Criminal Capacity Case Study
1 Introduction
In respect of criminal capacity there is an ongoing dispute about the defence of criminal incapacity due to provocation or emotional stress. This debate revolves around the application of logic and legal principles versus that of policy considerations.
2 Criminal capacity
This element of the crime is a purely subjective inquiry into the state of mind of the accused at the time of the commission of the crime and is based on the principle of individual autonomy. The state bears the onus of proving criminal capacity beyond reasonable doubt.
It consists of two legs, namely the conative capacity and the cognitive capacity. The cognitive capacity is the capacity for insight and has to do with an understanding and an ability
…show more content…
The accused had bludgeoned the deceased to death after an event of severe provocation. The accused had been driving home and had been intoxicated. The deceased provoked the accused by driving closely behind him with his headlights on bright, overtaking him and then slowing down. The deceased had also been intoxicated. At a stop light the accused jumped out of his car and in a fit of rage assaulted the deceased to death. The accused raised a defence of temporary non-pathological criminal incapacity due to severe provocation or emotional stress. He claimed that he had known the wrongfulness of his conduct but that he did not possess the required self-control to refrain from beating the victim. Thus according to the defendant he had the cognitive capacity but lacked conative capacity. The trial court rejected this defence and convicted him of …show more content…
The law clearly states that the test for capacity is purely subjective. The learned judge in Eadie states that “hundreds and thousands of people daily find themselves in similar or worse situations, yet they do not go out clubbing fellow motorists to death when their anger may be provoked”. This objective test complies with policy considerations. It would be unacceptable for a person to kill another and simply raise the defence that they had lost self-control. The problem here is that the defence of provocation easily affords an acquittal which is contrary to the common sense feeling of injustice. The court also emphasises that there is a difference between losing self-control and losing one’s
Reaction Paper About Tavares
796 Words | 4 PagesPure Comparative Negligence Rule Most times in self-defense, the accused puts across a countercharge against the accuser on one or more grounds. In such exceptional cases, the ‘pure comparative negligence rule’ is applied. Under this rule, the fault(s) of both the accuser are also taken into account in detail. A comparative analysis is conducted, wherein the fault(s) of both parties are compared along with submitted proof(s) to reach a conclusion.
Memorandum: Aggravated Mayhem Charge Against Harvey Brewer
692 Words | 3 PagesId. at 832. The court described the attack as cold, calm, and deliberate and held that the evidence was sufficient for the jury to reasonably infer the specific intent for aggravated mayhem. Id. at
Comparing 'To Kill A Mockingbird And Twelve Angry Men'
883 Words | 4 PagesHe also claims a knife fell out of his pocket and later, that same knife was used to kill his father. And he had a good motivation too; getting beaten with fists. Although I think in both trials the outcome would be the same; a reasonable doubt of
Summary Of Morgan V Sate
782 Words | 4 PagesCitation: Morgan v Sate, 537 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 1989) Facts: James A. Morgan, the appellant, who at sixteen was diagnosed as organically brain-damaged and brain-impaired, murdered the elderly woman with whom he was employed to perform manual labor. Morgan is described as a teenage alcoholic, who since the age of four sniffed gasoline on a regular basis.
Wilkins Vs Gaddy Case Study
458 Words | 2 PagesIn reversing the decision of the district court, the Court held the “core judicial injury” was “whether force was applied in a good-faith effort to maintain or restore discipline, or maliciously and sadistically to cause harm.” The extent of injury Wilkin’s suffered may have been relevant in determining the level of force that was applied but just because the prisoner may have escaped serious injury does not prohibit the individual from pursuing a
People V Fuller Case Brief
493 Words | 2 PagesHowever, the judge was reluctant to apply it during trial because it equates an accidental killing from a petty theft to that of premeditated murder. 3. In People v. Fuller, 86 Cal. App. 3d. 618 (1978),
Ronald Rompilla Vs Jeffrey A Beard Summary
890 Words | 4 PagesThe prosecution sought to prove three aggravating factors to support the death sentence: that the murder was committed in the course of another felony; that the murder was committed by acts of torture, and that Rompilla has a significant history
Arizona Revised Statutes And The Texas Penal Code
1022 Words | 5 PagesThe mens rea for this offense under subsection A.2 is that the defendant recklessly or negligently took the life of another. The causation for the crime is that the defendant acted because of a “sudden quarrel or heat of passion resulting from adequate provocation of the victim”. (ARS). These elements would allow the State to meet its burden of proof to convict a defendant of voluntary
The Case Of Esther Summerson And The Criminal Code Of Canada
984 Words | 4 PagesWhen Esther Summerson ran over her husband Creakle, the accident occurred while driving. Accordingly, the issue at hand is whether her manner of driving was irresponsible making her culpable in the death of her husband. Therefore, a lack of mens rea if proven is the only defense that can show a lack of criminal culpability for Esther in the death of Creakle. Esther can be charged under S.249(4) “Dangerous operation causing death” of the Criminal Code of Canada (hereafter, the Criminal Code) if her manner of driving is considered dangerous to the public (Criminal Code, 1985).
Roper V. Simmons Essay
872 Words | 4 PagesIn Roper v. Simmons there are two issues that must be addressed, the first being the issue of moral maturity and culpability. The defense in the trial phase of this case argued that Mr. Simmons was an at an age where he was not responsible enough to fully understand the effects and consequences of his actions. The majority draws on Atkins v. Virginia to argue that this specific precedent supports their case that the death penalty should not be imposed on the mentally immature or impaired. However, an important point to be made is that the Atkins v. Virginia decision is geared towards the clinical definition of mental retardation: significant limitations that limit adaptive skills. Also, another important question to consider is the competency and premeditation of Mr. Simmons’ crime in this case.
R V. Francis: The Attempted Murder Of Timothy Udris
1586 Words | 7 PagesIntroduction In the matter of R v Francis , the defendant (Glen Reginald Francis) was being tried for the attempted murder of Timothy Udris. On 8th June 2014, Glenn Francis (‘Francis’) attacked Timothy Udris (‘Udris’), who was hit at least two times with a claw hammer to the skull. The Crown submitted that Francis had attempted to murder Udris, under s306 Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld).
How Does Daubert Impact On Forensic Science
584 Words | 3 PagesThe first and foremost thing which judges must determine is whether a guilty person is enough to qualify by knowledge, experience, training or education to give expert testimony. It implies that a
12 Angry Men Murder Scene Analysis
851 Words | 4 PagesThe judge declares the “Murder in the first degree—premeditated homicide—is the most serious charge tried in our criminal courts. One man is dead. The life of another is at stake. If there is a reasonable doubt in your minds as to the guilt of the accused … then you must declare him not guilty. If, however, there is no reasonable doubt, then he must be found guilty.
Essay On The Age Of Criminal Responsibility
1342 Words | 6 PagesCriminal responsibility is referred to a person’s capability to understand his or her behavior at the time a crime is committed. In other words it is what a person was thinking when he or she commits a crime, or what result he or she was expecting when they commits a crime (Study.com). MACR is the age that a child has attained the emotional, mental and intellectual maturity to be held responsible for their actions. A child under the age of criminal responsibility does not have the ability to be guilty of committing a crime. Therefore, any child under the age of criminal responsibility cannot be prosecuted or punished.
Difference Between Self Defence And Common Law
772 Words | 4 PagesIn some situations there can be an overlap, where the claimant cannot rely solely on statutory defence. In the situation of a person not being capable of committing a crime – for example underage, or insane then they would have to rely upon the Common Law. The amount of force used in both must be reasonable. In the case of R v Cousins (1982) it was held that both defences are available to an
More about Criminal Capacity Case Study
Reaction Paper About Tavares
796 Words | 4 PagesMemorandum: Aggravated Mayhem Charge Against Harvey Brewer
692 Words | 3 PagesComparing 'To Kill A Mockingbird And Twelve Angry Men'
883 Words | 4 PagesSummary Of Morgan V Sate
782 Words | 4 PagesWilkins Vs Gaddy Case Study
458 Words | 2 PagesPeople V Fuller Case Brief
493 Words | 2 PagesRonald Rompilla Vs Jeffrey A Beard Summary
890 Words | 4 PagesArizona Revised Statutes And The Texas Penal Code
1022 Words | 5 PagesThe Case Of Esther Summerson And The Criminal Code Of Canada
984 Words | 4 PagesRoper V. Simmons Essay
872 Words | 4 PagesR V. Francis: The Attempted Murder Of Timothy Udris
1586 Words | 7 PagesHow Does Daubert Impact On Forensic Science
584 Words | 3 Pages12 Angry Men Murder Scene Analysis
851 Words | 4 PagesEssay On The Age Of Criminal Responsibility
1342 Words | 6 PagesDifference Between Self Defence And Common Law
772 Words | 4 Pages