel like jail is another home outside of their home.
Restorative Justice past practices and activities that are popular within the Restorative justice movement are Prisoner rights and alternatives to prisons, which is a program to change prison condition and minimize incarceration sentencing, Conflict Resolution is a program that creates neighborhood justice centers available to the community. The Victim offender Reconciliation program (VORPs) is a meeting between the victim and the community, Victim-Offender Mediation (VOMS) is mediation between the victim and the offender, Victim Advocacy is the victim rights group which focused on the efforts for restitution for the crime. The family group conferences (FGCs) allow the victim and family and the offenders to meet. The Sentencing Circle includes
First, reparations are not going to the ones directly injured. Reparations are not being paid by the ones who did the injury. Reparations are being paid by those who are not guilty of the harm. And reparations are being paid to those who were not directly injured and are generations removed from the crime.
Within the judicial and criminal justice systems, restorative justice is seen as a forward moving process in regards to the way in which the sentencing of offenders is handled (Britto & Reimund, 2013). Restorative justice works to focus on the needs of both the victim and the offender but incorporates the community as well as those who support both the victim and offender (Britto & Reimund, 2013). The approach of restorative justice in not simply a means by which society responds to and reduces crime but instead, provides an equivalently valuable social response to crime (Dancig-Rosenberg and Galt, 2013). Furthermore, the restorative approach places emphasis on the personal and relational harms which were caused by the crime while creating space for dialogue concerning the actual damage, whether directly or
Traditionally, crime has been viewed as a violation against the state. Still too little attention is given to the fact that criminal acts are also violations of the victims and the communities. Punishing and correcting offenders’ criminal behaviors should not only be conducted using the concepts of retribution, incapacitation, and deterrence, it should also be designed to repair the damages done to the victims and the communities. Many benefits are associated with shifting to the restorative justice model, for the victim, the offender, and the community. Restorative justice benefits the victims by giving them a voice regarding the accountability of the offender.
Restorative justice is a response to crime in which it allows the victim and the offender to meet face to face and to settle their problems. It allows both parties to unite and to work out their differences and to make the offender responsible for his own actions (Correctional Services Canada, 2015). Offenders have to make amends with the victim or victims because for the crimes and damage they caused to the victim emotionally and physically (Antonacci, 2013).The boys have to be welcomed back into society by doing some good too help the community out and to be seen as changed members of the community. If this option was taken than the boys would have just done some community service such as helping out the hot dog vendor and cleaning up the
4 Criticism and Challenges The first point of criticism against victim participation in restorative justice processes arises from scepticism about an apology to the victim as a way of dealing with criminal matters. The perception sometimes exists as to it simply being a way to get away with the crime.106 Members of the public should thus be educated to understand that restorative justice is more than a mere saying sorry, but in the context of victim offender mediation or family group conferences it rather affords the victim the opportunity to confront the child offender with the real and human cost of his or her criminal actions. Another concern deals with the possible secondary victimisation of the victim in the case where the offender pretends
Victim witness programs are used by the government in order to provide support and assistance to those who fall victim to a crime. According to Victim Witness Program, the primary goals of such programs, include but are not limited to, encouraging victims to participate in any parole and supervised release processes of their offender, notify and facilitate victims in participation of any hearing or release dates in regards to their offender, provide options for supportive services, and advocate for crime victims (2015, para.1). The organization under which the victim-witness program is located is under a system, which has many internal constituencies, thus creating competing and conflicting purposes. The goals of the victim-witness program are quite simple and seek out to give the victim the right to be represented during the processing of the offender, however, given the multiple roles the court, for example, must serve, the goals of the victim-witness program can be both complex and conflicting.
Key words victims, victimology, criminal justice system, victim compensation, supreme court on